Cargando…
Fuzzy Strategy Grey Wolf Optimizer for Complex Multimodal Optimization Problems
Traditional grey wolf optimizers (GWOs) have difficulty balancing convergence and diversity when used for multimodal optimization problems (MMOPs), resulting in low-quality solutions and slow convergence. To address these drawbacks of GWOs, a fuzzy strategy grey wolf optimizer (FSGWO) is proposed in...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36080878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22176420 |
_version_ | 1784786637695221760 |
---|---|
author | Qin, Hua Meng, Tuanxing Cao, Yuyi |
author_facet | Qin, Hua Meng, Tuanxing Cao, Yuyi |
author_sort | Qin, Hua |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traditional grey wolf optimizers (GWOs) have difficulty balancing convergence and diversity when used for multimodal optimization problems (MMOPs), resulting in low-quality solutions and slow convergence. To address these drawbacks of GWOs, a fuzzy strategy grey wolf optimizer (FSGWO) is proposed in this paper. Binary joint normal distribution is used as a fuzzy method to realize the adaptive adjustment of the control parameters of the FSGWO. Next, the fuzzy mutation operator and the fuzzy crossover operator are designed to generate new individuals based on the fuzzy control parameters. Moreover, a noninferior selection strategy is employed to update the grey wolf population, which makes the entire population available for estimating the location of the optimal solution. Finally, the FSGWO is verified on 30 test functions of IEEE CEC2014 and five engineering application problems. Comparing FSGWO with state-of-the-art competitive algorithms, the results show that FSGWO is superior. Specifically, for the 50D test functions of CEC2014, the average calculation accuracy of FSGWO is 33.63%, 46.45%, 62.94%, 64.99%, and 59.82% higher than those of the equilibrium optimizer algorithm, modified particle swarm optimization, original GWO, hybrid particle swarm optimization and GWO, and selective opposition-based GWO, respectively. For the 30D and 50D test functions of CEC2014, the results of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test show that FSGWO is better than the competitive algorithms. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9459977 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94599772022-09-10 Fuzzy Strategy Grey Wolf Optimizer for Complex Multimodal Optimization Problems Qin, Hua Meng, Tuanxing Cao, Yuyi Sensors (Basel) Article Traditional grey wolf optimizers (GWOs) have difficulty balancing convergence and diversity when used for multimodal optimization problems (MMOPs), resulting in low-quality solutions and slow convergence. To address these drawbacks of GWOs, a fuzzy strategy grey wolf optimizer (FSGWO) is proposed in this paper. Binary joint normal distribution is used as a fuzzy method to realize the adaptive adjustment of the control parameters of the FSGWO. Next, the fuzzy mutation operator and the fuzzy crossover operator are designed to generate new individuals based on the fuzzy control parameters. Moreover, a noninferior selection strategy is employed to update the grey wolf population, which makes the entire population available for estimating the location of the optimal solution. Finally, the FSGWO is verified on 30 test functions of IEEE CEC2014 and five engineering application problems. Comparing FSGWO with state-of-the-art competitive algorithms, the results show that FSGWO is superior. Specifically, for the 50D test functions of CEC2014, the average calculation accuracy of FSGWO is 33.63%, 46.45%, 62.94%, 64.99%, and 59.82% higher than those of the equilibrium optimizer algorithm, modified particle swarm optimization, original GWO, hybrid particle swarm optimization and GWO, and selective opposition-based GWO, respectively. For the 30D and 50D test functions of CEC2014, the results of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test show that FSGWO is better than the competitive algorithms. MDPI 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9459977/ /pubmed/36080878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22176420 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Qin, Hua Meng, Tuanxing Cao, Yuyi Fuzzy Strategy Grey Wolf Optimizer for Complex Multimodal Optimization Problems |
title | Fuzzy Strategy Grey Wolf Optimizer for Complex Multimodal Optimization Problems |
title_full | Fuzzy Strategy Grey Wolf Optimizer for Complex Multimodal Optimization Problems |
title_fullStr | Fuzzy Strategy Grey Wolf Optimizer for Complex Multimodal Optimization Problems |
title_full_unstemmed | Fuzzy Strategy Grey Wolf Optimizer for Complex Multimodal Optimization Problems |
title_short | Fuzzy Strategy Grey Wolf Optimizer for Complex Multimodal Optimization Problems |
title_sort | fuzzy strategy grey wolf optimizer for complex multimodal optimization problems |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9459977/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36080878 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s22176420 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qinhua fuzzystrategygreywolfoptimizerforcomplexmultimodaloptimizationproblems AT mengtuanxing fuzzystrategygreywolfoptimizerforcomplexmultimodaloptimizationproblems AT caoyuyi fuzzystrategygreywolfoptimizerforcomplexmultimodaloptimizationproblems |