Cargando…

Harmonisation of welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets used or bred for research

Background: Accurate assessment of the welfare of non-human primates (NHPs) used and bred for scientific purposes is essential for effective implementation of obligations to optimise their well-being, for validation of refinement techniques and novel welfare indicators, and for ensuring the highest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prescott, Mark J., Leach, Matthew C., Truelove, Melissa A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36111214
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109380.3
_version_ 1784786447352463360
author Prescott, Mark J.
Leach, Matthew C.
Truelove, Melissa A.
author_facet Prescott, Mark J.
Leach, Matthew C.
Truelove, Melissa A.
author_sort Prescott, Mark J.
collection PubMed
description Background: Accurate assessment of the welfare of non-human primates (NHPs) used and bred for scientific purposes is essential for effective implementation of obligations to optimise their well-being, for validation of refinement techniques and novel welfare indicators, and for ensuring the highest quality data is obtained from these animals. Despite the importance of welfare assessment in NHP research, there is little consensus on what should be measured. Greater harmonisation of welfare indicators between facilities would enable greater collaboration and data sharing to address welfare-related questions in the management and use of NHPs. Methods: A Delphi consultation was used to survey attendees of the 2019 NC3Rs Primate Welfare Meeting (73 respondents) to build consensus on which welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets are reliable, valid, and practicable, and how these can be measured. Results: Self-harm behaviour, social enrichment, cage dimensions, body weight, a health monitoring programme, appetite, staff training, and positive reinforcement training were considered valid, reliable, and practicable indicators for macaques (≥70% consensus) within a hypothetical scenario context involving 500 animals. Indicators ranked important for assessing marmoset welfare were body weight, NHP induced and environmentally induced injuries, cage furniture, huddled posture, mortality, blood in excreta, and physical enrichment. Participants working with macaques in infectious disease and breeding identified a greater range of indicators as valid and reliable than did those working in neuroscience and toxicology, where animal-based indicators were considered the most important. The findings for macaques were compared with a previous Delphi consultation, and the expert-defined consensus from the two surveys used to develop a prototype protocol for assessing macaque welfare in research settings. Conclusions: Together the Delphi results and proto-protocol enable those working with research NHPs to more effectively assess the welfare of the animals in their care and to collaborate to advance refinement of NHP management and use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9459172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94591722022-09-14 Harmonisation of welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets used or bred for research Prescott, Mark J. Leach, Matthew C. Truelove, Melissa A. F1000Res Research Article Background: Accurate assessment of the welfare of non-human primates (NHPs) used and bred for scientific purposes is essential for effective implementation of obligations to optimise their well-being, for validation of refinement techniques and novel welfare indicators, and for ensuring the highest quality data is obtained from these animals. Despite the importance of welfare assessment in NHP research, there is little consensus on what should be measured. Greater harmonisation of welfare indicators between facilities would enable greater collaboration and data sharing to address welfare-related questions in the management and use of NHPs. Methods: A Delphi consultation was used to survey attendees of the 2019 NC3Rs Primate Welfare Meeting (73 respondents) to build consensus on which welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets are reliable, valid, and practicable, and how these can be measured. Results: Self-harm behaviour, social enrichment, cage dimensions, body weight, a health monitoring programme, appetite, staff training, and positive reinforcement training were considered valid, reliable, and practicable indicators for macaques (≥70% consensus) within a hypothetical scenario context involving 500 animals. Indicators ranked important for assessing marmoset welfare were body weight, NHP induced and environmentally induced injuries, cage furniture, huddled posture, mortality, blood in excreta, and physical enrichment. Participants working with macaques in infectious disease and breeding identified a greater range of indicators as valid and reliable than did those working in neuroscience and toxicology, where animal-based indicators were considered the most important. The findings for macaques were compared with a previous Delphi consultation, and the expert-defined consensus from the two surveys used to develop a prototype protocol for assessing macaque welfare in research settings. Conclusions: Together the Delphi results and proto-protocol enable those working with research NHPs to more effectively assess the welfare of the animals in their care and to collaborate to advance refinement of NHP management and use. F1000 Research Limited 2023-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC9459172/ /pubmed/36111214 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109380.3 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Prescott MJ et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Prescott, Mark J.
Leach, Matthew C.
Truelove, Melissa A.
Harmonisation of welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets used or bred for research
title Harmonisation of welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets used or bred for research
title_full Harmonisation of welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets used or bred for research
title_fullStr Harmonisation of welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets used or bred for research
title_full_unstemmed Harmonisation of welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets used or bred for research
title_short Harmonisation of welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets used or bred for research
title_sort harmonisation of welfare indicators for macaques and marmosets used or bred for research
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36111214
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.109380.3
work_keys_str_mv AT prescottmarkj harmonisationofwelfareindicatorsformacaquesandmarmosetsusedorbredforresearch
AT leachmatthewc harmonisationofwelfareindicatorsformacaquesandmarmosetsusedorbredforresearch
AT truelovemelissaa harmonisationofwelfareindicatorsformacaquesandmarmosetsusedorbredforresearch