Cargando…
Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high?
PURPOSE: Women remain underrepresented in the exercise thermoregulation literature despite their participation in leisure-time and occupational physical activity in heat-stressful environments continuing to increase. Here, we determined the relative contribution of the primary ovarian hormones (estr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35796828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04996-2 |
_version_ | 1784787350368288768 |
---|---|
author | Zheng, Huixin Badenhorst, Claire E. Lei, Tze-Huan Che Muhamed, Ahmad Munir Liao, Yi-Hung Fujii, Naoto Kondo, Narihiko Mündel, Toby |
author_facet | Zheng, Huixin Badenhorst, Claire E. Lei, Tze-Huan Che Muhamed, Ahmad Munir Liao, Yi-Hung Fujii, Naoto Kondo, Narihiko Mündel, Toby |
author_sort | Zheng, Huixin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Women remain underrepresented in the exercise thermoregulation literature despite their participation in leisure-time and occupational physical activity in heat-stressful environments continuing to increase. Here, we determined the relative contribution of the primary ovarian hormones (estrogen [E(2)] and progesterone [P(4)]) alongside other morphological (e.g., body mass), physiological (e.g., sweat rates), functional (e.g., aerobic fitness) and environmental (e.g., vapor pressure) factors in explaining the individual variation in core temperature responses for trained women working at very high metabolic rates, specifically peak core temperature (T(peak)) and work output (mean power output). METHODS: Thirty-six trained women (32 ± 9 year, 53 ± 9 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)), distinguished by intra-participant (early follicular and mid-luteal phases) or inter-participant (ovulatory vs. anovulatory vs. oral contraceptive pill user) differences in their endogenous E(2) and P(4) concentrations, completed a self-paced 30-min cycling work trial in warm–dry (2.2 ± 0.2 kPa, 34.1 ± 0.2 °C, 41.4 ± 3.4% RH) and/or warm–humid (3.4 ± 0.1 kPa, 30.2 ± 1.2 °C, 79.8 ± 3.7% RH) conditions that yielded 115 separate trials. Stepwise linear regression was used to explain the variance of the dependent variables. RESULTS: Models were able to account for 60% of the variance in T(peak) ([Formula: see text] (2): 41% core temperature at the start of work trial, [Formula: see text] (2): 15% power output, [Formula: see text] (2): 4% [E(2)]) and 44% of the variance in mean power output ([Formula: see text] (2): 35% peak aerobic power, [Formula: see text] (2): 9% perceived exertion). CONCLUSION: E(2) contributes a small amount toward the core temperature response in trained women, whereby starting core temperature and peak aerobic power explain the greatest variance in T(peak) and work output, respectively. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9463225 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94632252022-09-11 Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high? Zheng, Huixin Badenhorst, Claire E. Lei, Tze-Huan Che Muhamed, Ahmad Munir Liao, Yi-Hung Fujii, Naoto Kondo, Narihiko Mündel, Toby Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article PURPOSE: Women remain underrepresented in the exercise thermoregulation literature despite their participation in leisure-time and occupational physical activity in heat-stressful environments continuing to increase. Here, we determined the relative contribution of the primary ovarian hormones (estrogen [E(2)] and progesterone [P(4)]) alongside other morphological (e.g., body mass), physiological (e.g., sweat rates), functional (e.g., aerobic fitness) and environmental (e.g., vapor pressure) factors in explaining the individual variation in core temperature responses for trained women working at very high metabolic rates, specifically peak core temperature (T(peak)) and work output (mean power output). METHODS: Thirty-six trained women (32 ± 9 year, 53 ± 9 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)), distinguished by intra-participant (early follicular and mid-luteal phases) or inter-participant (ovulatory vs. anovulatory vs. oral contraceptive pill user) differences in their endogenous E(2) and P(4) concentrations, completed a self-paced 30-min cycling work trial in warm–dry (2.2 ± 0.2 kPa, 34.1 ± 0.2 °C, 41.4 ± 3.4% RH) and/or warm–humid (3.4 ± 0.1 kPa, 30.2 ± 1.2 °C, 79.8 ± 3.7% RH) conditions that yielded 115 separate trials. Stepwise linear regression was used to explain the variance of the dependent variables. RESULTS: Models were able to account for 60% of the variance in T(peak) ([Formula: see text] (2): 41% core temperature at the start of work trial, [Formula: see text] (2): 15% power output, [Formula: see text] (2): 4% [E(2)]) and 44% of the variance in mean power output ([Formula: see text] (2): 35% peak aerobic power, [Formula: see text] (2): 9% perceived exertion). CONCLUSION: E(2) contributes a small amount toward the core temperature response in trained women, whereby starting core temperature and peak aerobic power explain the greatest variance in T(peak) and work output, respectively. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9463225/ /pubmed/35796828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04996-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zheng, Huixin Badenhorst, Claire E. Lei, Tze-Huan Che Muhamed, Ahmad Munir Liao, Yi-Hung Fujii, Naoto Kondo, Narihiko Mündel, Toby Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high? |
title | Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high? |
title_full | Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high? |
title_fullStr | Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high? |
title_short | Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high? |
title_sort | do e(2) and p(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high? |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463225/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35796828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04996-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhenghuixin doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh AT badenhorstclairee doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh AT leitzehuan doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh AT chemuhamedahmadmunir doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh AT liaoyihung doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh AT fujiinaoto doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh AT kondonarihiko doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh AT mundeltoby doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh |