Cargando…
Benefits and Conflicts: A Systematic Review of Dog Park Design and Management Strategies
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Dog parks contribute physical and social benefits for both canines and their owners, especially during and since the COVID-19 pandemic. However, dogs in public places can create various conflicts. Growing numbers of scholars have explored strategies for effective park design and mana...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9455081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077971 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12172251 |
_version_ | 1784785505094729728 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Shuolei Wu, Zhuoran Sleipness, Ole Russell Wang, Hao |
author_facet | Chen, Shuolei Wu, Zhuoran Sleipness, Ole Russell Wang, Hao |
author_sort | Chen, Shuolei |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Dog parks contribute physical and social benefits for both canines and their owners, especially during and since the COVID-19 pandemic. However, dogs in public places can create various conflicts. Growing numbers of scholars have explored strategies for effective park design and management. This systematic study synthesizes and analyze the benefits, conflicts, and strategies for the design and management of dog parks according to the PRISMA guidelines. Based on the summary of conflicts between canines, humans, and their environment, we present design and management guidance for dog parks to effectively mitigate these conflicts while enhancing the benefits of off-leash areas. While this study promotes a sustainable and healthy coexistence of canines and residents of built environments through appropriate design and management strategies, several research and practice gaps have been identified from the results, such as the dearth of experimental evidence and limitations of the physical benefits of dog parks. These research gaps provide opportunities for experts to address in future. ABSTRACT: Dog ownership and dog walking brings various health benefits for urban dwellers, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, but trigger a number of controversies. Dog parks have become increasingly significant public resources in the pandemic to support these benefits while facing intense conflicts. To develop effective dog parks in urban settings, growing numbers of scholars have provided insights into the design and management strategies for addressing the benefits and conflicts. The objective of this study is to synthesize and analyze various aspects of dog park design and management and to assess identified strategies for enhancing their benefits while mitigating their drawbacks. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic study was conducted to synthesize the benefits, conflicts, and management strategies of dog parks, supported by Citespace. Benefits and conflicts in dog park design and management have been synthesized and organized according to their frequency of presence and the statistical results. We analyzed and assessed existing design and management strategies. Through this systematic study, we discovered the need obtain o po experimental evidence on effective dog park design and management to enhance their benefits while mitigating their sources of conflict and limitations in the intensity of park visitors’ physical activity in off-leash areas. Guidelines for the design and management strategies for effective dog parks were made to enhance their benefits while alleviating conflicts in the future development of sustainable dog parks that promote healthy relationships between canines and residents in urban built environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9455081 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94550812022-09-09 Benefits and Conflicts: A Systematic Review of Dog Park Design and Management Strategies Chen, Shuolei Wu, Zhuoran Sleipness, Ole Russell Wang, Hao Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Dog parks contribute physical and social benefits for both canines and their owners, especially during and since the COVID-19 pandemic. However, dogs in public places can create various conflicts. Growing numbers of scholars have explored strategies for effective park design and management. This systematic study synthesizes and analyze the benefits, conflicts, and strategies for the design and management of dog parks according to the PRISMA guidelines. Based on the summary of conflicts between canines, humans, and their environment, we present design and management guidance for dog parks to effectively mitigate these conflicts while enhancing the benefits of off-leash areas. While this study promotes a sustainable and healthy coexistence of canines and residents of built environments through appropriate design and management strategies, several research and practice gaps have been identified from the results, such as the dearth of experimental evidence and limitations of the physical benefits of dog parks. These research gaps provide opportunities for experts to address in future. ABSTRACT: Dog ownership and dog walking brings various health benefits for urban dwellers, especially since the COVID-19 pandemic, but trigger a number of controversies. Dog parks have become increasingly significant public resources in the pandemic to support these benefits while facing intense conflicts. To develop effective dog parks in urban settings, growing numbers of scholars have provided insights into the design and management strategies for addressing the benefits and conflicts. The objective of this study is to synthesize and analyze various aspects of dog park design and management and to assess identified strategies for enhancing their benefits while mitigating their drawbacks. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic study was conducted to synthesize the benefits, conflicts, and management strategies of dog parks, supported by Citespace. Benefits and conflicts in dog park design and management have been synthesized and organized according to their frequency of presence and the statistical results. We analyzed and assessed existing design and management strategies. Through this systematic study, we discovered the need obtain o po experimental evidence on effective dog park design and management to enhance their benefits while mitigating their sources of conflict and limitations in the intensity of park visitors’ physical activity in off-leash areas. Guidelines for the design and management strategies for effective dog parks were made to enhance their benefits while alleviating conflicts in the future development of sustainable dog parks that promote healthy relationships between canines and residents in urban built environments. MDPI 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9455081/ /pubmed/36077971 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12172251 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Chen, Shuolei Wu, Zhuoran Sleipness, Ole Russell Wang, Hao Benefits and Conflicts: A Systematic Review of Dog Park Design and Management Strategies |
title | Benefits and Conflicts: A Systematic Review of Dog Park Design and Management Strategies |
title_full | Benefits and Conflicts: A Systematic Review of Dog Park Design and Management Strategies |
title_fullStr | Benefits and Conflicts: A Systematic Review of Dog Park Design and Management Strategies |
title_full_unstemmed | Benefits and Conflicts: A Systematic Review of Dog Park Design and Management Strategies |
title_short | Benefits and Conflicts: A Systematic Review of Dog Park Design and Management Strategies |
title_sort | benefits and conflicts: a systematic review of dog park design and management strategies |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9455081/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077971 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12172251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenshuolei benefitsandconflictsasystematicreviewofdogparkdesignandmanagementstrategies AT wuzhuoran benefitsandconflictsasystematicreviewofdogparkdesignandmanagementstrategies AT sleipnessolerussell benefitsandconflictsasystematicreviewofdogparkdesignandmanagementstrategies AT wanghao benefitsandconflictsasystematicreviewofdogparkdesignandmanagementstrategies |