Cargando…
A Comparison of the Effect of a 4.4-MHz Radiofrequency Deep Heating Therapy and Ultrasound on Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial
Despite the increasing interest in RF (Radiofrequency) therapy, little is known about its effectiveness for low back pain (LBP). The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of 4.4-MHz RF diathermy compared to ultrasound (US) in patients with LBP. One-hundred-and-eighteen patients with...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9457341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175011 |
_version_ | 1784786031420112896 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Jung Hwan Do, Jong Geol Park, Hee Jin Lee, Yong-Taek Kim, Sang Jun |
author_facet | Lee, Jung Hwan Do, Jong Geol Park, Hee Jin Lee, Yong-Taek Kim, Sang Jun |
author_sort | Lee, Jung Hwan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite the increasing interest in RF (Radiofrequency) therapy, little is known about its effectiveness for low back pain (LBP). The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of 4.4-MHz RF diathermy compared to ultrasound (US) in patients with LBP. One-hundred-and-eighteen patients with LBP were randomized with RF (n = 62) or US (n = 56). Investigator and subjects were blinded to the treatment group. Either RF (4.4 MHz, 45 W/cm(2)) or US (1 MHz, 2 W/cm(2)) was applied for 10 to 15 min, 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, %). Secondary outcomes were numeric rating scale (NRS), Biering–Sorensen test, up-and-go test, successful pain relief, and successful functional improvement. Clinical outcomes were evaluated prior to intervention (baseline), and at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Both groups observed a significant improvement of ODI (%), NRS, Biering–Sorensen test, and up-and-go test at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment (p < 0.05); however, no significant differences were found between groups. The RF group showed a higher proportion of successful pain relief at 12 weeks after treatment than the US group (p = 0.048). The RF diathermy showed favorable results in pain reduction, improvement of function, mobility, and back muscle endurance. Compared with US, RF diathermy obtained slightly better perception of patients in pain relief at 12 weeks after treatment. The results from this study indicated that 4.4-MHz RF diathermy can effectively be used as a conservative treatment option for patients with LBP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9457341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94573412022-09-09 A Comparison of the Effect of a 4.4-MHz Radiofrequency Deep Heating Therapy and Ultrasound on Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial Lee, Jung Hwan Do, Jong Geol Park, Hee Jin Lee, Yong-Taek Kim, Sang Jun J Clin Med Article Despite the increasing interest in RF (Radiofrequency) therapy, little is known about its effectiveness for low back pain (LBP). The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of 4.4-MHz RF diathermy compared to ultrasound (US) in patients with LBP. One-hundred-and-eighteen patients with LBP were randomized with RF (n = 62) or US (n = 56). Investigator and subjects were blinded to the treatment group. Either RF (4.4 MHz, 45 W/cm(2)) or US (1 MHz, 2 W/cm(2)) was applied for 10 to 15 min, 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, %). Secondary outcomes were numeric rating scale (NRS), Biering–Sorensen test, up-and-go test, successful pain relief, and successful functional improvement. Clinical outcomes were evaluated prior to intervention (baseline), and at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding baseline demographic and clinical characteristics. Both groups observed a significant improvement of ODI (%), NRS, Biering–Sorensen test, and up-and-go test at 4 and 12 weeks after treatment (p < 0.05); however, no significant differences were found between groups. The RF group showed a higher proportion of successful pain relief at 12 weeks after treatment than the US group (p = 0.048). The RF diathermy showed favorable results in pain reduction, improvement of function, mobility, and back muscle endurance. Compared with US, RF diathermy obtained slightly better perception of patients in pain relief at 12 weeks after treatment. The results from this study indicated that 4.4-MHz RF diathermy can effectively be used as a conservative treatment option for patients with LBP. MDPI 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9457341/ /pubmed/36078940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175011 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Lee, Jung Hwan Do, Jong Geol Park, Hee Jin Lee, Yong-Taek Kim, Sang Jun A Comparison of the Effect of a 4.4-MHz Radiofrequency Deep Heating Therapy and Ultrasound on Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial |
title | A Comparison of the Effect of a 4.4-MHz Radiofrequency Deep Heating Therapy and Ultrasound on Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial |
title_full | A Comparison of the Effect of a 4.4-MHz Radiofrequency Deep Heating Therapy and Ultrasound on Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of the Effect of a 4.4-MHz Radiofrequency Deep Heating Therapy and Ultrasound on Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of the Effect of a 4.4-MHz Radiofrequency Deep Heating Therapy and Ultrasound on Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial |
title_short | A Comparison of the Effect of a 4.4-MHz Radiofrequency Deep Heating Therapy and Ultrasound on Low Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial |
title_sort | comparison of the effect of a 4.4-mhz radiofrequency deep heating therapy and ultrasound on low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9457341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36078940 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leejunghwan acomparisonoftheeffectofa44mhzradiofrequencydeepheatingtherapyandultrasoundonlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindmulticentertrial AT dojonggeol acomparisonoftheeffectofa44mhzradiofrequencydeepheatingtherapyandultrasoundonlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindmulticentertrial AT parkheejin acomparisonoftheeffectofa44mhzradiofrequencydeepheatingtherapyandultrasoundonlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindmulticentertrial AT leeyongtaek acomparisonoftheeffectofa44mhzradiofrequencydeepheatingtherapyandultrasoundonlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindmulticentertrial AT kimsangjun acomparisonoftheeffectofa44mhzradiofrequencydeepheatingtherapyandultrasoundonlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindmulticentertrial AT leejunghwan comparisonoftheeffectofa44mhzradiofrequencydeepheatingtherapyandultrasoundonlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindmulticentertrial AT dojonggeol comparisonoftheeffectofa44mhzradiofrequencydeepheatingtherapyandultrasoundonlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindmulticentertrial AT parkheejin comparisonoftheeffectofa44mhzradiofrequencydeepheatingtherapyandultrasoundonlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindmulticentertrial AT leeyongtaek comparisonoftheeffectofa44mhzradiofrequencydeepheatingtherapyandultrasoundonlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindmulticentertrial AT kimsangjun comparisonoftheeffectofa44mhzradiofrequencydeepheatingtherapyandultrasoundonlowbackpainarandomizeddoubleblindmulticentertrial |