Cargando…

Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal ultrasound (US) cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries intima media thickness (IMT) to discriminate between patients with and without giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Retrospective observational study including patients referred to an US fast-tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: López-Gloria, Katerine, Castrejón, Isabel, Nieto-González, Juan Carlos, Rodríguez-Merlos, Pablo, Serrano-Benavente, Belén, González, Carlos Manuel, Monteagudo Sáez, Indalecio, González, Teresa, Álvaro-Gracia, José María, Molina-Collada, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.981804
_version_ 1784786425430933504
author López-Gloria, Katerine
Castrejón, Isabel
Nieto-González, Juan Carlos
Rodríguez-Merlos, Pablo
Serrano-Benavente, Belén
González, Carlos Manuel
Monteagudo Sáez, Indalecio
González, Teresa
Álvaro-Gracia, José María
Molina-Collada, Juan
author_facet López-Gloria, Katerine
Castrejón, Isabel
Nieto-González, Juan Carlos
Rodríguez-Merlos, Pablo
Serrano-Benavente, Belén
González, Carlos Manuel
Monteagudo Sáez, Indalecio
González, Teresa
Álvaro-Gracia, José María
Molina-Collada, Juan
author_sort López-Gloria, Katerine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal ultrasound (US) cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries intima media thickness (IMT) to discriminate between patients with and without giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Retrospective observational study including patients referred to an US fast-track clinic. All patients underwent bilateral US examination of the cranial and extracranial arteries including the IMT measurement. Clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months was considered the gold standard for diagnosis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to select the cut-off values on the basis of the best tradeoff values between sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were included, 47 (29.9%) with clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months. 41 (87.2%) of patients with GCA had positive US findings (61.7% had cranial and 44.7% extracranial involvement). The best threshold IMT values were 0.44 mm for the common temporal artery; 0.34 mm for the frontal branch; 0.36 mm for the parietal branch; 1.1 mm for the carotid artery and 1 mm for the subclavian and axillary arteries. The areas under the ROC curves were greater for axillary arteries 0.996 (95% CI 0.991–1), for parietal branch 0.991 (95% CI 0.980–1), for subclavian 0.990 (95% CI 0.979–1), for frontal branch 0.989 (95% CI 0.976–1), for common temporal artery 0.984 (95% CI 0.959–1) and for common carotid arteries 0.977 (95% CI 0.961–0.993). CONCLUSION: IMT cut-off values have been identified for each artery. These proposed IMT cut-off values may help to improve the diagnostic accuracy of US in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9459085
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94590852022-09-10 Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis López-Gloria, Katerine Castrejón, Isabel Nieto-González, Juan Carlos Rodríguez-Merlos, Pablo Serrano-Benavente, Belén González, Carlos Manuel Monteagudo Sáez, Indalecio González, Teresa Álvaro-Gracia, José María Molina-Collada, Juan Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal ultrasound (US) cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries intima media thickness (IMT) to discriminate between patients with and without giant cell arteritis (GCA). METHODS: Retrospective observational study including patients referred to an US fast-track clinic. All patients underwent bilateral US examination of the cranial and extracranial arteries including the IMT measurement. Clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months was considered the gold standard for diagnosis. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to select the cut-off values on the basis of the best tradeoff values between sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were included, 47 (29.9%) with clinical confirmation of GCA after 6 months. 41 (87.2%) of patients with GCA had positive US findings (61.7% had cranial and 44.7% extracranial involvement). The best threshold IMT values were 0.44 mm for the common temporal artery; 0.34 mm for the frontal branch; 0.36 mm for the parietal branch; 1.1 mm for the carotid artery and 1 mm for the subclavian and axillary arteries. The areas under the ROC curves were greater for axillary arteries 0.996 (95% CI 0.991–1), for parietal branch 0.991 (95% CI 0.980–1), for subclavian 0.990 (95% CI 0.979–1), for frontal branch 0.989 (95% CI 0.976–1), for common temporal artery 0.984 (95% CI 0.959–1) and for common carotid arteries 0.977 (95% CI 0.961–0.993). CONCLUSION: IMT cut-off values have been identified for each artery. These proposed IMT cut-off values may help to improve the diagnostic accuracy of US in clinical practice. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9459085/ /pubmed/36091695 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.981804 Text en Copyright © 2022 López-Gloria, Castrejón, Nieto-González, Rodríguez-Merlos, Serrano-Benavente, González, Monteagudo Sáez, González, Álvaro-Gracia and Molina-Collada. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
López-Gloria, Katerine
Castrejón, Isabel
Nieto-González, Juan Carlos
Rodríguez-Merlos, Pablo
Serrano-Benavente, Belén
González, Carlos Manuel
Monteagudo Sáez, Indalecio
González, Teresa
Álvaro-Gracia, José María
Molina-Collada, Juan
Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis
title Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis
title_full Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis
title_fullStr Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis
title_short Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis
title_sort ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459085/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36091695
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.981804
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezgloriakaterine ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis
AT castrejonisabel ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis
AT nietogonzalezjuancarlos ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis
AT rodriguezmerlospablo ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis
AT serranobenaventebelen ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis
AT gonzalezcarlosmanuel ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis
AT monteagudosaezindalecio ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis
AT gonzalezteresa ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis
AT alvarograciajosemaria ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis
AT molinacolladajuan ultrasoundintimamediathicknesscutoffvaluesforcranialandextracranialarteriesinpatientswithsuspectedgiantcellarteritis