Cargando…

Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high?

PURPOSE: Women remain underrepresented in the exercise thermoregulation literature despite their participation in leisure-time and occupational physical activity in heat-stressful environments continuing to increase. Here, we determined the relative contribution of the primary ovarian hormones (estr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zheng, Huixin, Badenhorst, Claire E., Lei, Tze-Huan, Che Muhamed, Ahmad Munir, Liao, Yi-Hung, Fujii, Naoto, Kondo, Narihiko, Mündel, Toby
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35796828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04996-2
_version_ 1784787350368288768
author Zheng, Huixin
Badenhorst, Claire E.
Lei, Tze-Huan
Che Muhamed, Ahmad Munir
Liao, Yi-Hung
Fujii, Naoto
Kondo, Narihiko
Mündel, Toby
author_facet Zheng, Huixin
Badenhorst, Claire E.
Lei, Tze-Huan
Che Muhamed, Ahmad Munir
Liao, Yi-Hung
Fujii, Naoto
Kondo, Narihiko
Mündel, Toby
author_sort Zheng, Huixin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Women remain underrepresented in the exercise thermoregulation literature despite their participation in leisure-time and occupational physical activity in heat-stressful environments continuing to increase. Here, we determined the relative contribution of the primary ovarian hormones (estrogen [E(2)] and progesterone [P(4)]) alongside other morphological (e.g., body mass), physiological (e.g., sweat rates), functional (e.g., aerobic fitness) and environmental (e.g., vapor pressure) factors in explaining the individual variation in core temperature responses for trained women working at very high metabolic rates, specifically peak core temperature (T(peak)) and work output (mean power output). METHODS: Thirty-six trained women (32 ± 9 year, 53 ± 9 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)), distinguished by intra-participant (early follicular and mid-luteal phases) or inter-participant (ovulatory vs. anovulatory vs. oral contraceptive pill user) differences in their endogenous E(2) and P(4) concentrations, completed a self-paced 30-min cycling work trial in warm–dry (2.2 ± 0.2 kPa, 34.1 ± 0.2 °C, 41.4 ± 3.4% RH) and/or warm–humid (3.4 ± 0.1 kPa, 30.2 ± 1.2 °C, 79.8 ± 3.7% RH) conditions that yielded 115 separate trials. Stepwise linear regression was used to explain the variance of the dependent variables. RESULTS: Models were able to account for 60% of the variance in T(peak) ([Formula: see text] (2): 41% core temperature at the start of work trial, [Formula: see text] (2): 15% power output, [Formula: see text] (2): 4% [E(2)]) and 44% of the variance in mean power output ([Formula: see text] (2): 35% peak aerobic power, [Formula: see text] (2): 9% perceived exertion). CONCLUSION: E(2) contributes a small amount toward the core temperature response in trained women, whereby starting core temperature and peak aerobic power explain the greatest variance in T(peak) and work output, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9463225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94632252022-09-11 Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high? Zheng, Huixin Badenhorst, Claire E. Lei, Tze-Huan Che Muhamed, Ahmad Munir Liao, Yi-Hung Fujii, Naoto Kondo, Narihiko Mündel, Toby Eur J Appl Physiol Original Article PURPOSE: Women remain underrepresented in the exercise thermoregulation literature despite their participation in leisure-time and occupational physical activity in heat-stressful environments continuing to increase. Here, we determined the relative contribution of the primary ovarian hormones (estrogen [E(2)] and progesterone [P(4)]) alongside other morphological (e.g., body mass), physiological (e.g., sweat rates), functional (e.g., aerobic fitness) and environmental (e.g., vapor pressure) factors in explaining the individual variation in core temperature responses for trained women working at very high metabolic rates, specifically peak core temperature (T(peak)) and work output (mean power output). METHODS: Thirty-six trained women (32 ± 9 year, 53 ± 9 ml·kg(−1)·min(−1)), distinguished by intra-participant (early follicular and mid-luteal phases) or inter-participant (ovulatory vs. anovulatory vs. oral contraceptive pill user) differences in their endogenous E(2) and P(4) concentrations, completed a self-paced 30-min cycling work trial in warm–dry (2.2 ± 0.2 kPa, 34.1 ± 0.2 °C, 41.4 ± 3.4% RH) and/or warm–humid (3.4 ± 0.1 kPa, 30.2 ± 1.2 °C, 79.8 ± 3.7% RH) conditions that yielded 115 separate trials. Stepwise linear regression was used to explain the variance of the dependent variables. RESULTS: Models were able to account for 60% of the variance in T(peak) ([Formula: see text] (2): 41% core temperature at the start of work trial, [Formula: see text] (2): 15% power output, [Formula: see text] (2): 4% [E(2)]) and 44% of the variance in mean power output ([Formula: see text] (2): 35% peak aerobic power, [Formula: see text] (2): 9% perceived exertion). CONCLUSION: E(2) contributes a small amount toward the core temperature response in trained women, whereby starting core temperature and peak aerobic power explain the greatest variance in T(peak) and work output, respectively. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9463225/ /pubmed/35796828 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04996-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Zheng, Huixin
Badenhorst, Claire E.
Lei, Tze-Huan
Che Muhamed, Ahmad Munir
Liao, Yi-Hung
Fujii, Naoto
Kondo, Narihiko
Mündel, Toby
Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high?
title Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high?
title_full Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high?
title_fullStr Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high?
title_full_unstemmed Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high?
title_short Do E(2) and P(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high?
title_sort do e(2) and p(4) contribute to the explained variance in core temperature response for trained women during exertional heat stress when metabolic rates are very high?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35796828
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04996-2
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenghuixin doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh
AT badenhorstclairee doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh
AT leitzehuan doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh
AT chemuhamedahmadmunir doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh
AT liaoyihung doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh
AT fujiinaoto doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh
AT kondonarihiko doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh
AT mundeltoby doe2andp4contributetotheexplainedvarianceincoretemperatureresponsefortrainedwomenduringexertionalheatstresswhenmetabolicratesareveryhigh