Cargando…
Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy
INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the relationship between anatomical compression introduced via ultrasound probe pressure and maximum perineum dose in prostate radiotherapy patients using the Clarity transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) system. METHODS: 115 patient ultrasound and computed tomography...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.003 |
_version_ | 1784786777507102720 |
---|---|
author | De Silva, Kalani Brown, Amy Edwards, Christopher |
author_facet | De Silva, Kalani Brown, Amy Edwards, Christopher |
author_sort | De Silva, Kalani |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the relationship between anatomical compression introduced via ultrasound probe pressure and maximum perineum dose in prostate radiotherapy patients using the Clarity transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) system. METHODS: 115 patient ultrasound and computed tomography scans were retrospectively analysed. The probe to prostate apex distance (PPA), probe to inferior corpus spongiosum distance (PICS) and maximum perineum dose were calculated. Compression was represented by the PICS and the calculated corpus to prostate ratio (CPR). Demographics included treatment technique, image quality, body mass index (BMI) and age. Multiple linear regression analysis assessed the relationship between compression measures and perineum dose. RESULTS: The maximum dose to perineum ranged from 1.81 to 45.56 Gy, with a median of 5.87 Gy (Interquartile range (IQR) 3.17). The PICS distance and CPR recorded was 1.67 cm (IQR 0.63) and 0.51 (range 0.29–0.85) respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated both PICS and CPR were significant predictors of maximum dose to the perineum (p < 0.001). Patient-specific factors, including age, BMI, treatment technique and ultrasound image quality, were not factors that significantly impacted the maximum perineum dose. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant association between increased anatomical compression and perineal dose measurements. A PICS of 1.2 cm or greater is recommended, with compression reduced as much as possible without losing anatomical US definition. Future investigations would be beneficial to evaluate the optimal balance between ultrasound image quality and transducer compression considering the perineum dose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9460562 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94605622022-09-10 Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy De Silva, Kalani Brown, Amy Edwards, Christopher Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol Research article INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the relationship between anatomical compression introduced via ultrasound probe pressure and maximum perineum dose in prostate radiotherapy patients using the Clarity transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) system. METHODS: 115 patient ultrasound and computed tomography scans were retrospectively analysed. The probe to prostate apex distance (PPA), probe to inferior corpus spongiosum distance (PICS) and maximum perineum dose were calculated. Compression was represented by the PICS and the calculated corpus to prostate ratio (CPR). Demographics included treatment technique, image quality, body mass index (BMI) and age. Multiple linear regression analysis assessed the relationship between compression measures and perineum dose. RESULTS: The maximum dose to perineum ranged from 1.81 to 45.56 Gy, with a median of 5.87 Gy (Interquartile range (IQR) 3.17). The PICS distance and CPR recorded was 1.67 cm (IQR 0.63) and 0.51 (range 0.29–0.85) respectively. Regression analysis demonstrated both PICS and CPR were significant predictors of maximum dose to the perineum (p < 0.001). Patient-specific factors, including age, BMI, treatment technique and ultrasound image quality, were not factors that significantly impacted the maximum perineum dose. CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant association between increased anatomical compression and perineal dose measurements. A PICS of 1.2 cm or greater is recommended, with compression reduced as much as possible without losing anatomical US definition. Future investigations would be beneficial to evaluate the optimal balance between ultrasound image quality and transducer compression considering the perineum dose. Elsevier 2022-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9460562/ /pubmed/36090010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.003 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research article De Silva, Kalani Brown, Amy Edwards, Christopher Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy |
title | Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy |
title_full | Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy |
title_fullStr | Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy |
title_short | Impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy |
title_sort | impact of transperineal ultrasound on perineal skin dose in prostate radiation therapy |
topic | Research article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460562/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT desilvakalani impactoftransperinealultrasoundonperinealskindoseinprostateradiationtherapy AT brownamy impactoftransperinealultrasoundonperinealskindoseinprostateradiationtherapy AT edwardschristopher impactoftransperinealultrasoundonperinealskindoseinprostateradiationtherapy |