Cargando…
Zero‐inflated count distributions for capture–mark–reencounter data
The estimation of demographic parameters is a key component of evolutionary demography and conservation biology. Capture–mark–recapture methods have served as a fundamental tool for estimating demographic parameters. The accurate estimation of demographic parameters in capture–mark–recapture studies...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9274 |
_version_ | 1784787316538081280 |
---|---|
author | Riecke, Thomas V. Gibson, Daniel Sedinger, James S. Schaub, Michael |
author_facet | Riecke, Thomas V. Gibson, Daniel Sedinger, James S. Schaub, Michael |
author_sort | Riecke, Thomas V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The estimation of demographic parameters is a key component of evolutionary demography and conservation biology. Capture–mark–recapture methods have served as a fundamental tool for estimating demographic parameters. The accurate estimation of demographic parameters in capture–mark–recapture studies depends on accurate modeling of the observation process. Classic capture–mark–recapture models typically model the observation process as a Bernoulli or categorical trial with detection probability conditional on a marked individual's availability for detection (e.g., alive, or alive and present in a study area). Alternatives to this approach are underused, but may have great utility in capture–recapture studies. In this paper, we explore a simple concept: in the same way that counts contain more information about abundance than simple detection/non‐detection data, the number of encounters of individuals during observation occasions contains more information about the observation process than detection/non‐detection data for individuals during the same occasion. Rather than using Bernoulli or categorical distributions to estimate detection probability, we demonstrate the application of zero‐inflated Poisson and gamma‐Poisson distributions. The use of count distributions allows for inference on availability for encounter, as well as a wide variety of parameterizations for heterogeneity in the observation process. We demonstrate that this approach can accurately recover demographic and observation parameters in the presence of individual heterogeneity in detection probability and discuss some potential future extensions of this method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9463028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94630282022-09-28 Zero‐inflated count distributions for capture–mark–reencounter data Riecke, Thomas V. Gibson, Daniel Sedinger, James S. Schaub, Michael Ecol Evol Research Articles The estimation of demographic parameters is a key component of evolutionary demography and conservation biology. Capture–mark–recapture methods have served as a fundamental tool for estimating demographic parameters. The accurate estimation of demographic parameters in capture–mark–recapture studies depends on accurate modeling of the observation process. Classic capture–mark–recapture models typically model the observation process as a Bernoulli or categorical trial with detection probability conditional on a marked individual's availability for detection (e.g., alive, or alive and present in a study area). Alternatives to this approach are underused, but may have great utility in capture–recapture studies. In this paper, we explore a simple concept: in the same way that counts contain more information about abundance than simple detection/non‐detection data, the number of encounters of individuals during observation occasions contains more information about the observation process than detection/non‐detection data for individuals during the same occasion. Rather than using Bernoulli or categorical distributions to estimate detection probability, we demonstrate the application of zero‐inflated Poisson and gamma‐Poisson distributions. The use of count distributions allows for inference on availability for encounter, as well as a wide variety of parameterizations for heterogeneity in the observation process. We demonstrate that this approach can accurately recover demographic and observation parameters in the presence of individual heterogeneity in detection probability and discuss some potential future extensions of this method. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9463028/ /pubmed/36177128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9274 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Riecke, Thomas V. Gibson, Daniel Sedinger, James S. Schaub, Michael Zero‐inflated count distributions for capture–mark–reencounter data |
title | Zero‐inflated count distributions for capture–mark–reencounter data |
title_full | Zero‐inflated count distributions for capture–mark–reencounter data |
title_fullStr | Zero‐inflated count distributions for capture–mark–reencounter data |
title_full_unstemmed | Zero‐inflated count distributions for capture–mark–reencounter data |
title_short | Zero‐inflated count distributions for capture–mark–reencounter data |
title_sort | zero‐inflated count distributions for capture–mark–reencounter data |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36177128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9274 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rieckethomasv zeroinflatedcountdistributionsforcapturemarkreencounterdata AT gibsondaniel zeroinflatedcountdistributionsforcapturemarkreencounterdata AT sedingerjamess zeroinflatedcountdistributionsforcapturemarkreencounterdata AT schaubmichael zeroinflatedcountdistributionsforcapturemarkreencounterdata |