Cargando…

Infigratinib in Early-Line and Salvage Therapy for FGFR3-Altered Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

The optimal sequencing of systemic treatments for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) is unknown. We assessed the efficacy of infigratinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1 to 3 inhibitor, in 67 patients with FGFR3-altered mUC by line of therapy. Objective response rates were 31% (early-l...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyou, Yung, Rosenberg, Jonathan E., Hoffman-Censits, Jean, Quinn, David I., Petrylak, Daniel, Galsky, Matthew, Vaishampayan, Ulka, De Giorgi, Ugo, Gupta, Sumati, Burris, Howard, Rearden, Jessica, Li, Ai, Xu, Cindy, Andresen, Corina, Moran, Susan, Daneshmand, Siamak, Bajorin, Dean, Pal, Sumanta K., Grivas, Petros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9460895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34782263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2021.10.004
Descripción
Sumario:The optimal sequencing of systemic treatments for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) is unknown. We assessed the efficacy of infigratinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1 to 3 inhibitor, in 67 patients with FGFR3-altered mUC by line of therapy. Objective response rates were 31% (early-line setting) and 24% (≥2nd-line setting). Infigratinib has notable activity in mUC regardless of line of therapy. INTRODUCTION: To describe the efficacy of infigratinib, a potent, selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1–3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor, across lines of therapy (LOT) in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had mUC and prior platinum-based chemotherapy, unless contraindicated, and activating FGFR3 mutation/fusion. Patients received infigratinib 125 mg orally daily (3 weeks on/1 week off) in a single-arm, open-label study. Primary endpoint: investigator-assessed confirmed objective response rate (ORR). Disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), best overall response (BOR) that included unconfirmed responses, and overall survival (OS) were also assessed. Subgroup analysis of efficacy and safety outcomes by LOT was performed. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were enrolled; 13 (19.4%) received infigratinib as early-line therapy for mUC due to ineligibility to receive platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall, ORR was 25.4% (95% CI 15.5–37.5) and DCR was 64.2% (95% CI 51.5–75.5). ORR was 30.8% (95% CI 9.1–61.4) with early-line infigratinib and 24.1% (95% CI 13.5–37.6) for ≥2 LOT. DCR was 46.2% (95% CI 19.2–74.9) for early-line and 68.5% (95% CI 54.4–80.5) for ≥2 LOT. PFS and OS appeared similar in both groups. Thirteen of 59 patients with a bladder primary tumor received early-line treatment with an ORR of 30.5% (95% CI 9.1–61.4), and 46 received ≥2 LOT with an ORR of 20.3% (95% CI 9.4–33.9); BOR was 38.5% (95% CI: 13.9–68.4%) and 42.6% (95% CI: 29.2–56.8%) in the early-line and salvage settings, respectively. Eight patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma received salvage therapy (ORR, 50.0%; DCR, 100.0%). No significant differences in toxicities between LOT were observed. CONCLUSION: Infigratinib has notable activity in patients with mUC regardless of LOT. The findings support the evaluation of infigratinib across different settings in mUC.