Modified McKeown vs. traditional McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy in improving short-term efficacy and the quality of life of esophageal cancers: a retrospective comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND: Traditional McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE-McKeown) with resection of the thoracic and abdominal branches of vagus nerve, the azygos vein and the bronchial artery, is notorious for high complications incidence and sharply decreased quality of life (QoL) postoperatively in esophageal cancer (EC). Recently, reports of preservation of azygos vein arch or the vagus nerve have shown the advantages of decreasing postoperative complication incidence. However, the modified MIE-McKeown with preservation of azygos vein arch, vagus nerve and the bronchial artery has never been investigated in EC. In the present study, we aimed to compare the short-term efficacy and postoperative QoL between modified MIE-McKeown and traditional MIE-McKeown. METHODS: A total of 218 eligible patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who met our inclusion criteria between October 2018 and January 2022 in our center were retrospectively enrolled and divided into modified MIE-McKeown group (N=48) and the control group with traditional MIE-McKeown (N=170) according to their surgical procedure. We compared the perioperative parameters (e.g., operation time and postoperative complications) between the two groups. The core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30) (version 3.0) and the EC-specific QoL assessment form (QLQ-OES18) were used to evaluate the QoL in the 2 groups at 1 and 3 months after operation. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between modified MIE-McKeown group and the control group. Compared with the control group, the modified MIE-McKeown group had significantly lower postoperative drainage volume (551.46±249.45 vs. 812.96±405.82; P<0.001) and a lower incidence of thoracic stomach syndrome (TSS; P=0.001). The bleeding loss in the modified MIE-McKeown group was lower than that in the control group (56.88±20.44 vs. 83.18±97.93; P=0.066), but not significantly. There were no significant differences observed in postoperative complications and other perioperative parameters between the two groups. The results of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 questionnaire revealed that the modified MIE-McKeown group was associated with better physical function, better global health status and milder symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and cough. CONCLUSIONS: The modified MIE-McKeown is a safe and efficient procedure and has the potential to improve postoperative health status of patients with EC.