Cargando…

Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling

An extensive research field in regenerative medicine is electrical stimulation (ES) and its impact on tissue and cells. The mechanism of action of ES, particularly the role of electrical parameters like intensity, frequency, and duration of the electric field, is not yet fully understood. Human MG-6...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staehlke, Susanne, Bielfeldt, Meike, Zimmermann, Julius, Gruening, Martina, Barke, Ingo, Freitag, Thomas, Speller, Sylvia, Van Rienen, Ursula, Nebe, Barbara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11172650
_version_ 1784785446959579136
author Staehlke, Susanne
Bielfeldt, Meike
Zimmermann, Julius
Gruening, Martina
Barke, Ingo
Freitag, Thomas
Speller, Sylvia
Van Rienen, Ursula
Nebe, Barbara
author_facet Staehlke, Susanne
Bielfeldt, Meike
Zimmermann, Julius
Gruening, Martina
Barke, Ingo
Freitag, Thomas
Speller, Sylvia
Van Rienen, Ursula
Nebe, Barbara
author_sort Staehlke, Susanne
collection PubMed
description An extensive research field in regenerative medicine is electrical stimulation (ES) and its impact on tissue and cells. The mechanism of action of ES, particularly the role of electrical parameters like intensity, frequency, and duration of the electric field, is not yet fully understood. Human MG-63 osteoblasts were electrically stimulated for 10 min with a commercially available multi-channel system (IonOptix). We generated alternating current (AC) electrical fields with a voltage of 1 or 5 V and frequencies of 7.9 or 20 Hz, respectively. To exclude liquid-mediated effects, we characterized the AC-stimulated culture medium. AC stimulation did not change the medium’s pH, temperature, and oxygen content. The H(2)O(2) level was comparable with the unstimulated samples except at 5 V_7.9 Hz, where a significant increase in H(2)O(2) was found within the first 30 min. Pulsed electrical stimulation was beneficial for the process of attachment and initial adhesion of suspended osteoblasts. At the same time, the intracellular Ca(2+) level was enhanced and highest for 20 Hz stimulated cells with 1 and 5 V, respectively. In addition, increased Ca(2+) mobilization after an additional trigger (ATP) was detected at these parameters. New knowledge was provided on why electrical stimulation contributes to cell activation in bone tissue regeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9454840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94548402022-09-09 Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling Staehlke, Susanne Bielfeldt, Meike Zimmermann, Julius Gruening, Martina Barke, Ingo Freitag, Thomas Speller, Sylvia Van Rienen, Ursula Nebe, Barbara Cells Article An extensive research field in regenerative medicine is electrical stimulation (ES) and its impact on tissue and cells. The mechanism of action of ES, particularly the role of electrical parameters like intensity, frequency, and duration of the electric field, is not yet fully understood. Human MG-63 osteoblasts were electrically stimulated for 10 min with a commercially available multi-channel system (IonOptix). We generated alternating current (AC) electrical fields with a voltage of 1 or 5 V and frequencies of 7.9 or 20 Hz, respectively. To exclude liquid-mediated effects, we characterized the AC-stimulated culture medium. AC stimulation did not change the medium’s pH, temperature, and oxygen content. The H(2)O(2) level was comparable with the unstimulated samples except at 5 V_7.9 Hz, where a significant increase in H(2)O(2) was found within the first 30 min. Pulsed electrical stimulation was beneficial for the process of attachment and initial adhesion of suspended osteoblasts. At the same time, the intracellular Ca(2+) level was enhanced and highest for 20 Hz stimulated cells with 1 and 5 V, respectively. In addition, increased Ca(2+) mobilization after an additional trigger (ATP) was detected at these parameters. New knowledge was provided on why electrical stimulation contributes to cell activation in bone tissue regeneration. MDPI 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9454840/ /pubmed/36078058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11172650 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Staehlke, Susanne
Bielfeldt, Meike
Zimmermann, Julius
Gruening, Martina
Barke, Ingo
Freitag, Thomas
Speller, Sylvia
Van Rienen, Ursula
Nebe, Barbara
Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling
title Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling
title_full Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling
title_fullStr Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling
title_short Pulsed Electrical Stimulation Affects Osteoblast Adhesion and Calcium Ion Signaling
title_sort pulsed electrical stimulation affects osteoblast adhesion and calcium ion signaling
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cells11172650
work_keys_str_mv AT staehlkesusanne pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling
AT bielfeldtmeike pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling
AT zimmermannjulius pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling
AT grueningmartina pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling
AT barkeingo pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling
AT freitagthomas pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling
AT spellersylvia pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling
AT vanrienenursula pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling
AT nebebarbara pulsedelectricalstimulationaffectsosteoblastadhesionandcalciumionsignaling