Cargando…
Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis
OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal ultrasound (US) cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries intima media thickness (IMT) to discriminate between patients with and without giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Retrospective observational study including patients referred to an US fast-tra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.981804 |
_version_ | 1784786425430933504 |
---|---|
author | López-Gloria, Katerine Castrejón, Isabel Nieto-González, Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Merlos, Pablo Serrano-Benavente, Belén González, Carlos Manuel Monteagudo Sáez, Indalecio González, Teresa Álvaro-Gracia, José María Molina-Collada, Juan |
author_facet | López-Gloria, Katerine Castrejón, Isabel Nieto-González, Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Merlos, Pablo Serrano-Benavente, Belén González, Carlos Manuel Monteagudo Sáez, Indalecio González, Teresa Álvaro-Gracia, José María Molina-Collada, Juan |
author_sort | López-Gloria, Katerine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal ultrasound (US) cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries intima media thickness (IMT) to discriminate between patients with and without giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Retrospective observational study including patients referred to an US fast-track clinic. All patients underwent bilateral US examination of the cranial and extracranial arteries including the IMT measurement. Clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months was considered the gold standard for diagnosis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to select the cut-off values on the basis of the best tradeoff values between sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were included, 47 (29.9%) with clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months. 41 (87.2%) of patients with GCA had positive US findings (61.7% had cranial and 44.7% extracranial involvement). The best threshold IMT values were 0.44 mm for the common temporal artery; 0.34 mm for the frontal branch; 0.36 mm for the parietal branch; 1.1 mm for the carotid artery and 1 mm for the subclavian and axillary arteries. The areas under the ROC curves were greater for axillary arteries 0.996 (95% CI 0.991–1), for parietal branch 0.991 (95% CI 0.980–1), for subclavian 0.990 (95% CI 0.979–1), for frontal branch 0.989 (95% CI 0.976–1), for common temporal artery 0.984 (95% CI 0.959–1) and for common carotid arteries 0.977 (95% CI 0.961–0.993). CONCLUSION: IMT cut-off values have been identified for each artery. These proposed IMT cut-off values may help to improve the diagnostic accuracy of US in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9459085 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94590852022-09-10 Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis López-Gloria, Katerine Castrejón, Isabel Nieto-González, Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Merlos, Pablo Serrano-Benavente, Belén González, Carlos Manuel Monteagudo Sáez, Indalecio González, Teresa Álvaro-Gracia, José María Molina-Collada, Juan Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal ultrasound (US) cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries intima media thickness (IMT) to discriminate between patients with and without giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Retrospective observational study including patients referred to an US fast-track clinic. All patients underwent bilateral US examination of the cranial and extracranial arteries including the IMT measurement. Clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months was considered the gold standard for diagnosis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to select the cut-off values on the basis of the best tradeoff values between sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were included, 47 (29.9%) with clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months. 41 (87.2%) of patients with GCA had positive US findings (61.7% had cranial and 44.7% extracranial involvement). The best threshold IMT values were 0.44 mm for the common temporal artery; 0.34 mm for the frontal branch; 0.36 mm for the parietal branch; 1.1 mm for the carotid artery and 1 mm for the subclavian and axillary arteries. The areas under the ROC curves were greater for axillary arteries 0.996 (95% CI 0.991–1), for parietal branch 0.991 (95% CI 0.980–1), for subclavian 0.990 (95% CI 0.979–1), for frontal branch 0.989 (95% CI 0.976–1), for common temporal artery 0.984 (95% CI 0.959–1) and for common carotid arteries 0.977 (95% CI 0.961–0.993). CONCLUSION: IMT cut-off values have been identified for each artery. These proposed IMT cut-off values may help to improve the diagnostic accuracy of US in clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9459085/ /pubmed/36091695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.981804 Text en Copyright © 2022 López-Gloria, Castrejón, Nieto-González, Rodríguez-Merlos, Serrano-Benavente, González, Monteagudo Sáez, González, Álvaro-Gracia and Molina-Collada. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine López-Gloria, Katerine Castrejón, Isabel Nieto-González, Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Merlos, Pablo Serrano-Benavente, Belén González, Carlos Manuel Monteagudo Sáez, Indalecio González, Teresa Álvaro-Gracia, José María Molina-Collada, Juan Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis |
title | Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis |
title_full | Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis |
title_short | Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis |
title_sort | ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459085/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.981804 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lopezgloriakaterine ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis AT castrejonisabel ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis AT nietogonzalezjuancarlos ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis AT rodriguezmerlospablo ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis AT serranobenaventebelen ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis AT gonzalezcarlosmanuel ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis AT monteagudosaezindalecio ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis AT gonzalezteresa ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis AT alvarograciajosemaria ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis AT molinacolladajuan ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis |