Cargando…
Research in eating disorders: the misunderstanding of supposing serious mental illnesses as a niche specialty
PURPOSE: Eating disorders (EDs) are mental illnesses with severe consequences and high mortality rates. Notwithstanding, EDs are considered a niche specialty making it often difficult for researchers to publish in high-impact journals. Subsequently, research on EDs receives less funding than other f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9462607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36085407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-022-01473-9 |
_version_ | 1784787223545118720 |
---|---|
author | Marzola, Enrica Panero, Matteo Longo, Paola Martini, Matteo Fernàndez-Aranda, Fernando Kaye, Walter H. Abbate-Daga, Giovanni |
author_facet | Marzola, Enrica Panero, Matteo Longo, Paola Martini, Matteo Fernàndez-Aranda, Fernando Kaye, Walter H. Abbate-Daga, Giovanni |
author_sort | Marzola, Enrica |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Eating disorders (EDs) are mental illnesses with severe consequences and high mortality rates. Notwithstanding, EDs are considered a niche specialty making it often difficult for researchers to publish in high-impact journals. Subsequently, research on EDs receives less funding than other fields of psychiatry potentially slowing treatment progress. This study aimed to compare research vitality between EDs and schizophrenia focusing on: number and type of publications; top-cited articles; geographical distribution of top-ten publishing countries; journal distribution of scientific production as measured by bibliometric analysis; funded research and collaborations. METHODS: We used the Scopus database, then we adopted the Bibliometrix R-package software with the web interface app Biblioshiny. We included in the analyses 1,916 papers on EDs and 6491 on schizophrenia. RESULTS: The ED field published three times less than schizophrenia in top-ranking journals – with letters and notes particularly lacking—notwithstanding a comparable number of papers published per author. Only 50% of top-cited articles focused on EDs and a smaller pool of journals available for ED research (i.e., Zones 1 and 2 according to Bradford's law) emerged; journals publishing on EDs showed an overall lower rank compared to the schizophrenia field. Schizophrenia research was more geographically distributed and more funded; in contrast, a comparable collaboration index was found between the fields. CONCLUSION: These data show that research on EDs is currently marginalized and top-rank journals are seldom achievable by researchers in EDs. Such difficulties in research dissemination entail potentially serious repercussions on clinical advancements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V: opinions of respected authorities, based on descriptive studies, narrative reviews, clinical experience, or reports of expert committees. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40519-022-01473-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9462607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94626072022-09-10 Research in eating disorders: the misunderstanding of supposing serious mental illnesses as a niche specialty Marzola, Enrica Panero, Matteo Longo, Paola Martini, Matteo Fernàndez-Aranda, Fernando Kaye, Walter H. Abbate-Daga, Giovanni Eat Weight Disord Review PURPOSE: Eating disorders (EDs) are mental illnesses with severe consequences and high mortality rates. Notwithstanding, EDs are considered a niche specialty making it often difficult for researchers to publish in high-impact journals. Subsequently, research on EDs receives less funding than other fields of psychiatry potentially slowing treatment progress. This study aimed to compare research vitality between EDs and schizophrenia focusing on: number and type of publications; top-cited articles; geographical distribution of top-ten publishing countries; journal distribution of scientific production as measured by bibliometric analysis; funded research and collaborations. METHODS: We used the Scopus database, then we adopted the Bibliometrix R-package software with the web interface app Biblioshiny. We included in the analyses 1,916 papers on EDs and 6491 on schizophrenia. RESULTS: The ED field published three times less than schizophrenia in top-ranking journals – with letters and notes particularly lacking—notwithstanding a comparable number of papers published per author. Only 50% of top-cited articles focused on EDs and a smaller pool of journals available for ED research (i.e., Zones 1 and 2 according to Bradford's law) emerged; journals publishing on EDs showed an overall lower rank compared to the schizophrenia field. Schizophrenia research was more geographically distributed and more funded; in contrast, a comparable collaboration index was found between the fields. CONCLUSION: These data show that research on EDs is currently marginalized and top-rank journals are seldom achievable by researchers in EDs. Such difficulties in research dissemination entail potentially serious repercussions on clinical advancements. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V: opinions of respected authorities, based on descriptive studies, narrative reviews, clinical experience, or reports of expert committees. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40519-022-01473-9. Springer International Publishing 2022-09-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9462607/ /pubmed/36085407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-022-01473-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Marzola, Enrica Panero, Matteo Longo, Paola Martini, Matteo Fernàndez-Aranda, Fernando Kaye, Walter H. Abbate-Daga, Giovanni Research in eating disorders: the misunderstanding of supposing serious mental illnesses as a niche specialty |
title | Research in eating disorders: the misunderstanding of supposing serious mental illnesses as a niche specialty |
title_full | Research in eating disorders: the misunderstanding of supposing serious mental illnesses as a niche specialty |
title_fullStr | Research in eating disorders: the misunderstanding of supposing serious mental illnesses as a niche specialty |
title_full_unstemmed | Research in eating disorders: the misunderstanding of supposing serious mental illnesses as a niche specialty |
title_short | Research in eating disorders: the misunderstanding of supposing serious mental illnesses as a niche specialty |
title_sort | research in eating disorders: the misunderstanding of supposing serious mental illnesses as a niche specialty |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9462607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36085407 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40519-022-01473-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marzolaenrica researchineatingdisordersthemisunderstandingofsupposingseriousmentalillnessesasanichespecialty AT paneromatteo researchineatingdisordersthemisunderstandingofsupposingseriousmentalillnessesasanichespecialty AT longopaola researchineatingdisordersthemisunderstandingofsupposingseriousmentalillnessesasanichespecialty AT martinimatteo researchineatingdisordersthemisunderstandingofsupposingseriousmentalillnessesasanichespecialty AT fernandezarandafernando researchineatingdisordersthemisunderstandingofsupposingseriousmentalillnessesasanichespecialty AT kayewalterh researchineatingdisordersthemisunderstandingofsupposingseriousmentalillnessesasanichespecialty AT abbatedagagiovanni researchineatingdisordersthemisunderstandingofsupposingseriousmentalillnessesasanichespecialty |