Cargando…

What morphological MRI features enable differentiation of low-grade from high-grade soft tissue sarcoma?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of morphological MRI features separately and in combination for distinguishing low- from high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analysed pre-treatment MRI examinations with T1, T2 with and without fat suppressio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boudabbous, Sana, Hamard, Marion, Saiji, Essia, Gorican, Karel, Poletti, Pierre-Alexandre, Becker, Minerva, Neroladaki, Angeliki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Institute of Radiology. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20210081
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To assess the diagnostic performance of morphological MRI features separately and in combination for distinguishing low- from high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We retrospectively analysed pre-treatment MRI examinations with T1, T2 with and without fat suppression (FS) and contrast-enhanced T1 obtained in 64 patients with STS categorized histologically as low (n = 21) versus high grade (n = 43). Two musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to histology evaluated MRI features. Diagnostic performance was calculated for each reader and for MRI features showing significant association with histology (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis was performed to develop a diagnostic model to identify high-grade STS. RESULTS: Among all evaluated MRI features, only six features had adequate interobserver reproducibility (kappa>0.5). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association with tumour grade for lesion heterogeneity on FS images, intratumoural enhancement≥51% of tumour volume and peritumoural enhancement for both readers (p < 0.05). For both readers, the presence of each of the three features yielded odds ratios for high grade versus low grade from 4.4 to 9.1 (p < 0.05). The sum of the positive features for each reader independent of reader expertise yielded areas under the curve (AUCs) > 0.8. The presence of ≥2 positive features indicated a high risk for high-grade sarcoma, whereas ≤1 positive feature indicated a low-to-moderate risk CONCLUSION: A diagnostic MRI score based on tumour heterogeneity, intratumoural and peritumoural enhancement enables identification of lesions that are likely to be high-grade as opposed to low-grade STS. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Tumour heterogeneity in Fat Suppression sequence, intratumoural and peritumoural enhancement is identified as signs of high-grade sarcoma.