Cargando…
Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?
Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and its miniaturized modifications are usually considered the standard surgical options for large (>20 mm) staghorn and infected stones. Moreover, PCNL is a viable alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for smaller stones (<20 mm) in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9457409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36079083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175157 |
_version_ | 1784786047992856576 |
---|---|
author | De Lorenzis, Elisa Zanetti, Stefano Paolo Boeri, Luca Montanari, Emanuele |
author_facet | De Lorenzis, Elisa Zanetti, Stefano Paolo Boeri, Luca Montanari, Emanuele |
author_sort | De Lorenzis, Elisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and its miniaturized modifications are usually considered the standard surgical options for large (>20 mm) staghorn and infected stones. Moreover, PCNL is a viable alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for smaller stones (<20 mm) in the presence of anatomical malformations or inaccessible lower pole stones. However, due to the advancements in laser and scope technology, RIRS is expanding its indications with the potential benefits of lower complications and a shorter hospital stay. Methods: A literature search using the PUBMED database from inception to June 2022 was performed to explore the current role of PCNL in endourology. The analysis involved a narrative synthesis. Results: PCNL confirmed its role in the treatment of large and complex stones; moreover, miniaturized PCNL has become more competitive, gaining space among classic indications of flexible ureteroscopy. Conclusions: considering all the evaluated subgroups, we can conclude that PCNL is an old fascinating procedure and is here to stay. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9457409 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94574092022-09-09 Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times? De Lorenzis, Elisa Zanetti, Stefano Paolo Boeri, Luca Montanari, Emanuele J Clin Med Review Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and its miniaturized modifications are usually considered the standard surgical options for large (>20 mm) staghorn and infected stones. Moreover, PCNL is a viable alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for smaller stones (<20 mm) in the presence of anatomical malformations or inaccessible lower pole stones. However, due to the advancements in laser and scope technology, RIRS is expanding its indications with the potential benefits of lower complications and a shorter hospital stay. Methods: A literature search using the PUBMED database from inception to June 2022 was performed to explore the current role of PCNL in endourology. The analysis involved a narrative synthesis. Results: PCNL confirmed its role in the treatment of large and complex stones; moreover, miniaturized PCNL has become more competitive, gaining space among classic indications of flexible ureteroscopy. Conclusions: considering all the evaluated subgroups, we can conclude that PCNL is an old fascinating procedure and is here to stay. MDPI 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9457409/ /pubmed/36079083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175157 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review De Lorenzis, Elisa Zanetti, Stefano Paolo Boeri, Luca Montanari, Emanuele Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times? |
title | Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times? |
title_full | Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times? |
title_fullStr | Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times? |
title_full_unstemmed | Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times? |
title_short | Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times? |
title_sort | is there still a place for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in current times? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9457409/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36079083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delorenziselisa istherestillaplaceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyincurrenttimes AT zanettistefanopaolo istherestillaplaceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyincurrenttimes AT boeriluca istherestillaplaceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyincurrenttimes AT montanariemanuele istherestillaplaceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyincurrenttimes |