Cargando…

Accounting for Context in Randomized Trials after Assignment

Many preventive trials randomize individuals to intervention condition which is then delivered in a group setting. Other trials randomize higher levels, say organizations, and then use learning collaboratives comprised of multiple organizations to support improved implementation or sustainment. Othe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, C. Hendricks, Hedeker, Donald, Gibbons, Robert D., Duan, Naihua, Almirall, Daniel, Gallo, Carlos, Burnett-Zeigler, Inger, Prado, Guillermo, Young, Sean D., Valido, Alberto, Wyman, Peter A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9461380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36083435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01426-9
_version_ 1784786959922626560
author Brown, C. Hendricks
Hedeker, Donald
Gibbons, Robert D.
Duan, Naihua
Almirall, Daniel
Gallo, Carlos
Burnett-Zeigler, Inger
Prado, Guillermo
Young, Sean D.
Valido, Alberto
Wyman, Peter A.
author_facet Brown, C. Hendricks
Hedeker, Donald
Gibbons, Robert D.
Duan, Naihua
Almirall, Daniel
Gallo, Carlos
Burnett-Zeigler, Inger
Prado, Guillermo
Young, Sean D.
Valido, Alberto
Wyman, Peter A.
author_sort Brown, C. Hendricks
collection PubMed
description Many preventive trials randomize individuals to intervention condition which is then delivered in a group setting. Other trials randomize higher levels, say organizations, and then use learning collaboratives comprised of multiple organizations to support improved implementation or sustainment. Other trials randomize or expand existing social networks and use key opinion leaders to deliver interventions through these networks. We use the term contextually driven to refer generally to such trials (traditionally referred to as clustering, where groups are formed either pre-randomization or post-randomization — i.e., a cluster-randomized trial), as these groupings or networks provide fixed or time-varying contexts that matter both theoretically and practically in the delivery of interventions. While such contextually driven trials can provide efficient and effective ways to deliver and evaluate prevention programs, they all require analytical procedures that take appropriate account of non-independence, something not always appreciated. Published analyses of many prevention trials have failed to take this into account. We discuss different types of contextually driven designs and then show that even small amounts of non-independence can inflate actual Type I error rates. This inflation leads to rejecting the null hypotheses too often, and erroneously leading us to conclude that there are significant differences between interventions when they do not exist. We describe a procedure to account for non-independence in the important case of a two-arm trial that randomizes units of individuals or organizations in both arms and then provides the active treatment in one arm through groups formed after assignment. We provide sample code in multiple programming languages to guide the analyst, distinguish diverse contextually driven designs, and summarize implications for multiple audiences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11121-022-01426-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9461380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94613802022-09-10 Accounting for Context in Randomized Trials after Assignment Brown, C. Hendricks Hedeker, Donald Gibbons, Robert D. Duan, Naihua Almirall, Daniel Gallo, Carlos Burnett-Zeigler, Inger Prado, Guillermo Young, Sean D. Valido, Alberto Wyman, Peter A. Prev Sci Article Many preventive trials randomize individuals to intervention condition which is then delivered in a group setting. Other trials randomize higher levels, say organizations, and then use learning collaboratives comprised of multiple organizations to support improved implementation or sustainment. Other trials randomize or expand existing social networks and use key opinion leaders to deliver interventions through these networks. We use the term contextually driven to refer generally to such trials (traditionally referred to as clustering, where groups are formed either pre-randomization or post-randomization — i.e., a cluster-randomized trial), as these groupings or networks provide fixed or time-varying contexts that matter both theoretically and practically in the delivery of interventions. While such contextually driven trials can provide efficient and effective ways to deliver and evaluate prevention programs, they all require analytical procedures that take appropriate account of non-independence, something not always appreciated. Published analyses of many prevention trials have failed to take this into account. We discuss different types of contextually driven designs and then show that even small amounts of non-independence can inflate actual Type I error rates. This inflation leads to rejecting the null hypotheses too often, and erroneously leading us to conclude that there are significant differences between interventions when they do not exist. We describe a procedure to account for non-independence in the important case of a two-arm trial that randomizes units of individuals or organizations in both arms and then provides the active treatment in one arm through groups formed after assignment. We provide sample code in multiple programming languages to guide the analyst, distinguish diverse contextually driven designs, and summarize implications for multiple audiences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11121-022-01426-9. Springer US 2022-09-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9461380/ /pubmed/36083435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01426-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Brown, C. Hendricks
Hedeker, Donald
Gibbons, Robert D.
Duan, Naihua
Almirall, Daniel
Gallo, Carlos
Burnett-Zeigler, Inger
Prado, Guillermo
Young, Sean D.
Valido, Alberto
Wyman, Peter A.
Accounting for Context in Randomized Trials after Assignment
title Accounting for Context in Randomized Trials after Assignment
title_full Accounting for Context in Randomized Trials after Assignment
title_fullStr Accounting for Context in Randomized Trials after Assignment
title_full_unstemmed Accounting for Context in Randomized Trials after Assignment
title_short Accounting for Context in Randomized Trials after Assignment
title_sort accounting for context in randomized trials after assignment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9461380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36083435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-022-01426-9
work_keys_str_mv AT brownchendricks accountingforcontextinrandomizedtrialsafterassignment
AT hedekerdonald accountingforcontextinrandomizedtrialsafterassignment
AT gibbonsrobertd accountingforcontextinrandomizedtrialsafterassignment
AT duannaihua accountingforcontextinrandomizedtrialsafterassignment
AT almiralldaniel accountingforcontextinrandomizedtrialsafterassignment
AT gallocarlos accountingforcontextinrandomizedtrialsafterassignment
AT burnettzeigleringer accountingforcontextinrandomizedtrialsafterassignment
AT pradoguillermo accountingforcontextinrandomizedtrialsafterassignment
AT youngseand accountingforcontextinrandomizedtrialsafterassignment
AT validoalberto accountingforcontextinrandomizedtrialsafterassignment
AT wymanpetera accountingforcontextinrandomizedtrialsafterassignment