Cargando…

Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories

Scientific software registries and repositories improve software findability and research transparency, provide information for software citations, and foster preservation of computational methods in a wide range of disciplines. Registries and repositories play a critical role by supporting research...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garijo, Daniel, Ménager, Hervé, Hwang, Lorraine, Trisovic, Ana, Hucka, Michael, Morrell, Thomas, Allen, Alice
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9455149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092012
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1023
_version_ 1784785521736679424
author Garijo, Daniel
Ménager, Hervé
Hwang, Lorraine
Trisovic, Ana
Hucka, Michael
Morrell, Thomas
Allen, Alice
author_facet Garijo, Daniel
Ménager, Hervé
Hwang, Lorraine
Trisovic, Ana
Hucka, Michael
Morrell, Thomas
Allen, Alice
author_sort Garijo, Daniel
collection PubMed
description Scientific software registries and repositories improve software findability and research transparency, provide information for software citations, and foster preservation of computational methods in a wide range of disciplines. Registries and repositories play a critical role by supporting research reproducibility and replicability, but developing them takes effort and few guidelines are available to help prospective creators of these resources. To address this need, the FORCE11 Software Citation Implementation Working Group convened a Task Force to distill the experiences of the managers of existing resources in setting expectations for all stakeholders. In this article, we describe the resultant best practices which include defining the scope, policies, and rules that govern individual registries and repositories, along with the background, examples, and collaborative work that went into their development. We believe that establishing specific policies such as those presented here will help other scientific software registries and repositories better serve their users and their disciplines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9455149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94551492022-09-09 Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories Garijo, Daniel Ménager, Hervé Hwang, Lorraine Trisovic, Ana Hucka, Michael Morrell, Thomas Allen, Alice PeerJ Comput Sci Computer Education Scientific software registries and repositories improve software findability and research transparency, provide information for software citations, and foster preservation of computational methods in a wide range of disciplines. Registries and repositories play a critical role by supporting research reproducibility and replicability, but developing them takes effort and few guidelines are available to help prospective creators of these resources. To address this need, the FORCE11 Software Citation Implementation Working Group convened a Task Force to distill the experiences of the managers of existing resources in setting expectations for all stakeholders. In this article, we describe the resultant best practices which include defining the scope, policies, and rules that govern individual registries and repositories, along with the background, examples, and collaborative work that went into their development. We believe that establishing specific policies such as those presented here will help other scientific software registries and repositories better serve their users and their disciplines. PeerJ Inc. 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9455149/ /pubmed/36092012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1023 Text en © 2022 Garijo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Computer Education
Garijo, Daniel
Ménager, Hervé
Hwang, Lorraine
Trisovic, Ana
Hucka, Michael
Morrell, Thomas
Allen, Alice
Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories
title Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories
title_full Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories
title_fullStr Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories
title_full_unstemmed Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories
title_short Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories
title_sort nine best practices for research software registries and repositories
topic Computer Education
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9455149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092012
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1023
work_keys_str_mv AT garijodaniel ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories
AT menagerherve ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories
AT hwanglorraine ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories
AT trisovicana ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories
AT huckamichael ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories
AT morrellthomas ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories
AT allenalice ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories
AT ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories
AT ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories