Cargando…

Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE: Endovascular stenting has been used to manage superior vena cava syndrome for several decades and has become standard firstline practice. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of endovascular stenting in the management of superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aung, Eri Yin-Soe, Khan, Maha, Williams, Norman, Raja, Usman, Hamady, Mohamad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9458578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03178-z
_version_ 1784786323003932672
author Aung, Eri Yin-Soe
Khan, Maha
Williams, Norman
Raja, Usman
Hamady, Mohamad
author_facet Aung, Eri Yin-Soe
Khan, Maha
Williams, Norman
Raja, Usman
Hamady, Mohamad
author_sort Aung, Eri Yin-Soe
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Endovascular stenting has been used to manage superior vena cava syndrome for several decades and has become standard firstline practice. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of endovascular stenting in the management of superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PUBMED online databases were searched, with studies involving more than ten adult patients included. Studies identified spanned 27 years, from 1993 to 2020. Meta-analyses were performed based on Clopper–Pearson estimation. RESULTS: Fifty-four studies were identified, for a total of 2249 patients, of which 2015 had malignant SVCS and 222 benign SVCS. Pooled technical success and clinical success rates were 96.8% (95% CI 96.0–97.5%) and 92.8% (95% CI 91.7–93.8%). Technical success and clinical success rates for studies investigating benign SVCS alone were identical at 88.8% (95% CI 83.0–93.1%). Pooled patency remained above 90% for the first year. Average complication and re-intervention rates were 5.78% (SD = 9.3182) and 9.11% (SD = 11.190). CONCLUSIONS: This review confirms the effectiveness of endovascular stenting in managing SVCS. Further directions of research may include specific outcomes of endovascular stenting in benign SVCS, and the impact of procedural characteristics, such as the use of anticoagulation and type of stent used, on outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of retrospective cohort studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9458578
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94585782022-09-10 Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Aung, Eri Yin-Soe Khan, Maha Williams, Norman Raja, Usman Hamady, Mohamad Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Review PURPOSE: Endovascular stenting has been used to manage superior vena cava syndrome for several decades and has become standard firstline practice. This study aims to investigate the outcomes of endovascular stenting in the management of superior vena cava syndrome (SVCS). METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and PUBMED online databases were searched, with studies involving more than ten adult patients included. Studies identified spanned 27 years, from 1993 to 2020. Meta-analyses were performed based on Clopper–Pearson estimation. RESULTS: Fifty-four studies were identified, for a total of 2249 patients, of which 2015 had malignant SVCS and 222 benign SVCS. Pooled technical success and clinical success rates were 96.8% (95% CI 96.0–97.5%) and 92.8% (95% CI 91.7–93.8%). Technical success and clinical success rates for studies investigating benign SVCS alone were identical at 88.8% (95% CI 83.0–93.1%). Pooled patency remained above 90% for the first year. Average complication and re-intervention rates were 5.78% (SD = 9.3182) and 9.11% (SD = 11.190). CONCLUSIONS: This review confirms the effectiveness of endovascular stenting in managing SVCS. Further directions of research may include specific outcomes of endovascular stenting in benign SVCS, and the impact of procedural characteristics, such as the use of anticoagulation and type of stent used, on outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, systematic review of retrospective cohort studies. Springer US 2022-07-12 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9458578/ /pubmed/35821122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03178-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Aung, Eri Yin-Soe
Khan, Maha
Williams, Norman
Raja, Usman
Hamady, Mohamad
Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Endovascular Stenting in Superior Vena Cava Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort endovascular stenting in superior vena cava syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9458578/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35821122
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03178-z
work_keys_str_mv AT aungeriyinsoe endovascularstentinginsuperiorvenacavasyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT khanmaha endovascularstentinginsuperiorvenacavasyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT williamsnorman endovascularstentinginsuperiorvenacavasyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rajausman endovascularstentinginsuperiorvenacavasyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hamadymohamad endovascularstentinginsuperiorvenacavasyndromeasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis