Cargando…

Comparative Study on Thermal Response Mechanism of Two Binders during Slow Cook-Off

The HTPE (hydroxyl-terminated polyether) propellant had a lower ignition temperature (150 °C vs. 240 °C) than the HTPB (hydroxy-terminated polybutadiene) propellant in the slow cook-off test. The reactions of the two propellants were combustion and explosion, respectively. A series of experiments in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Xinzhou, Li, Jun, Ren, Hui, Jiao, Qingjie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36080774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14173699
_version_ 1784786847497453568
author Wu, Xinzhou
Li, Jun
Ren, Hui
Jiao, Qingjie
author_facet Wu, Xinzhou
Li, Jun
Ren, Hui
Jiao, Qingjie
author_sort Wu, Xinzhou
collection PubMed
description The HTPE (hydroxyl-terminated polyether) propellant had a lower ignition temperature (150 °C vs. 240 °C) than the HTPB (hydroxy-terminated polybutadiene) propellant in the slow cook-off test. The reactions of the two propellants were combustion and explosion, respectively. A series of experiments including the changes of colors and the intensity of infrared characteristic peaks were designed to characterize the differences in the thermal response mechanisms of the HTPB and HTPE binder systems. As a solid phase filler to accidental ignition, the weight loss and microscopic morphology of AP (30~230 °C) were observed by TG and SEM. The defects of the propellant caused by the cook-off were quantitatively analyzed by the box counting method. Above 120 °C, the HTPE propellant began to melt and disperse in the holes, filling the cracks, which generated during the decomposition of AP at a low temperature. Melting products were called the “high-temperature self-repair body”. A series of analyses proved that the different thermal responses of the two binders were the main cause of the slow cook-off results, which were likewise verified in the propellant mechanical properties and gel fraction test. From the microscopic point of view, the mechanism of HTPE’s slow cook-off performance superior to HTPB was revealed in this article.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9460848
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94608482022-09-10 Comparative Study on Thermal Response Mechanism of Two Binders during Slow Cook-Off Wu, Xinzhou Li, Jun Ren, Hui Jiao, Qingjie Polymers (Basel) Article The HTPE (hydroxyl-terminated polyether) propellant had a lower ignition temperature (150 °C vs. 240 °C) than the HTPB (hydroxy-terminated polybutadiene) propellant in the slow cook-off test. The reactions of the two propellants were combustion and explosion, respectively. A series of experiments including the changes of colors and the intensity of infrared characteristic peaks were designed to characterize the differences in the thermal response mechanisms of the HTPB and HTPE binder systems. As a solid phase filler to accidental ignition, the weight loss and microscopic morphology of AP (30~230 °C) were observed by TG and SEM. The defects of the propellant caused by the cook-off were quantitatively analyzed by the box counting method. Above 120 °C, the HTPE propellant began to melt and disperse in the holes, filling the cracks, which generated during the decomposition of AP at a low temperature. Melting products were called the “high-temperature self-repair body”. A series of analyses proved that the different thermal responses of the two binders were the main cause of the slow cook-off results, which were likewise verified in the propellant mechanical properties and gel fraction test. From the microscopic point of view, the mechanism of HTPE’s slow cook-off performance superior to HTPB was revealed in this article. MDPI 2022-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9460848/ /pubmed/36080774 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14173699 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wu, Xinzhou
Li, Jun
Ren, Hui
Jiao, Qingjie
Comparative Study on Thermal Response Mechanism of Two Binders during Slow Cook-Off
title Comparative Study on Thermal Response Mechanism of Two Binders during Slow Cook-Off
title_full Comparative Study on Thermal Response Mechanism of Two Binders during Slow Cook-Off
title_fullStr Comparative Study on Thermal Response Mechanism of Two Binders during Slow Cook-Off
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study on Thermal Response Mechanism of Two Binders during Slow Cook-Off
title_short Comparative Study on Thermal Response Mechanism of Two Binders during Slow Cook-Off
title_sort comparative study on thermal response mechanism of two binders during slow cook-off
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460848/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36080774
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym14173699
work_keys_str_mv AT wuxinzhou comparativestudyonthermalresponsemechanismoftwobindersduringslowcookoff
AT lijun comparativestudyonthermalresponsemechanismoftwobindersduringslowcookoff
AT renhui comparativestudyonthermalresponsemechanismoftwobindersduringslowcookoff
AT jiaoqingjie comparativestudyonthermalresponsemechanismoftwobindersduringslowcookoff