Cargando…

Tube–Iris Distance and Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage Following Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation

The most significant factor for endothelial cell loss should be readily identified, since prevention is the most crucial treatment. Here, we investigate risk factors for corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) decline following Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation and determine the optimal cut-off...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Yitak, Cho, Won Jeong, Kim, Jung Dong, Cho, Hyuna, Bae, Hyoung Won, Kim, Chan Yun, Choi, Wungrak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9456630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078987
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175057
_version_ 1784785863267319808
author Kim, Yitak
Cho, Won Jeong
Kim, Jung Dong
Cho, Hyuna
Bae, Hyoung Won
Kim, Chan Yun
Choi, Wungrak
author_facet Kim, Yitak
Cho, Won Jeong
Kim, Jung Dong
Cho, Hyuna
Bae, Hyoung Won
Kim, Chan Yun
Choi, Wungrak
author_sort Kim, Yitak
collection PubMed
description The most significant factor for endothelial cell loss should be readily identified, since prevention is the most crucial treatment. Here, we investigate risk factors for corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) decline following Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation and determine the optimal cut-off values. This study included 103 eyes (95 patients) with glaucoma that underwent AGV implantation between January 2006 and January 2021 at a single medical center (Severance Hospital). We conducted consecutive t-tests between two groups separated by the ECD change rate to determine the survival state of the enrolled patients. Associations were evaluated using univariable and multivariable linear regressions. Optimal cut-off values for identified risk factors were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on logistic regression. Mean follow-up duration was 4.09 ± 2.20 years. After implementing consecutive t-tests, only patients with an ECD change rate greater than −6.1%/year were considered to have survived. Tube–iris distance (TID) was the only statistically significant factor identified in both the univariable and multivariable linear regressions. The cut-off value determined from the consecutive Cox regression method was 0.33 mm (smallest p-value of 0.0087), and the cut-off value determined from the ROC method was 0.371 mm (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.662). Patients with short TIDs showed a better ECD prognosis following AGV surgery; we suggest optimal TID cut-off values of 0.33 mm and 0.371 mm based on the implemented Cox regression and ROC methodology, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9456630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94566302022-09-09 Tube–Iris Distance and Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage Following Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation Kim, Yitak Cho, Won Jeong Kim, Jung Dong Cho, Hyuna Bae, Hyoung Won Kim, Chan Yun Choi, Wungrak J Clin Med Article The most significant factor for endothelial cell loss should be readily identified, since prevention is the most crucial treatment. Here, we investigate risk factors for corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) decline following Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation and determine the optimal cut-off values. This study included 103 eyes (95 patients) with glaucoma that underwent AGV implantation between January 2006 and January 2021 at a single medical center (Severance Hospital). We conducted consecutive t-tests between two groups separated by the ECD change rate to determine the survival state of the enrolled patients. Associations were evaluated using univariable and multivariable linear regressions. Optimal cut-off values for identified risk factors were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve based on logistic regression. Mean follow-up duration was 4.09 ± 2.20 years. After implementing consecutive t-tests, only patients with an ECD change rate greater than −6.1%/year were considered to have survived. Tube–iris distance (TID) was the only statistically significant factor identified in both the univariable and multivariable linear regressions. The cut-off value determined from the consecutive Cox regression method was 0.33 mm (smallest p-value of 0.0087), and the cut-off value determined from the ROC method was 0.371 mm (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.662). Patients with short TIDs showed a better ECD prognosis following AGV surgery; we suggest optimal TID cut-off values of 0.33 mm and 0.371 mm based on the implemented Cox regression and ROC methodology, respectively. MDPI 2022-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9456630/ /pubmed/36078987 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175057 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Yitak
Cho, Won Jeong
Kim, Jung Dong
Cho, Hyuna
Bae, Hyoung Won
Kim, Chan Yun
Choi, Wungrak
Tube–Iris Distance and Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage Following Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation
title Tube–Iris Distance and Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage Following Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation
title_full Tube–Iris Distance and Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage Following Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation
title_fullStr Tube–Iris Distance and Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage Following Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation
title_full_unstemmed Tube–Iris Distance and Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage Following Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation
title_short Tube–Iris Distance and Corneal Endothelial Cell Damage Following Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation
title_sort tube–iris distance and corneal endothelial cell damage following ahmed glaucoma valve implantation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9456630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078987
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175057
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyitak tubeirisdistanceandcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowingahmedglaucomavalveimplantation
AT chowonjeong tubeirisdistanceandcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowingahmedglaucomavalveimplantation
AT kimjungdong tubeirisdistanceandcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowingahmedglaucomavalveimplantation
AT chohyuna tubeirisdistanceandcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowingahmedglaucomavalveimplantation
AT baehyoungwon tubeirisdistanceandcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowingahmedglaucomavalveimplantation
AT kimchanyun tubeirisdistanceandcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowingahmedglaucomavalveimplantation
AT choiwungrak tubeirisdistanceandcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowingahmedglaucomavalveimplantation