Cargando…

Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND: Nociception monitors are being increasingly used during surgery, but their effectiveness in guiding intraoperative opioid administration is still uncertain. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the effectiveness of nociception monitors vs. standard p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Dandan, Ma, Jiahui, Chen, Huayong, Mu, Dongliang, Kong, Hao, Yu, Lingzhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.963185
_version_ 1784785474778300416
author Ma, Dandan
Ma, Jiahui
Chen, Huayong
Mu, Dongliang
Kong, Hao
Yu, Lingzhi
author_facet Ma, Dandan
Ma, Jiahui
Chen, Huayong
Mu, Dongliang
Kong, Hao
Yu, Lingzhi
author_sort Ma, Dandan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Nociception monitors are being increasingly used during surgery, but their effectiveness in guiding intraoperative opioid administration is still uncertain. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the effectiveness of nociception monitors vs. standard practice for opioid administration titration during general anesthesia. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trial, and Web of Science from inception up to August 1, 2021, to identify relevant articles, and extracted the relevant data. Intraoperative opioid administration, extubation time, postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were compared between patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance and patients receiving standard management. The standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence interval (CI), was used to assess the significance of differences. The risk ratio (RR), with 95% CI, was used to assess the difference in incidence of PONV. Heterogeneity among the included trials was evaluated by the I(2) test. RevMan 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 21 RCTs (with 1957 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Intraoperative opioid administration was significantly lower in patients receiving nociception monitor-guided analgesia than in patients receiving standard management (SMD, −0.71; 95% CI, −1.07 to −0.36; P < 0.001). However, pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption were not significantly higher in the former group. Considerable heterogeneity was found among the studies (92%). Extubation time was significantly shorter (SMD, −0.22; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.03; P = 0.02) and the incidence of PONV significantly lower (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.00; P = 0.05) in patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative nociception monitoring guidance may reduce intraoperative opioid administration and appears to be a viable strategy for intraoperative titration of opioids. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=273619, identifier: CRD42019129776.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9454957
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94549572022-09-09 Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Ma, Dandan Ma, Jiahui Chen, Huayong Mu, Dongliang Kong, Hao Yu, Lingzhi Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Nociception monitors are being increasingly used during surgery, but their effectiveness in guiding intraoperative opioid administration is still uncertain. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the effectiveness of nociception monitors vs. standard practice for opioid administration titration during general anesthesia. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trial, and Web of Science from inception up to August 1, 2021, to identify relevant articles, and extracted the relevant data. Intraoperative opioid administration, extubation time, postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were compared between patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance and patients receiving standard management. The standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence interval (CI), was used to assess the significance of differences. The risk ratio (RR), with 95% CI, was used to assess the difference in incidence of PONV. Heterogeneity among the included trials was evaluated by the I(2) test. RevMan 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 21 RCTs (with 1957 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Intraoperative opioid administration was significantly lower in patients receiving nociception monitor-guided analgesia than in patients receiving standard management (SMD, −0.71; 95% CI, −1.07 to −0.36; P < 0.001). However, pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption were not significantly higher in the former group. Considerable heterogeneity was found among the studies (92%). Extubation time was significantly shorter (SMD, −0.22; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.03; P = 0.02) and the incidence of PONV significantly lower (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.00; P = 0.05) in patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative nociception monitoring guidance may reduce intraoperative opioid administration and appears to be a viable strategy for intraoperative titration of opioids. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=273619, identifier: CRD42019129776. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9454957/ /pubmed/36091708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.963185 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ma, Ma, Chen, Mu, Kong and Yu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Ma, Dandan
Ma, Jiahui
Chen, Huayong
Mu, Dongliang
Kong, Hao
Yu, Lingzhi
Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454957/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091708
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.963185
work_keys_str_mv AT madandan nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT majiahui nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT chenhuayong nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mudongliang nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT konghao nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT yulingzhi nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials