Cargando…

Stroke survivors partner in research: a case example of collaborative processes

The Canadian Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research supports the inclusion of patients as partners throughout the research process. Purposeful and meaningful engagement of patient partners after stroke can present unique challenges due to the potential impacts on cognition, communication, or mobilit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwok, Alyson, Cheung, Deacon, Gordon, Maysyn, Mudryk, Evan, Manns, Patricia J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36088341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00386-2
_version_ 1784787323227996160
author Kwok, Alyson
Cheung, Deacon
Gordon, Maysyn
Mudryk, Evan
Manns, Patricia J.
author_facet Kwok, Alyson
Cheung, Deacon
Gordon, Maysyn
Mudryk, Evan
Manns, Patricia J.
author_sort Kwok, Alyson
collection PubMed
description The Canadian Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research supports the inclusion of patients as partners throughout the research process. Purposeful and meaningful engagement of patient partners after stroke can present unique challenges due to the potential impacts on cognition, communication, or mobility. The purpose of this paper is to provide a case example of working together with three individuals who bring their post-stroke lived experience, including one person with aphasia, from study design through to dissemination. The designed and executed qualitative research was the purpose of this collaboration; this paper describes the collaborative process rather than the outcomes of the original research. The Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Patient Engagement Framework was followed to engage the patient partners fully as part of the research team. Patient partners were involved at regularly scheduled team meetings and provided guidance on key aspects of project design and decision-making. The patient partners provided robust and important contributions to many aspects of the research, including shaping interview questions, assisting with thematic analysis, and contributing to the dissemination of research findings. Effective team dynamics were fostered by focusing on the value of the lived experience knowledge, using best-practice communication strategies, as well as taking time for relationship-building and story sharing. With appropriate support and guidance, the individuals who have experienced stroke were valuable contributing members of our research team.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9463054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94630542022-09-10 Stroke survivors partner in research: a case example of collaborative processes Kwok, Alyson Cheung, Deacon Gordon, Maysyn Mudryk, Evan Manns, Patricia J. Res Involv Engagem Comment The Canadian Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research supports the inclusion of patients as partners throughout the research process. Purposeful and meaningful engagement of patient partners after stroke can present unique challenges due to the potential impacts on cognition, communication, or mobility. The purpose of this paper is to provide a case example of working together with three individuals who bring their post-stroke lived experience, including one person with aphasia, from study design through to dissemination. The designed and executed qualitative research was the purpose of this collaboration; this paper describes the collaborative process rather than the outcomes of the original research. The Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Patient Engagement Framework was followed to engage the patient partners fully as part of the research team. Patient partners were involved at regularly scheduled team meetings and provided guidance on key aspects of project design and decision-making. The patient partners provided robust and important contributions to many aspects of the research, including shaping interview questions, assisting with thematic analysis, and contributing to the dissemination of research findings. Effective team dynamics were fostered by focusing on the value of the lived experience knowledge, using best-practice communication strategies, as well as taking time for relationship-building and story sharing. With appropriate support and guidance, the individuals who have experienced stroke were valuable contributing members of our research team. BioMed Central 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9463054/ /pubmed/36088341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00386-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Comment
Kwok, Alyson
Cheung, Deacon
Gordon, Maysyn
Mudryk, Evan
Manns, Patricia J.
Stroke survivors partner in research: a case example of collaborative processes
title Stroke survivors partner in research: a case example of collaborative processes
title_full Stroke survivors partner in research: a case example of collaborative processes
title_fullStr Stroke survivors partner in research: a case example of collaborative processes
title_full_unstemmed Stroke survivors partner in research: a case example of collaborative processes
title_short Stroke survivors partner in research: a case example of collaborative processes
title_sort stroke survivors partner in research: a case example of collaborative processes
topic Comment
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36088341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00386-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kwokalyson strokesurvivorspartnerinresearchacaseexampleofcollaborativeprocesses
AT cheungdeacon strokesurvivorspartnerinresearchacaseexampleofcollaborativeprocesses
AT gordonmaysyn strokesurvivorspartnerinresearchacaseexampleofcollaborativeprocesses
AT mudrykevan strokesurvivorspartnerinresearchacaseexampleofcollaborativeprocesses
AT mannspatriciaj strokesurvivorspartnerinresearchacaseexampleofcollaborativeprocesses