Cargando…
Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash
The aim of the article is to compare two types of fly ash (from the fluidized and pulverized coal combustion process) as a filler for rigid polyurethane foam. Pulverized fly ash (PFA) is widely used in building materials, while fluidized fly ash (FFA) is not currently recycled, but landfilled. The p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9456515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179725 |
_version_ | 1784785834059235328 |
---|---|
author | Kuźnia, Monika Zygmunt-Kowalska, Beata Szajding, Artur Magiera, Anna Stanik, Rafał Gude, Maik |
author_facet | Kuźnia, Monika Zygmunt-Kowalska, Beata Szajding, Artur Magiera, Anna Stanik, Rafał Gude, Maik |
author_sort | Kuźnia, Monika |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the article is to compare two types of fly ash (from the fluidized and pulverized coal combustion process) as a filler for rigid polyurethane foam. Pulverized fly ash (PFA) is widely used in building materials, while fluidized fly ash (FFA) is not currently recycled, but landfilled. The produced rigid polyurethane foams were reinforced with 5 and 10% by weight addition of fly ash from two different types of boilers. The foaming process, physical properties, morphologies and thermal degradation were subject to comparative analysis. The research indicated that fly ash intensifies the reactions of foam synthesis, most commonly, polyurethane (PU) foam with an addition of 10% PFA. What is interesting is that both ashes can be used in PU foam technology as they do not cause deterioration of the physical parameters. As shown, the addition of filler affects the morphology and impairs the brittleness. Additionally, the use of fly ash from coal combustion in the technology of polyurethane materials complies with the guidelines of the circular economy stated in the European Union legislation. Partial replacement of petrochemical components with waste filler also reduces the total energy consumption in the production of PU composites. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9456515 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94565152022-09-09 Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash Kuźnia, Monika Zygmunt-Kowalska, Beata Szajding, Artur Magiera, Anna Stanik, Rafał Gude, Maik Int J Mol Sci Article The aim of the article is to compare two types of fly ash (from the fluidized and pulverized coal combustion process) as a filler for rigid polyurethane foam. Pulverized fly ash (PFA) is widely used in building materials, while fluidized fly ash (FFA) is not currently recycled, but landfilled. The produced rigid polyurethane foams were reinforced with 5 and 10% by weight addition of fly ash from two different types of boilers. The foaming process, physical properties, morphologies and thermal degradation were subject to comparative analysis. The research indicated that fly ash intensifies the reactions of foam synthesis, most commonly, polyurethane (PU) foam with an addition of 10% PFA. What is interesting is that both ashes can be used in PU foam technology as they do not cause deterioration of the physical parameters. As shown, the addition of filler affects the morphology and impairs the brittleness. Additionally, the use of fly ash from coal combustion in the technology of polyurethane materials complies with the guidelines of the circular economy stated in the European Union legislation. Partial replacement of petrochemical components with waste filler also reduces the total energy consumption in the production of PU composites. MDPI 2022-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9456515/ /pubmed/36077123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179725 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kuźnia, Monika Zygmunt-Kowalska, Beata Szajding, Artur Magiera, Anna Stanik, Rafał Gude, Maik Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash |
title | Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash |
title_full | Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash |
title_short | Comparative Study on Selected Properties of Modified Polyurethane Foam with Fly Ash |
title_sort | comparative study on selected properties of modified polyurethane foam with fly ash |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9456515/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36077123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms23179725 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kuzniamonika comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash AT zygmuntkowalskabeata comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash AT szajdingartur comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash AT magieraanna comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash AT stanikrafał comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash AT gudemaik comparativestudyonselectedpropertiesofmodifiedpolyurethanefoamwithflyash |