Cargando…

A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)

The genus Viola (Violaceae) is among the 40–50 largest genera among angiosperms, yet its taxonomy has not been revised for nearly a century. In the most recent revision, by Wilhelm Becker in 1925, the then-known 400 species were distributed among 14 sections and numerous unranked groups. Here, we pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marcussen, Thomas, Ballard, Harvey E., Danihelka, Jiří, Flores, Ana R., Nicola, Marcela V., Watson, John M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36079606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11172224
_version_ 1784786857742041088
author Marcussen, Thomas
Ballard, Harvey E.
Danihelka, Jiří
Flores, Ana R.
Nicola, Marcela V.
Watson, John M.
author_facet Marcussen, Thomas
Ballard, Harvey E.
Danihelka, Jiří
Flores, Ana R.
Nicola, Marcela V.
Watson, John M.
author_sort Marcussen, Thomas
collection PubMed
description The genus Viola (Violaceae) is among the 40–50 largest genera among angiosperms, yet its taxonomy has not been revised for nearly a century. In the most recent revision, by Wilhelm Becker in 1925, the then-known 400 species were distributed among 14 sections and numerous unranked groups. Here, we provide an updated, comprehensive classification of the genus, based on data from phylogeny, morphology, chromosome counts, and ploidy, and based on modern principles of monophyly. The revision is presented as an annotated global checklist of accepted species of Viola, an updated multigene phylogenetic network and an ITS phylogeny with denser taxon sampling, a brief summary of the taxonomic changes from Becker’s classification and their justification, a morphological binary key to the accepted subgenera, sections and subsections, and an account of each infrageneric subdivision with justifications for delimitation and rank including a description, a list of apomorphies, molecular phylogenies where possible or relevant, a distribution map, and a list of included species. We distribute the 664 species accepted by us into 2 subgenera, 31 sections, and 20 subsections. We erect one new subgenus of Viola (subg. Neoandinium, a replacement name for the illegitimate subg. Andinium), six new sections (sect. Abyssinium, sect. Himalayum, sect. Melvio, sect. Nematocaulon, sect. Spathulidium, sect. Xanthidium), and seven new subsections (subsect. Australasiaticae, subsect. Bulbosae, subsect. Clausenianae, subsect. Cleistogamae, subsect. Dispares, subsect. Formosanae, subsect. Pseudorupestres). Evolution within the genus is discussed in light of biogeography, the fossil record, morphology, and particular traits. Viola is among very few temperate and widespread genera that originated in South America. The biggest identified knowledge gaps for Viola concern the South American taxa, for which basic knowledge from phylogeny, chromosome counts, and fossil data is virtually absent. Viola has also never been subject to comprehensive anatomical study. Studies into seed anatomy and morphology are required to understand the fossil record of the genus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9460890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94608902022-09-10 A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae) Marcussen, Thomas Ballard, Harvey E. Danihelka, Jiří Flores, Ana R. Nicola, Marcela V. Watson, John M. Plants (Basel) Review The genus Viola (Violaceae) is among the 40–50 largest genera among angiosperms, yet its taxonomy has not been revised for nearly a century. In the most recent revision, by Wilhelm Becker in 1925, the then-known 400 species were distributed among 14 sections and numerous unranked groups. Here, we provide an updated, comprehensive classification of the genus, based on data from phylogeny, morphology, chromosome counts, and ploidy, and based on modern principles of monophyly. The revision is presented as an annotated global checklist of accepted species of Viola, an updated multigene phylogenetic network and an ITS phylogeny with denser taxon sampling, a brief summary of the taxonomic changes from Becker’s classification and their justification, a morphological binary key to the accepted subgenera, sections and subsections, and an account of each infrageneric subdivision with justifications for delimitation and rank including a description, a list of apomorphies, molecular phylogenies where possible or relevant, a distribution map, and a list of included species. We distribute the 664 species accepted by us into 2 subgenera, 31 sections, and 20 subsections. We erect one new subgenus of Viola (subg. Neoandinium, a replacement name for the illegitimate subg. Andinium), six new sections (sect. Abyssinium, sect. Himalayum, sect. Melvio, sect. Nematocaulon, sect. Spathulidium, sect. Xanthidium), and seven new subsections (subsect. Australasiaticae, subsect. Bulbosae, subsect. Clausenianae, subsect. Cleistogamae, subsect. Dispares, subsect. Formosanae, subsect. Pseudorupestres). Evolution within the genus is discussed in light of biogeography, the fossil record, morphology, and particular traits. Viola is among very few temperate and widespread genera that originated in South America. The biggest identified knowledge gaps for Viola concern the South American taxa, for which basic knowledge from phylogeny, chromosome counts, and fossil data is virtually absent. Viola has also never been subject to comprehensive anatomical study. Studies into seed anatomy and morphology are required to understand the fossil record of the genus. MDPI 2022-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9460890/ /pubmed/36079606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11172224 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Marcussen, Thomas
Ballard, Harvey E.
Danihelka, Jiří
Flores, Ana R.
Nicola, Marcela V.
Watson, John M.
A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
title A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
title_full A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
title_fullStr A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
title_full_unstemmed A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
title_short A Revised Phylogenetic Classification for Viola (Violaceae)
title_sort revised phylogenetic classification for viola (violaceae)
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36079606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants11172224
work_keys_str_mv AT marcussenthomas arevisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae
AT ballardharveye arevisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae
AT danihelkajiri arevisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae
AT floresanar arevisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae
AT nicolamarcelav arevisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae
AT watsonjohnm arevisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae
AT marcussenthomas revisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae
AT ballardharveye revisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae
AT danihelkajiri revisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae
AT floresanar revisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae
AT nicolamarcelav revisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae
AT watsonjohnm revisedphylogeneticclassificationforviolaviolaceae