Cargando…

Validity of the Polar H10 Sensor for Heart Rate Variability Analysis during Resting State and Incremental Exercise in Recreational Men and Women

Heart rate variability (HRV) is frequently applied in sport-specific settings. The rising use of freely accessible applications for its recording requires validation processes to ensure accurate data. It is the aim of this study to compare the HRV data obtained by the Polar H10 sensor chest strap de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schaffarczyk, Marcelle, Rogers, Bruce, Reer, Rüdiger, Gronwald, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22176536
_version_ 1784786593390788608
author Schaffarczyk, Marcelle
Rogers, Bruce
Reer, Rüdiger
Gronwald, Thomas
author_facet Schaffarczyk, Marcelle
Rogers, Bruce
Reer, Rüdiger
Gronwald, Thomas
author_sort Schaffarczyk, Marcelle
collection PubMed
description Heart rate variability (HRV) is frequently applied in sport-specific settings. The rising use of freely accessible applications for its recording requires validation processes to ensure accurate data. It is the aim of this study to compare the HRV data obtained by the Polar H10 sensor chest strap device and an electrocardiogram (ECG) with the focus on RR intervals and short-term scaling exponent alpha 1 of Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA a1) as non-linear metric of HRV analysis. A group of 25 participants performed an exhaustive cycling ramp with measurements of HRV with both recording systems. Average time between heartbeats (RR), heart rate (HR) and DFA a1 were recorded before (PRE), during, and after (POST) the exercise test. High correlations were found for the resting conditions (PRE: r = 0.95, r(c) = 0.95, ICC(3,1) = 0.95, POST: r = 0.86, r(c) = 0.84, ICC(3,1) = 0.85) and for the incremental exercise (r > 0.93, r(c) > 0.93, ICC(3,1) > 0.93). While PRE and POST comparisons revealed no differences, significant bias could be found during the exercise test for all variables (p < 0.001). For RR and HR, bias and limits of agreement (LoA) in the Bland–Altman analysis were minimal (RR: bias of 0.7 to 0.4 ms with LoA of 4.3 to −2.8 ms during low intensity and 1.3 to −0.5 ms during high intensity, HR: bias of −0.1 to −0.2 ms with LoA of 0.3 to −0.5 ms during low intensity and 0.4 to −0.7 ms during high intensity). DFA a1 showed wider bias and LoAs (bias of 0.9 to 8.6% with LoA of 11.6 to −9.9% during low intensity and 58.1 to −40.9% during high intensity). Linear HRV measurements derived from the Polar H10 chest strap device show strong agreement and small bias compared with ECG recordings and can be recommended for practitioners. However, with respect to DFA a1, values in the uncorrelated range and during higher exercise intensities tend to elicit higher bias and wider LoA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9459793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94597932022-09-10 Validity of the Polar H10 Sensor for Heart Rate Variability Analysis during Resting State and Incremental Exercise in Recreational Men and Women Schaffarczyk, Marcelle Rogers, Bruce Reer, Rüdiger Gronwald, Thomas Sensors (Basel) Article Heart rate variability (HRV) is frequently applied in sport-specific settings. The rising use of freely accessible applications for its recording requires validation processes to ensure accurate data. It is the aim of this study to compare the HRV data obtained by the Polar H10 sensor chest strap device and an electrocardiogram (ECG) with the focus on RR intervals and short-term scaling exponent alpha 1 of Detrended Fluctuation Analysis (DFA a1) as non-linear metric of HRV analysis. A group of 25 participants performed an exhaustive cycling ramp with measurements of HRV with both recording systems. Average time between heartbeats (RR), heart rate (HR) and DFA a1 were recorded before (PRE), during, and after (POST) the exercise test. High correlations were found for the resting conditions (PRE: r = 0.95, r(c) = 0.95, ICC(3,1) = 0.95, POST: r = 0.86, r(c) = 0.84, ICC(3,1) = 0.85) and for the incremental exercise (r > 0.93, r(c) > 0.93, ICC(3,1) > 0.93). While PRE and POST comparisons revealed no differences, significant bias could be found during the exercise test for all variables (p < 0.001). For RR and HR, bias and limits of agreement (LoA) in the Bland–Altman analysis were minimal (RR: bias of 0.7 to 0.4 ms with LoA of 4.3 to −2.8 ms during low intensity and 1.3 to −0.5 ms during high intensity, HR: bias of −0.1 to −0.2 ms with LoA of 0.3 to −0.5 ms during low intensity and 0.4 to −0.7 ms during high intensity). DFA a1 showed wider bias and LoAs (bias of 0.9 to 8.6% with LoA of 11.6 to −9.9% during low intensity and 58.1 to −40.9% during high intensity). Linear HRV measurements derived from the Polar H10 chest strap device show strong agreement and small bias compared with ECG recordings and can be recommended for practitioners. However, with respect to DFA a1, values in the uncorrelated range and during higher exercise intensities tend to elicit higher bias and wider LoA. MDPI 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9459793/ /pubmed/36081005 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22176536 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Schaffarczyk, Marcelle
Rogers, Bruce
Reer, Rüdiger
Gronwald, Thomas
Validity of the Polar H10 Sensor for Heart Rate Variability Analysis during Resting State and Incremental Exercise in Recreational Men and Women
title Validity of the Polar H10 Sensor for Heart Rate Variability Analysis during Resting State and Incremental Exercise in Recreational Men and Women
title_full Validity of the Polar H10 Sensor for Heart Rate Variability Analysis during Resting State and Incremental Exercise in Recreational Men and Women
title_fullStr Validity of the Polar H10 Sensor for Heart Rate Variability Analysis during Resting State and Incremental Exercise in Recreational Men and Women
title_full_unstemmed Validity of the Polar H10 Sensor for Heart Rate Variability Analysis during Resting State and Incremental Exercise in Recreational Men and Women
title_short Validity of the Polar H10 Sensor for Heart Rate Variability Analysis during Resting State and Incremental Exercise in Recreational Men and Women
title_sort validity of the polar h10 sensor for heart rate variability analysis during resting state and incremental exercise in recreational men and women
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36081005
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22176536
work_keys_str_mv AT schaffarczykmarcelle validityofthepolarh10sensorforheartratevariabilityanalysisduringrestingstateandincrementalexerciseinrecreationalmenandwomen
AT rogersbruce validityofthepolarh10sensorforheartratevariabilityanalysisduringrestingstateandincrementalexerciseinrecreationalmenandwomen
AT reerrudiger validityofthepolarh10sensorforheartratevariabilityanalysisduringrestingstateandincrementalexerciseinrecreationalmenandwomen
AT gronwaldthomas validityofthepolarh10sensorforheartratevariabilityanalysisduringrestingstateandincrementalexerciseinrecreationalmenandwomen