Cargando…
Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling
An extensive research field in regenerative medicine is electrical stimulation (ES) and its impact on tissue and cells. The mechanism of action of ES, particularly the role of electrical parameters like intensity, frequency, and duration of the electric field, is not yet fully understood. Human MG-6...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11172650 |
_version_ | 1784785446959579136 |
---|---|
author | Staehlke, Susanne Bielfeldt, Meike Zimmermann, Julius Gruening, Martina Barke, Ingo Freitag, Thomas Speller, Sylvia Van Rienen, Ursula Nebe, Barbara |
author_facet | Staehlke, Susanne Bielfeldt, Meike Zimmermann, Julius Gruening, Martina Barke, Ingo Freitag, Thomas Speller, Sylvia Van Rienen, Ursula Nebe, Barbara |
author_sort | Staehlke, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | An extensive research field in regenerative medicine is electrical stimulation (ES) and its impact on tissue and cells. The mechanism of action of ES, particularly the role of electrical parameters like intensity, frequency, and duration of the electric field, is not yet fully understood. Human MG-63 osteoblasts were electrically stimulated for 10 min with a commercially available multi-channel system (IonOptix). We generated alternating current (AC) electrical fields with a voltage of 1 or 5 V and frequencies of 7.9 or 20 Hz, respectively. To exclude liquid-mediated effects, we characterized the AC-stimulated culture medium. AC stimulation did not change the medium’s pH, temperature, and oxygen content. The H(2)O(2) level was comparable with the unstimulated samples except at 5 V_7.9 Hz, where a significant increase in H(2)O(2) was found within the first 30 min. Pulsed electrical stimulation was beneficial for the process of attachment and initial adhesion of suspended osteoblasts. At the same time, the intracellular Ca(2+) level was enhanced and highest for 20 Hz stimulated cells with 1 and 5 V, respectively. In addition, increased Ca(2+) mobilization after an additional trigger (ATP) was detected at these parameters. New knowledge was provided on why electrical stimulation contributes to cell activation in bone tissue regeneration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9454840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94548402022-09-09 Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling Staehlke, Susanne Bielfeldt, Meike Zimmermann, Julius Gruening, Martina Barke, Ingo Freitag, Thomas Speller, Sylvia Van Rienen, Ursula Nebe, Barbara Cells Article An extensive research field in regenerative medicine is electrical stimulation (ES) and its impact on tissue and cells. The mechanism of action of ES, particularly the role of electrical parameters like intensity, frequency, and duration of the electric field, is not yet fully understood. Human MG-63 osteoblasts were electrically stimulated for 10 min with a commercially available multi-channel system (IonOptix). We generated alternating current (AC) electrical fields with a voltage of 1 or 5 V and frequencies of 7.9 or 20 Hz, respectively. To exclude liquid-mediated effects, we characterized the AC-stimulated culture medium. AC stimulation did not change the medium’s pH, temperature, and oxygen content. The H(2)O(2) level was comparable with the unstimulated samples except at 5 V_7.9 Hz, where a significant increase in H(2)O(2) was found within the first 30 min. Pulsed electrical stimulation was beneficial for the process of attachment and initial adhesion of suspended osteoblasts. At the same time, the intracellular Ca(2+) level was enhanced and highest for 20 Hz stimulated cells with 1 and 5 V, respectively. In addition, increased Ca(2+) mobilization after an additional trigger (ATP) was detected at these parameters. New knowledge was provided on why electrical stimulation contributes to cell activation in bone tissue regeneration. MDPI 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9454840/ /pubmed/36078058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11172650 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Staehlke, Susanne Bielfeldt, Meike Zimmermann, Julius Gruening, Martina Barke, Ingo Freitag, Thomas Speller, Sylvia Van Rienen, Ursula Nebe, Barbara Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling |
title | Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling |
title_full | Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling |
title_fullStr | Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling |
title_full_unstemmed | Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling |
title_short | Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling |
title_sort | pulsed electrical stimulation affects osteoblast adhesion and calcium ion signaling |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11172650 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT staehlkesusanne pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling AT bielfeldtmeike pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling AT zimmermannjulius pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling AT grueningmartina pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling AT barkeingo pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling AT freitagthomas pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling AT spellersylvia pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling AT vanrienenursula pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling AT nebebarbara pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling |