Cargando…

Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the relationship between anatomical compression introduced via ultrasound probe pressure and maximum perineum dose in prostate radiotherapy patients using the Clarity transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) system. METHODS: 115 patient ultrasound and computed tomography...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Silva, Kalani, Brown, Amy, Edwards, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.003
_version_ 1784786777507102720
author De Silva, Kalani
Brown, Amy
Edwards, Christopher
author_facet De Silva, Kalani
Brown, Amy
Edwards, Christopher
author_sort De Silva, Kalani
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the relationship between anatomical compression introduced via ultrasound probe pressure and maximum perineum dose in prostate radiotherapy patients using the Clarity transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) system. METHODS: 115 patient ultrasound and computed tomography scans were retrospectively analysed. The probe to prostate apex distance (PPA), probe to inferior corpus spongiosum distance (PICS) and maximum perineum dose were calculated. Compression was represented by the PICS and the calculated corpus to prostate ratio (CPR). Demographics included treatment technique, image quality, body mass index (BMI) and age. Multiple linear regression analysis assessed the relationship between compression measures and perineum dose. RESULTS: The maximum dose to perineum ranged from 1.81 to 45.56 Gy, with a median of 5.87 Gy (Interquartile range (IQR) 3.17). The PICS distance and CPR recorded was 1.67 cm (IQR 0.63) and 0.51 (range 0.29–0.85) respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated both PICS and CPR were significant predictors of maximum dose to the perineum (p < 0.001). Patient-specific factors, including age, BMI, treatment technique and ultrasound image quality, were not factors that significantly impacted the maximum perineum dose. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant association between increased anatomical compression and perineal dose measurements. A PICS of 1.2 cm or greater is recommended, with compression reduced as much as possible without losing anatomical US definition. Future investigations would be beneficial to evaluate the optimal balance between ultrasound image quality and transducer compression considering the perineum dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9460562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94605622022-09-10 Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy De Silva, Kalani Brown, Amy Edwards, Christopher Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Research article INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the relationship between anatomical compression introduced via ultrasound probe pressure and maximum perineum dose in prostate radiotherapy patients using the Clarity transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) system. METHODS: 115 patient ultrasound and computed tomography scans were retrospectively analysed. The probe to prostate apex distance (PPA), probe to inferior corpus spongiosum distance (PICS) and maximum perineum dose were calculated. Compression was represented by the PICS and the calculated corpus to prostate ratio (CPR). Demographics included treatment technique, image quality, body mass index (BMI) and age. Multiple linear regression analysis assessed the relationship between compression measures and perineum dose. RESULTS: The maximum dose to perineum ranged from 1.81 to 45.56 Gy, with a median of 5.87 Gy (Interquartile range (IQR) 3.17). The PICS distance and CPR recorded was 1.67 cm (IQR 0.63) and 0.51 (range 0.29–0.85) respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated both PICS and CPR were significant predictors of maximum dose to the perineum (p < 0.001). Patient-specific factors, including age, BMI, treatment technique and ultrasound image quality, were not factors that significantly impacted the maximum perineum dose. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant association between increased anatomical compression and perineal dose measurements. A PICS of 1.2 cm or greater is recommended, with compression reduced as much as possible without losing anatomical US definition. Future investigations would be beneficial to evaluate the optimal balance between ultrasound image quality and transducer compression considering the perineum dose. Elsevier 2022-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9460562/ /pubmed/36090010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.003 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research article
De Silva, Kalani
Brown, Amy
Edwards, Christopher
Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy
title Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy
title_full Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy
title_fullStr Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy
title_full_unstemmed Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy
title_short Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy
title_sort impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy
topic Research article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.003
work_keys_str_mv AT desilvakalani impactoftransperinealultrasoundonperinealskindoseinprostateradiationtherapy
AT brownamy impactoftransperinealultrasoundonperinealskindoseinprostateradiationtherapy
AT edwardschristopher impactoftransperinealultrasoundonperinealskindoseinprostateradiationtherapy