Cargando…

Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and its miniaturized modifications are usually considered the standard surgical options for large (>20 mm) staghorn and infected stones. Moreover, PCNL is a viable alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for smaller stones (<20 mm) in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Lorenzis, Elisa, Zanetti, Stefano Paolo, Boeri, Luca, Montanari, Emanuele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9457409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36079083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175157
_version_ 1784786047992856576
author De Lorenzis, Elisa
Zanetti, Stefano Paolo
Boeri, Luca
Montanari, Emanuele
author_facet De Lorenzis, Elisa
Zanetti, Stefano Paolo
Boeri, Luca
Montanari, Emanuele
author_sort De Lorenzis, Elisa
collection PubMed
description Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and its miniaturized modifications are usually considered the standard surgical options for large (>20 mm) staghorn and infected stones. Moreover, PCNL is a viable alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for smaller stones (<20 mm) in the presence of anatomical malformations or inaccessible lower pole stones. However, due to the advancements in laser and scope technology, RIRS is expanding its indications with the potential benefits of lower complications and a shorter hospital stay. Methods: A literature search using the PUBMED database from inception to June 2022 was performed to explore the current role of PCNL in endourology. The analysis involved a narrative synthesis. Results: PCNL confirmed its role in the treatment of large and complex stones; moreover, miniaturized PCNL has become more competitive, gaining space among classic indications of flexible ureteroscopy. Conclusions: considering all the evaluated subgroups, we can conclude that PCNL is an old fascinating procedure and is here to stay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9457409
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94574092022-09-09 Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times? De Lorenzis, Elisa Zanetti, Stefano Paolo Boeri, Luca Montanari, Emanuele J Clin Med Review Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and its miniaturized modifications are usually considered the standard surgical options for large (>20 mm) staghorn and infected stones. Moreover, PCNL is a viable alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for smaller stones (<20 mm) in the presence of anatomical malformations or inaccessible lower pole stones. However, due to the advancements in laser and scope technology, RIRS is expanding its indications with the potential benefits of lower complications and a shorter hospital stay. Methods: A literature search using the PUBMED database from inception to June 2022 was performed to explore the current role of PCNL in endourology. The analysis involved a narrative synthesis. Results: PCNL confirmed its role in the treatment of large and complex stones; moreover, miniaturized PCNL has become more competitive, gaining space among classic indications of flexible ureteroscopy. Conclusions: considering all the evaluated subgroups, we can conclude that PCNL is an old fascinating procedure and is here to stay. MDPI 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9457409/ /pubmed/36079083 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175157 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
De Lorenzis, Elisa
Zanetti, Stefano Paolo
Boeri, Luca
Montanari, Emanuele
Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?
title Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?
title_full Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?
title_fullStr Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?
title_full_unstemmed Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?
title_short Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?
title_sort is there still a place for percutaneous nephrolithotomy in current times?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9457409/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36079083
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm11175157
work_keys_str_mv AT delorenziselisa istherestillaplaceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyincurrenttimes
AT zanettistefanopaolo istherestillaplaceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyincurrenttimes
AT boeriluca istherestillaplaceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyincurrenttimes
AT montanariemanuele istherestillaplaceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomyincurrenttimes