Cargando…

Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash

The aim of the article is to compare two types of fly ash (from the fluidized and pulverized coal combustion process) as a filler for rigid polyurethane foam. Pulverized fly ash (PFA) is widely used in building materials, while fluidized fly ash (FFA) is not currently recycled, but landfilled. The p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuźnia, Monika, Zygmunt-Kowalska, Beata, Szajding, Artur, Magiera, Anna, Stanik, Rafał, Gude, Maik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9456515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179725
_version_ 1784785834059235328
author Kuźnia, Monika
Zygmunt-Kowalska, Beata
Szajding, Artur
Magiera, Anna
Stanik, Rafał
Gude, Maik
author_facet Kuźnia, Monika
Zygmunt-Kowalska, Beata
Szajding, Artur
Magiera, Anna
Stanik, Rafał
Gude, Maik
author_sort Kuźnia, Monika
collection PubMed
description The aim of the article is to compare two types of fly ash (from the fluidized and pulverized coal combustion process) as a filler for rigid polyurethane foam. Pulverized fly ash (PFA) is widely used in building materials, while fluidized fly ash (FFA) is not currently recycled, but landfilled. The produced rigid polyurethane foams were reinforced with 5 and 10% by weight addition of fly ash from two different types of boilers. The foaming process, physical properties, morphologies and thermal degradation were subject to comparative analysis. The research indicated that fly ash intensifies the reactions of foam synthesis, most commonly, polyurethane (PU) foam with an addition of 10% PFA. What is interesting is that both ashes can be used in PU foam technology as they do not cause deterioration of the physical parameters. As shown, the addition of filler affects the morphology and impairs the brittleness. Additionally, the use of fly ash from coal combustion in the technology of polyurethane materials complies with the guidelines of the circular economy stated in the European Union legislation. Partial replacement of petrochemical components with waste filler also reduces the total energy consumption in the production of PU composites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9456515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94565152022-09-09 Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash Kuźnia, Monika Zygmunt-Kowalska, Beata Szajding, Artur Magiera, Anna Stanik, Rafał Gude, Maik Int J Mol Sci Article The aim of the article is to compare two types of fly ash (from the fluidized and pulverized coal combustion process) as a filler for rigid polyurethane foam. Pulverized fly ash (PFA) is widely used in building materials, while fluidized fly ash (FFA) is not currently recycled, but landfilled. The produced rigid polyurethane foams were reinforced with 5 and 10% by weight addition of fly ash from two different types of boilers. The foaming process, physical properties, morphologies and thermal degradation were subject to comparative analysis. The research indicated that fly ash intensifies the reactions of foam synthesis, most commonly, polyurethane (PU) foam with an addition of 10% PFA. What is interesting is that both ashes can be used in PU foam technology as they do not cause deterioration of the physical parameters. As shown, the addition of filler affects the morphology and impairs the brittleness. Additionally, the use of fly ash from coal combustion in the technology of polyurethane materials complies with the guidelines of the circular economy stated in the European Union legislation. Partial replacement of petrochemical components with waste filler also reduces the total energy consumption in the production of PU composites. MDPI 2022-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9456515/ /pubmed/36077123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179725 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kuźnia, Monika
Zygmunt-Kowalska, Beata
Szajding, Artur
Magiera, Anna
Stanik, Rafał
Gude, Maik
Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash
title Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash
title_full Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash
title_fullStr Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash
title_short Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash
title_sort comparative study on selected properties of modified polyurethane foam with fly ash
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9456515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179725
work_keys_str_mv AT kuzniamonika comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash
AT zygmuntkowalskabeata comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash
AT szajdingartur comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash
AT magieraanna comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash
AT stanikrafał comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash
AT gudemaik comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash