Cargando…
Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories
Scientific software registries and repositories improve software findability and research transparency, provide information for software citations, and foster preservation of computational methods in a wide range of disciplines. Registries and repositories play a critical role by supporting research...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9455149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1023 |
_version_ | 1784785521736679424 |
---|---|
author | Garijo, Daniel Ménager, Hervé Hwang, Lorraine Trisovic, Ana Hucka, Michael Morrell, Thomas Allen, Alice |
author_facet | Garijo, Daniel Ménager, Hervé Hwang, Lorraine Trisovic, Ana Hucka, Michael Morrell, Thomas Allen, Alice |
author_sort | Garijo, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Scientific software registries and repositories improve software findability and research transparency, provide information for software citations, and foster preservation of computational methods in a wide range of disciplines. Registries and repositories play a critical role by supporting research reproducibility and replicability, but developing them takes effort and few guidelines are available to help prospective creators of these resources. To address this need, the FORCE11 Software Citation Implementation Working Group convened a Task Force to distill the experiences of the managers of existing resources in setting expectations for all stakeholders. In this article, we describe the resultant best practices which include defining the scope, policies, and rules that govern individual registries and repositories, along with the background, examples, and collaborative work that went into their development. We believe that establishing specific policies such as those presented here will help other scientific software registries and repositories better serve their users and their disciplines. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9455149 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94551492022-09-09 Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories Garijo, Daniel Ménager, Hervé Hwang, Lorraine Trisovic, Ana Hucka, Michael Morrell, Thomas Allen, Alice PeerJ Comput Sci Computer Education Scientific software registries and repositories improve software findability and research transparency, provide information for software citations, and foster preservation of computational methods in a wide range of disciplines. Registries and repositories play a critical role by supporting research reproducibility and replicability, but developing them takes effort and few guidelines are available to help prospective creators of these resources. To address this need, the FORCE11 Software Citation Implementation Working Group convened a Task Force to distill the experiences of the managers of existing resources in setting expectations for all stakeholders. In this article, we describe the resultant best practices which include defining the scope, policies, and rules that govern individual registries and repositories, along with the background, examples, and collaborative work that went into their development. We believe that establishing specific policies such as those presented here will help other scientific software registries and repositories better serve their users and their disciplines. PeerJ Inc. 2022-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9455149/ /pubmed/36092012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1023 Text en © 2022 Garijo et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Computer Science) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Computer Education Garijo, Daniel Ménager, Hervé Hwang, Lorraine Trisovic, Ana Hucka, Michael Morrell, Thomas Allen, Alice Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories |
title | Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories |
title_full | Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories |
title_fullStr | Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories |
title_full_unstemmed | Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories |
title_short | Nine best practices for research software registries and repositories |
title_sort | nine best practices for research software registries and repositories |
topic | Computer Education |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9455149/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36092012 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.1023 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garijodaniel ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories AT menagerherve ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories AT hwanglorraine ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories AT trisovicana ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories AT huckamichael ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories AT morrellthomas ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories AT allenalice ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories AT ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories AT ninebestpracticesforresearchsoftwareregistriesandrepositories |