Cargando…
Complex network analysis of volatility spillovers between global financial indicators and G20 stock markets
This paper analyses the dynamic transmission mechanism of volatility spillovers between key global financial indicators and G20 stock markets. To examine volatility spillover relations, we combine a bivariate GARCH-BEKK model with complex network theory. Specifically, we construct a volatility netwo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02290-w |
_version_ | 1784787324555493376 |
---|---|
author | Korkusuz, Burak McMillan, David G. Kambouroudis, Dimos |
author_facet | Korkusuz, Burak McMillan, David G. Kambouroudis, Dimos |
author_sort | Korkusuz, Burak |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper analyses the dynamic transmission mechanism of volatility spillovers between key global financial indicators and G20 stock markets. To examine volatility spillover relations, we combine a bivariate GARCH-BEKK model with complex network theory. Specifically, we construct a volatility network of international financial markets utilising the spatial connectedness of spillovers (consisting of nodes and edges). The findings show that spillover relations between global variables and G20 markets vary significantly across five identified sub-periods. Notably, networks are much denser in crisis periods compared to non-crisis periods. In comparing two crisis periods, Global Financial Crisis (2008) and COVID-19 Crisis (2020) periods, the network statistics suggest that volatility spillovers in the latter period are more transitive and intense than the former. This suggests that financial volatility spreads more rapidly and directly through key financial indicators to the G20 stock markets. For example, oil and bonds are the largest volatility senders, while the markets of Saudi Arabia, Russia, South Africa, and Brazil are the main volatility receivers. In the former crisis, the source of financial volatility concentrates primarily in the USA, Australia, Canada, and Saudi Arabia, which are the largest volatility senders and receivers. China emerges as generally the least sensitive market to external volatility. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9463059 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94630592022-09-10 Complex network analysis of volatility spillovers between global financial indicators and G20 stock markets Korkusuz, Burak McMillan, David G. Kambouroudis, Dimos Empir Econ Article This paper analyses the dynamic transmission mechanism of volatility spillovers between key global financial indicators and G20 stock markets. To examine volatility spillover relations, we combine a bivariate GARCH-BEKK model with complex network theory. Specifically, we construct a volatility network of international financial markets utilising the spatial connectedness of spillovers (consisting of nodes and edges). The findings show that spillover relations between global variables and G20 markets vary significantly across five identified sub-periods. Notably, networks are much denser in crisis periods compared to non-crisis periods. In comparing two crisis periods, Global Financial Crisis (2008) and COVID-19 Crisis (2020) periods, the network statistics suggest that volatility spillovers in the latter period are more transitive and intense than the former. This suggests that financial volatility spreads more rapidly and directly through key financial indicators to the G20 stock markets. For example, oil and bonds are the largest volatility senders, while the markets of Saudi Arabia, Russia, South Africa, and Brazil are the main volatility receivers. In the former crisis, the source of financial volatility concentrates primarily in the USA, Australia, Canada, and Saudi Arabia, which are the largest volatility senders and receivers. China emerges as generally the least sensitive market to external volatility. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-09-10 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9463059/ /pubmed/36106329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02290-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Korkusuz, Burak McMillan, David G. Kambouroudis, Dimos Complex network analysis of volatility spillovers between global financial indicators and G20 stock markets |
title | Complex network analysis of volatility spillovers between global financial indicators and G20 stock markets |
title_full | Complex network analysis of volatility spillovers between global financial indicators and G20 stock markets |
title_fullStr | Complex network analysis of volatility spillovers between global financial indicators and G20 stock markets |
title_full_unstemmed | Complex network analysis of volatility spillovers between global financial indicators and G20 stock markets |
title_short | Complex network analysis of volatility spillovers between global financial indicators and G20 stock markets |
title_sort | complex network analysis of volatility spillovers between global financial indicators and g20 stock markets |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463059/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106329 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02290-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT korkusuzburak complexnetworkanalysisofvolatilityspilloversbetweenglobalfinancialindicatorsandg20stockmarkets AT mcmillandavidg complexnetworkanalysisofvolatilityspilloversbetweenglobalfinancialindicatorsandg20stockmarkets AT kambouroudisdimos complexnetworkanalysisofvolatilityspilloversbetweenglobalfinancialindicatorsandg20stockmarkets |