Cargando…

Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study

OBJECTIVES: To increase postmortem organ donation rates, several countries are adopting an opt-out (presumed consent) policy, meaning that individuals are deemed donors unless they expressly refused so. Although opt-out countries tend to have higher donation rates, there is no conclusive evidence th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Molina-Pérez, Alberto, Rodríguez-Arias, David, Delgado, Janet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9462118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36441113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057107
_version_ 1784787108210147328
author Molina-Pérez, Alberto
Rodríguez-Arias, David
Delgado, Janet
author_facet Molina-Pérez, Alberto
Rodríguez-Arias, David
Delgado, Janet
author_sort Molina-Pérez, Alberto
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To increase postmortem organ donation rates, several countries are adopting an opt-out (presumed consent) policy, meaning that individuals are deemed donors unless they expressly refused so. Although opt-out countries tend to have higher donation rates, there is no conclusive evidence that this is caused by the policy itself. The main objective of this study is to better assess the direct impact of consent policy defaults per se on deceased organ recovery rates when considering the role of the family in the decision-making process. This study does not take into account any indirect effects of defaults, such as potential psychological and behavioural effects on individuals and their relatives. DESIGN: Based on previous work regarding consent policies, we created a conceptual model of the decision-making process for deceased organ recovery that included any scenario that could be directly influenced by opt-in or opt-out policies. We then applied this model to internationally published data of the consent process to determine how frequently policy defaults could apply. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measure the direct impact that opt-in and opt-out policies have per se on deceased organ recovery. RESULTS: Our analysis shows that opt-in and opt-out have strictly identical outcomes in eight out of nine situations. They only differ when neither the deceased nor the family have expressed a preference and defaults therefore apply. The direct impact of consent policy defaults is typically circumscribed to a range of 0%–5% of all opportunities for organ recovery. Our study also shows that the intervention of the family improves organ retrieval under opt-in but hinders it under opt-out. CONCLUSIONS: This study may warn policy makers that, by emphasising the need to introduce presumed consent to increase organ recovery rates, they might be overestimating the influence of the default and underestimating the power granted to families.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9462118
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94621182022-09-14 Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study Molina-Pérez, Alberto Rodríguez-Arias, David Delgado, Janet BMJ Open Health Policy OBJECTIVES: To increase postmortem organ donation rates, several countries are adopting an opt-out (presumed consent) policy, meaning that individuals are deemed donors unless they expressly refused so. Although opt-out countries tend to have higher donation rates, there is no conclusive evidence that this is caused by the policy itself. The main objective of this study is to better assess the direct impact of consent policy defaults per se on deceased organ recovery rates when considering the role of the family in the decision-making process. This study does not take into account any indirect effects of defaults, such as potential psychological and behavioural effects on individuals and their relatives. DESIGN: Based on previous work regarding consent policies, we created a conceptual model of the decision-making process for deceased organ recovery that included any scenario that could be directly influenced by opt-in or opt-out policies. We then applied this model to internationally published data of the consent process to determine how frequently policy defaults could apply. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measure the direct impact that opt-in and opt-out policies have per se on deceased organ recovery. RESULTS: Our analysis shows that opt-in and opt-out have strictly identical outcomes in eight out of nine situations. They only differ when neither the deceased nor the family have expressed a preference and defaults therefore apply. The direct impact of consent policy defaults is typically circumscribed to a range of 0%–5% of all opportunities for organ recovery. Our study also shows that the intervention of the family improves organ retrieval under opt-in but hinders it under opt-out. CONCLUSIONS: This study may warn policy makers that, by emphasising the need to introduce presumed consent to increase organ recovery rates, they might be overestimating the influence of the default and underestimating the power granted to families. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9462118/ /pubmed/36441113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057107 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Policy
Molina-Pérez, Alberto
Rodríguez-Arias, David
Delgado, Janet
Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study
title Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study
title_full Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study
title_fullStr Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study
title_full_unstemmed Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study
title_short Differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study
title_sort differential impact of opt-in, opt-out policies on deceased organ donation rates: a mixed conceptual and empirical study
topic Health Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9462118/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36441113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057107
work_keys_str_mv AT molinaperezalberto differentialimpactofoptinoptoutpoliciesondeceasedorgandonationratesamixedconceptualandempiricalstudy
AT rodriguezariasdavid differentialimpactofoptinoptoutpoliciesondeceasedorgandonationratesamixedconceptualandempiricalstudy
AT delgadojanet differentialimpactofoptinoptoutpoliciesondeceasedorgandonationratesamixedconceptualandempiricalstudy