Cargando…

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in the serum of patients with triple-negative breast carcinoma: prognostic value of this biomarker

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression has been considered a poor prognostic factor in breast cancer. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study of 206 women with breast cancer analysed by stages (I, II, III and IV) and by immunohistochemical subtype (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2+ an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Araújo, Rogério Agenor, da Luz, Felipe Andrés Cordero, da Costa Marinho, Eduarda, Nascimento, Camila Piqui, de Andrade Marques, Lara, Delfino, Patrícia Ferreira Ribeiro, Antonioli, Rafael Mathias, Araújo, Breno Jeha, da Silva, Ana Cristina Araújo Lemos, dos Reis Monteiro, Maria Luiza Gonçalves, Neto, Morun Bernardino, Silva, Marcelo José Barbosa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cancer Intelligence 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9458269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36158981
http://dx.doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2022.1431
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression has been considered a poor prognostic factor in breast cancer. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study of 206 women with breast cancer analysed by stages (I, II, III and IV) and by immunohistochemical subtype (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2+ and triple-negative (TN)); 89 healthy controls with normal recent mammography were included. The EGFR measured in the serum (sEGFR) was detected by the Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) method (R&D Systems kit DY231) collected by blood before any treatment in patients. Kaplan–Meier method and Cox regression were carried out to obtain the prognostic value, considering significance if p < 0.05. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 36.6 months, 47 deaths occurred. Multivariable Cox regression showed difference of overall survival (OS) associated with sEGFR levels (sEGFR ≤ or > 47.8 ng/mL) in patients with TN cancers, but not of Luminal A, Luminal B or HER2+ subtypes; adjusted by stage, the death risk increased by approximately 415% [hazard ratio (HR): 5.149 (1.900–13.955), p = 0.001] for patients with sEGFR > 47.8 ng/mL compared to patients with a lower sEGFR value. There was no significant correlation of sEGFR with staging, histological tumour grade (G1/G2/G3), Ki67 (< or ≥14%) or body mass index. CONCLUSIONS: Increased sEGFR expression in patients with TN tumours is a significant predictor of lower OS and its quantification is inexpensive and straightforward.