Cargando…
Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BACKGROUND: Nociception monitors are being increasingly used during surgery, but their effectiveness in guiding intraoperative opioid administration is still uncertain. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the effectiveness of nociception monitors vs. standard p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.963185 |
_version_ | 1784785474778300416 |
---|---|
author | Ma, Dandan Ma, Jiahui Chen, Huayong Mu, Dongliang Kong, Hao Yu, Lingzhi |
author_facet | Ma, Dandan Ma, Jiahui Chen, Huayong Mu, Dongliang Kong, Hao Yu, Lingzhi |
author_sort | Ma, Dandan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Nociception monitors are being increasingly used during surgery, but their effectiveness in guiding intraoperative opioid administration is still uncertain. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the effectiveness of nociception monitors vs. standard practice for opioid administration titration during general anesthesia. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trial, and Web of Science from inception up to August 1, 2021, to identify relevant articles, and extracted the relevant data. Intraoperative opioid administration, extubation time, postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were compared between patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance and patients receiving standard management. The standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence interval (CI), was used to assess the significance of differences. The risk ratio (RR), with 95% CI, was used to assess the difference in incidence of PONV. Heterogeneity among the included trials was evaluated by the I(2) test. RevMan 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 21 RCTs (with 1957 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Intraoperative opioid administration was significantly lower in patients receiving nociception monitor-guided analgesia than in patients receiving standard management (SMD, −0.71; 95% CI, −1.07 to −0.36; P < 0.001). However, pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption were not significantly higher in the former group. Considerable heterogeneity was found among the studies (92%). Extubation time was significantly shorter (SMD, −0.22; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.03; P = 0.02) and the incidence of PONV significantly lower (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.00; P = 0.05) in patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative nociception monitoring guidance may reduce intraoperative opioid administration and appears to be a viable strategy for intraoperative titration of opioids. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=273619, identifier: CRD42019129776. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9454957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94549572022-09-09 Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Ma, Dandan Ma, Jiahui Chen, Huayong Mu, Dongliang Kong, Hao Yu, Lingzhi Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Nociception monitors are being increasingly used during surgery, but their effectiveness in guiding intraoperative opioid administration is still uncertain. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the effectiveness of nociception monitors vs. standard practice for opioid administration titration during general anesthesia. METHODS: We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Clinical Trial, and Web of Science from inception up to August 1, 2021, to identify relevant articles, and extracted the relevant data. Intraoperative opioid administration, extubation time, postoperative pain score, postoperative opioid consumption and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were compared between patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance and patients receiving standard management. The standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence interval (CI), was used to assess the significance of differences. The risk ratio (RR), with 95% CI, was used to assess the difference in incidence of PONV. Heterogeneity among the included trials was evaluated by the I(2) test. RevMan 5.3 software was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 21 RCTs (with 1957 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. Intraoperative opioid administration was significantly lower in patients receiving nociception monitor-guided analgesia than in patients receiving standard management (SMD, −0.71; 95% CI, −1.07 to −0.36; P < 0.001). However, pain scores and postoperative opioid consumption were not significantly higher in the former group. Considerable heterogeneity was found among the studies (92%). Extubation time was significantly shorter (SMD, −0.22; 95% CI, −0.41 to −0.03; P = 0.02) and the incidence of PONV significantly lower (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.00; P = 0.05) in patients receiving nociception monitoring guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative nociception monitoring guidance may reduce intraoperative opioid administration and appears to be a viable strategy for intraoperative titration of opioids. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=273619, identifier: CRD42019129776. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9454957/ /pubmed/36091708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.963185 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ma, Ma, Chen, Mu, Kong and Yu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Ma, Dandan Ma, Jiahui Chen, Huayong Mu, Dongliang Kong, Hao Yu, Lingzhi Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title | Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | nociception monitors vs. standard practice for titration of opioid administration in general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9454957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091708 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.963185 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT madandan nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT majiahui nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT chenhuayong nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT mudongliang nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT konghao nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT yulingzhi nociceptionmonitorsvsstandardpracticefortitrationofopioidadministrationingeneralanesthesiaametaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |