Cargando…
Characterization of passive permeability after low intensity focused ultrasound mediated blood–brain barrier disruption in a preclinical model
BACKGROUND: Systemic drug delivery to the central nervous system is limited by presence of the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Low intensity focused ultrasound (LiFUS) is a non-invasive technique to disrupt the BBB, though there is a lack of understanding of the relationship between LiFUS parameters, suc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9461249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36076213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00369-1 |
_version_ | 1784786935423696896 |
---|---|
author | Arsiwala, Tasneem A. Sprowls, Samuel A. Blethen, Kathryn E. Fladeland, Ross A. Wolford, Cullen P. Kielkowski, Brooke N. Glass, Morgan J. Wang, Peng Wilson, Olivia Carpenter, Jeffrey S. Ranjan, Manish Finomore, Victor Rezai, Ali Lockman, Paul R. |
author_facet | Arsiwala, Tasneem A. Sprowls, Samuel A. Blethen, Kathryn E. Fladeland, Ross A. Wolford, Cullen P. Kielkowski, Brooke N. Glass, Morgan J. Wang, Peng Wilson, Olivia Carpenter, Jeffrey S. Ranjan, Manish Finomore, Victor Rezai, Ali Lockman, Paul R. |
author_sort | Arsiwala, Tasneem A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Systemic drug delivery to the central nervous system is limited by presence of the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Low intensity focused ultrasound (LiFUS) is a non-invasive technique to disrupt the BBB, though there is a lack of understanding of the relationship between LiFUS parameters, such as cavitation dose, time of sonication, microbubble dose, and the time course and magnitude of BBB disruption. Discrepancies in these data arise from experimentation with modified, clinically untranslatable transducers and inconsistent parameters for sonication. In this report, we characterize microbubble and cavitation doses as LiFUS variables as they pertain to the time course and size of BBB opening with a clinical Insightec FUS system. METHODS: Female Nu/Nu athymic mice were exposed to LiFUS using the ExAblate Neuro system (v7.4, Insightec, Haifa, Israel) following target verification with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Microbubble and cavitation doses ranged from 4–400 μL/kg, and 0.1–1.5 cavitation dose, respectively. The time course and magnitude of BBB opening was evaluated using fluorescent tracers, ranging in size from 105–10,000 Da, administered intravenously at different times pre- or post-LiFUS. Quantitative autoradiography and fluorescence microscopy were used to quantify tracer accumulation in brain. RESULTS: We observed a microbubble and cavitation dose dependent increase in tracer uptake within brain after LiFUS. Tracer accumulation was size dependent, with (14)C-AIB (100 Da) accumulating to a greater degree than larger markers (~ 625 Da–10 kDa). Our data suggest opening of the BBB via LiFUS is time dependent and biphasic. Accumulation of solutes was highest when administered prior to LiFUS mediated disruption (2–fivefold increases), but was also significantly elevated at 6 h post treatment for both (14)C-AIB and Texas Red. CONCLUSION: The magnitude of LiFUS mediated BBB opening correlates with concentration of microbubbles, cavitation dose as well as time of tracer administration post-sonication. These data help define the window of maximal BBB opening and applicable sonication parameters on a clinically translatable and commercially available FUS system that can be used to improve passive permeability and accumulation of therapeutics targeting the brain. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9461249 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94612492022-09-10 Characterization of passive permeability after low intensity focused ultrasound mediated blood–brain barrier disruption in a preclinical model Arsiwala, Tasneem A. Sprowls, Samuel A. Blethen, Kathryn E. Fladeland, Ross A. Wolford, Cullen P. Kielkowski, Brooke N. Glass, Morgan J. Wang, Peng Wilson, Olivia Carpenter, Jeffrey S. Ranjan, Manish Finomore, Victor Rezai, Ali Lockman, Paul R. Fluids Barriers CNS Research BACKGROUND: Systemic drug delivery to the central nervous system is limited by presence of the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Low intensity focused ultrasound (LiFUS) is a non-invasive technique to disrupt the BBB, though there is a lack of understanding of the relationship between LiFUS parameters, such as cavitation dose, time of sonication, microbubble dose, and the time course and magnitude of BBB disruption. Discrepancies in these data arise from experimentation with modified, clinically untranslatable transducers and inconsistent parameters for sonication. In this report, we characterize microbubble and cavitation doses as LiFUS variables as they pertain to the time course and size of BBB opening with a clinical Insightec FUS system. METHODS: Female Nu/Nu athymic mice were exposed to LiFUS using the ExAblate Neuro system (v7.4, Insightec, Haifa, Israel) following target verification with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Microbubble and cavitation doses ranged from 4–400 μL/kg, and 0.1–1.5 cavitation dose, respectively. The time course and magnitude of BBB opening was evaluated using fluorescent tracers, ranging in size from 105–10,000 Da, administered intravenously at different times pre- or post-LiFUS. Quantitative autoradiography and fluorescence microscopy were used to quantify tracer accumulation in brain. RESULTS: We observed a microbubble and cavitation dose dependent increase in tracer uptake within brain after LiFUS. Tracer accumulation was size dependent, with (14)C-AIB (100 Da) accumulating to a greater degree than larger markers (~ 625 Da–10 kDa). Our data suggest opening of the BBB via LiFUS is time dependent and biphasic. Accumulation of solutes was highest when administered prior to LiFUS mediated disruption (2–fivefold increases), but was also significantly elevated at 6 h post treatment for both (14)C-AIB and Texas Red. CONCLUSION: The magnitude of LiFUS mediated BBB opening correlates with concentration of microbubbles, cavitation dose as well as time of tracer administration post-sonication. These data help define the window of maximal BBB opening and applicable sonication parameters on a clinically translatable and commercially available FUS system that can be used to improve passive permeability and accumulation of therapeutics targeting the brain. BioMed Central 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9461249/ /pubmed/36076213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00369-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Arsiwala, Tasneem A. Sprowls, Samuel A. Blethen, Kathryn E. Fladeland, Ross A. Wolford, Cullen P. Kielkowski, Brooke N. Glass, Morgan J. Wang, Peng Wilson, Olivia Carpenter, Jeffrey S. Ranjan, Manish Finomore, Victor Rezai, Ali Lockman, Paul R. Characterization of passive permeability after low intensity focused ultrasound mediated blood–brain barrier disruption in a preclinical model |
title | Characterization of passive permeability after low intensity focused ultrasound mediated blood–brain barrier disruption in a preclinical model |
title_full | Characterization of passive permeability after low intensity focused ultrasound mediated blood–brain barrier disruption in a preclinical model |
title_fullStr | Characterization of passive permeability after low intensity focused ultrasound mediated blood–brain barrier disruption in a preclinical model |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterization of passive permeability after low intensity focused ultrasound mediated blood–brain barrier disruption in a preclinical model |
title_short | Characterization of passive permeability after low intensity focused ultrasound mediated blood–brain barrier disruption in a preclinical model |
title_sort | characterization of passive permeability after low intensity focused ultrasound mediated blood–brain barrier disruption in a preclinical model |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9461249/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36076213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12987-022-00369-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arsiwalatasneema characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT sprowlssamuela characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT blethenkathryne characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT fladelandrossa characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT wolfordcullenp characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT kielkowskibrooken characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT glassmorganj characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT wangpeng characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT wilsonolivia characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT carpenterjeffreys characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT ranjanmanish characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT finomorevictor characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT rezaiali characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel AT lockmanpaulr characterizationofpassivepermeabilityafterlowintensityfocusedultrasoundmediatedbloodbrainbarrierdisruptioninapreclinicalmodel |