Cargando…

Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics of human tissues

Analyses of metabolic compounds inside cells or tissues provide high information content since they represent the endpoint of biological information flow and are a snapshot of the integration of many regulatory processes. However, quantification of the abundance of metabolites requires their careful...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andresen, Carolin, Boch, Tobias, Gegner, Hagen M., Mechtel, Nils, Narr, Andreas, Birgin, Emrullah, Rasbach, Erik, Rahbari, Nuh, Trumpp, Andreas, Poschet, Gernot, Hübschmann, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9461704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.932261
_version_ 1784787016002568192
author Andresen, Carolin
Boch, Tobias
Gegner, Hagen M.
Mechtel, Nils
Narr, Andreas
Birgin, Emrullah
Rasbach, Erik
Rahbari, Nuh
Trumpp, Andreas
Poschet, Gernot
Hübschmann, Daniel
author_facet Andresen, Carolin
Boch, Tobias
Gegner, Hagen M.
Mechtel, Nils
Narr, Andreas
Birgin, Emrullah
Rasbach, Erik
Rahbari, Nuh
Trumpp, Andreas
Poschet, Gernot
Hübschmann, Daniel
author_sort Andresen, Carolin
collection PubMed
description Analyses of metabolic compounds inside cells or tissues provide high information content since they represent the endpoint of biological information flow and are a snapshot of the integration of many regulatory processes. However, quantification of the abundance of metabolites requires their careful extraction. We present a comprehensive study comparing ten extraction protocols in four human sample types (liver tissue, bone marrow, HL60, and HEK cells) aiming to detect and quantify up to 630 metabolites of different chemical classes. We show that the extraction efficiency and repeatability are highly variable across protocols, tissues, and chemical classes of metabolites. We used different quality metrics including the limit of detection and variability between replicates as well as the sum of concentrations as a global estimate of analytical repeatability of the extraction. The coverage of extracted metabolites depends on the used solvents, which has implications for the design of measurements of different sample types and metabolic compounds of interest. The benchmark dataset can be explored in an easy-to-use, interactive, and flexible online resource (R/shiny app MetaboExtract: http://www.metaboextract.shiny.dkfz.de) for context-specific selection of the optimal extraction method. Furthermore, data processing and conversion functionality underlying the shiny app are accessible as an R package: https://cran.r-project.org/package=MetAlyzer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9461704
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94617042022-09-10 Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics of human tissues Andresen, Carolin Boch, Tobias Gegner, Hagen M. Mechtel, Nils Narr, Andreas Birgin, Emrullah Rasbach, Erik Rahbari, Nuh Trumpp, Andreas Poschet, Gernot Hübschmann, Daniel Front Mol Biosci Molecular Biosciences Analyses of metabolic compounds inside cells or tissues provide high information content since they represent the endpoint of biological information flow and are a snapshot of the integration of many regulatory processes. However, quantification of the abundance of metabolites requires their careful extraction. We present a comprehensive study comparing ten extraction protocols in four human sample types (liver tissue, bone marrow, HL60, and HEK cells) aiming to detect and quantify up to 630 metabolites of different chemical classes. We show that the extraction efficiency and repeatability are highly variable across protocols, tissues, and chemical classes of metabolites. We used different quality metrics including the limit of detection and variability between replicates as well as the sum of concentrations as a global estimate of analytical repeatability of the extraction. The coverage of extracted metabolites depends on the used solvents, which has implications for the design of measurements of different sample types and metabolic compounds of interest. The benchmark dataset can be explored in an easy-to-use, interactive, and flexible online resource (R/shiny app MetaboExtract: http://www.metaboextract.shiny.dkfz.de) for context-specific selection of the optimal extraction method. Furthermore, data processing and conversion functionality underlying the shiny app are accessible as an R package: https://cran.r-project.org/package=MetAlyzer. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9461704/ /pubmed/36090025 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.932261 Text en Copyright © 2022 Andresen, Boch, Gegner, Mechtel, Narr, Birgin, Rasbach, Rahbari, Trumpp, Poschet and Hübschmann. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Molecular Biosciences
Andresen, Carolin
Boch, Tobias
Gegner, Hagen M.
Mechtel, Nils
Narr, Andreas
Birgin, Emrullah
Rasbach, Erik
Rahbari, Nuh
Trumpp, Andreas
Poschet, Gernot
Hübschmann, Daniel
Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics of human tissues
title Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics of human tissues
title_full Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics of human tissues
title_fullStr Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics of human tissues
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics of human tissues
title_short Comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics of human tissues
title_sort comparison of extraction methods for intracellular metabolomics of human tissues
topic Molecular Biosciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9461704/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36090025
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.932261
work_keys_str_mv AT andresencarolin comparisonofextractionmethodsforintracellularmetabolomicsofhumantissues
AT bochtobias comparisonofextractionmethodsforintracellularmetabolomicsofhumantissues
AT gegnerhagenm comparisonofextractionmethodsforintracellularmetabolomicsofhumantissues
AT mechtelnils comparisonofextractionmethodsforintracellularmetabolomicsofhumantissues
AT narrandreas comparisonofextractionmethodsforintracellularmetabolomicsofhumantissues
AT birginemrullah comparisonofextractionmethodsforintracellularmetabolomicsofhumantissues
AT rasbacherik comparisonofextractionmethodsforintracellularmetabolomicsofhumantissues
AT rahbarinuh comparisonofextractionmethodsforintracellularmetabolomicsofhumantissues
AT trumppandreas comparisonofextractionmethodsforintracellularmetabolomicsofhumantissues
AT poschetgernot comparisonofextractionmethodsforintracellularmetabolomicsofhumantissues
AT hubschmanndaniel comparisonofextractionmethodsforintracellularmetabolomicsofhumantissues