Cargando…

Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal ultrasound (US) cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries intima media thickness (IMT) to discriminate between patients with and without giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Retrospective observational study including patients referred to an US fast-tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López-Gloria, Katerine, Castrejón, Isabel, Nieto-González, Juan Carlos, Rodríguez-Merlos, Pablo, Serrano-Benavente, Belén, González, Carlos Manuel, Monteagudo Sáez, Indalecio, González, Teresa, Álvaro-Gracia, José María, Molina-Collada, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.981804
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal ultrasound (US) cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries intima media thickness (IMT) to discriminate between patients with and without giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Retrospective observational study including patients referred to an US fast-track clinic. All patients underwent bilateral US examination of the cranial and extracranial arteries including the IMT measurement. Clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months was considered the gold standard for diagnosis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to select the cut-off values on the basis of the best tradeoff values between sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were included, 47 (29.9%) with clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months. 41 (87.2%) of patients with GCA had positive US findings (61.7% had cranial and 44.7% extracranial involvement). The best threshold IMT values were 0.44 mm for the common temporal artery; 0.34 mm for the frontal branch; 0.36 mm for the parietal branch; 1.1 mm for the carotid artery and 1 mm for the subclavian and axillary arteries. The areas under the ROC curves were greater for axillary arteries 0.996 (95% CI 0.991–1), for parietal branch 0.991 (95% CI 0.980–1), for subclavian 0.990 (95% CI 0.979–1), for frontal branch 0.989 (95% CI 0.976–1), for common temporal artery 0.984 (95% CI 0.959–1) and for common carotid arteries 0.977 (95% CI 0.961–0.993). CONCLUSION: IMT cut-off values have been identified for each artery. These proposed IMT cut-off values may help to improve the diagnostic accuracy of US in clinical practice.