Cargando…

(11)C-Methionine PET/CT in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Comparison to (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Prognostic Value

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological malignancy and remains incurable despite therapeutic advances. (18)F-FDG (FDG) PET/CT is a relevant tool MM for staging and it is the reference imaging technique for treatment evaluation. However, it has limitations, and investigation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morales-Lozano, Maria I., Rodriguez-Otero, Paula, Sancho, Lidia, Nuñez-Cordoba, Jorge M., Prieto, Elena, Marcos-Jubilar, Maria, Rosales, Juan J., Alfonso, Ana, Guillen, Edgar F., San-Miguel, Jesus, Garcia-Velloso, Maria J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9456410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179895
_version_ 1784785808826302464
author Morales-Lozano, Maria I.
Rodriguez-Otero, Paula
Sancho, Lidia
Nuñez-Cordoba, Jorge M.
Prieto, Elena
Marcos-Jubilar, Maria
Rosales, Juan J.
Alfonso, Ana
Guillen, Edgar F.
San-Miguel, Jesus
Garcia-Velloso, Maria J.
author_facet Morales-Lozano, Maria I.
Rodriguez-Otero, Paula
Sancho, Lidia
Nuñez-Cordoba, Jorge M.
Prieto, Elena
Marcos-Jubilar, Maria
Rosales, Juan J.
Alfonso, Ana
Guillen, Edgar F.
San-Miguel, Jesus
Garcia-Velloso, Maria J.
author_sort Morales-Lozano, Maria I.
collection PubMed
description Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological malignancy and remains incurable despite therapeutic advances. (18)F-FDG (FDG) PET/CT is a relevant tool MM for staging and it is the reference imaging technique for treatment evaluation. However, it has limitations, and investigation of other PET tracers is required. Preliminary results with L-methyl-[(11)C]- methionine (MET), suggest higher sensitivity than (18)F-FDG. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of (1)FDG and MET in MM patients. We prospectively compared FDG and MET PET/CT for assessment of bone disease and extramedullary disease (EMD) in a series of 52 consecutive patients (8 smoldering MM, 18 newly diagnosed MM and 26 relapsed MM patients). Bone marrow (BM) uptake patterns and the detection of focal lesions (FLs) and EMD were compared. Furthermore, FDG PET parameters with known MM prognostic value were explored for both tracers, as well as total lesion MET uptake (TLMU). Median patient age was 61 years (range, 37–83 years), 54% were male, 13% of them were in stage ISS (International Staging System) III, and 31% had high-risk cytogenetics. FDG PET/CT did not detect active disease in 6 patients, while they were shown to be positive by MET PET/CT. Additionally, MET PET/CT identified a higher number of FLs than FDG in more than half of the patients (63%). For prognostication we focussed on the relapsed cohort, due to the low number of progressions in the two other cohorts. Upon using FDG PET/CT in relapsed patients, the presence of more than 3 FLs (HR 4.61, p = 0.056), more than 10 FLs (HR 5.65, p = 0.013), total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) p50 (HR 4.91, p = 0.049) or TMTV p75 (HR 5.32, p = 0.016) were associated with adverse prognosis. In MET PET/CT analysis, TMTV p50 (HR 4.71, p = 0.056), TMTV p75 (HR 6.27, p = 0.007), TLMU p50 (HR 8.8, p = 0.04) and TLMU p75 (HR 6.3, p = 0.007) adversely affected PFS. This study confirmed the diagnostic and prognostic value of FDG in MM. In addition, it highlights that MET has higher sensitivity than FDG PET/CT for detection of myeloma lesions, including FLs. Moreover, we show, for the first time, the prognostic value of TMTV and TLMU MET PET/CT in the imaging evaluation of MM patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9456410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94564102022-09-09 (11)C-Methionine PET/CT in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Comparison to (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Prognostic Value Morales-Lozano, Maria I. Rodriguez-Otero, Paula Sancho, Lidia Nuñez-Cordoba, Jorge M. Prieto, Elena Marcos-Jubilar, Maria Rosales, Juan J. Alfonso, Ana Guillen, Edgar F. San-Miguel, Jesus Garcia-Velloso, Maria J. Int J Mol Sci Article Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common haematological malignancy and remains incurable despite therapeutic advances. (18)F-FDG (FDG) PET/CT is a relevant tool MM for staging and it is the reference imaging technique for treatment evaluation. However, it has limitations, and investigation of other PET tracers is required. Preliminary results with L-methyl-[(11)C]- methionine (MET), suggest higher sensitivity than (18)F-FDG. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic value of (1)FDG and MET in MM patients. We prospectively compared FDG and MET PET/CT for assessment of bone disease and extramedullary disease (EMD) in a series of 52 consecutive patients (8 smoldering MM, 18 newly diagnosed MM and 26 relapsed MM patients). Bone marrow (BM) uptake patterns and the detection of focal lesions (FLs) and EMD were compared. Furthermore, FDG PET parameters with known MM prognostic value were explored for both tracers, as well as total lesion MET uptake (TLMU). Median patient age was 61 years (range, 37–83 years), 54% were male, 13% of them were in stage ISS (International Staging System) III, and 31% had high-risk cytogenetics. FDG PET/CT did not detect active disease in 6 patients, while they were shown to be positive by MET PET/CT. Additionally, MET PET/CT identified a higher number of FLs than FDG in more than half of the patients (63%). For prognostication we focussed on the relapsed cohort, due to the low number of progressions in the two other cohorts. Upon using FDG PET/CT in relapsed patients, the presence of more than 3 FLs (HR 4.61, p = 0.056), more than 10 FLs (HR 5.65, p = 0.013), total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) p50 (HR 4.91, p = 0.049) or TMTV p75 (HR 5.32, p = 0.016) were associated with adverse prognosis. In MET PET/CT analysis, TMTV p50 (HR 4.71, p = 0.056), TMTV p75 (HR 6.27, p = 0.007), TLMU p50 (HR 8.8, p = 0.04) and TLMU p75 (HR 6.3, p = 0.007) adversely affected PFS. This study confirmed the diagnostic and prognostic value of FDG in MM. In addition, it highlights that MET has higher sensitivity than FDG PET/CT for detection of myeloma lesions, including FLs. Moreover, we show, for the first time, the prognostic value of TMTV and TLMU MET PET/CT in the imaging evaluation of MM patients. MDPI 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9456410/ /pubmed/36077292 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179895 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Morales-Lozano, Maria I.
Rodriguez-Otero, Paula
Sancho, Lidia
Nuñez-Cordoba, Jorge M.
Prieto, Elena
Marcos-Jubilar, Maria
Rosales, Juan J.
Alfonso, Ana
Guillen, Edgar F.
San-Miguel, Jesus
Garcia-Velloso, Maria J.
(11)C-Methionine PET/CT in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Comparison to (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Prognostic Value
title (11)C-Methionine PET/CT in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Comparison to (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Prognostic Value
title_full (11)C-Methionine PET/CT in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Comparison to (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Prognostic Value
title_fullStr (11)C-Methionine PET/CT in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Comparison to (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Prognostic Value
title_full_unstemmed (11)C-Methionine PET/CT in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Comparison to (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Prognostic Value
title_short (11)C-Methionine PET/CT in Assessment of Multiple Myeloma Patients: Comparison to (18)F-FDG PET/CT and Prognostic Value
title_sort (11)c-methionine pet/ct in assessment of multiple myeloma patients: comparison to (18)f-fdg pet/ct and prognostic value
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9456410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077292
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179895
work_keys_str_mv AT moraleslozanomariai 11cmethioninepetctinassessmentofmultiplemyelomapatientscomparisonto18ffdgpetctandprognosticvalue
AT rodriguezoteropaula 11cmethioninepetctinassessmentofmultiplemyelomapatientscomparisonto18ffdgpetctandprognosticvalue
AT sancholidia 11cmethioninepetctinassessmentofmultiplemyelomapatientscomparisonto18ffdgpetctandprognosticvalue
AT nunezcordobajorgem 11cmethioninepetctinassessmentofmultiplemyelomapatientscomparisonto18ffdgpetctandprognosticvalue
AT prietoelena 11cmethioninepetctinassessmentofmultiplemyelomapatientscomparisonto18ffdgpetctandprognosticvalue
AT marcosjubilarmaria 11cmethioninepetctinassessmentofmultiplemyelomapatientscomparisonto18ffdgpetctandprognosticvalue
AT rosalesjuanj 11cmethioninepetctinassessmentofmultiplemyelomapatientscomparisonto18ffdgpetctandprognosticvalue
AT alfonsoana 11cmethioninepetctinassessmentofmultiplemyelomapatientscomparisonto18ffdgpetctandprognosticvalue
AT guillenedgarf 11cmethioninepetctinassessmentofmultiplemyelomapatientscomparisonto18ffdgpetctandprognosticvalue
AT sanmigueljesus 11cmethioninepetctinassessmentofmultiplemyelomapatientscomparisonto18ffdgpetctandprognosticvalue
AT garciavellosomariaj 11cmethioninepetctinassessmentofmultiplemyelomapatientscomparisonto18ffdgpetctandprognosticvalue