Responses of stance leg muscles induced by support surface translation during gait

This study determined the presence of the muscle responses to the support surface translation in the stance leg during gait and examined the effect of the direction and time point of the translation and that of the cognitive process on the responses. The rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), sol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fukuda, Shiho, Oda, Hitoshi, Kawasaki, Taku, Sawaguchi, Yasushi, Matsuoka, Masakazu, Tsujinaka, Ryo, Hiraoka, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463582/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36097487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10470
Descripción
Sumario:This study determined the presence of the muscle responses to the support surface translation in the stance leg during gait and examined the effect of the direction and time point of the translation and that of the cognitive process on the responses. The rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), soleus (SOL), and tibialis anterior (TA) muscles in the stance leg were tested. There was no significant effect of cognitive process on the electromyographic (EMG) activity induced by the translation of the support surface. In all muscles except the SOL, the EMG amplitude increased 0–300 ​ms after the support surface translation at the initial stance (IS) or middle stance (MS) of the tested leg. This means that the EMG activity in the leg muscles other than the SOL occurs after the support surface translation at the IS or MS no matter the direction of the translation. The EMG amplitude was not changed after the translation at the late stance, indicating that the translation does not influence the EMG amplitude at the double limb support phase with the tested leg behind the other. In the SOL, the EMG amplitude increased after the backward translation at the IS and after the forward translation at the MS, but decreased after the forward translation at the IS, indicating that the support surface translation-induced change in the EMG amplitude of the SOL is dependent on its direction. The change in the EMG amplitude of the TA and RF induced by the forward translation was greatest when the translation was given at the IS. In the SOL, the decrease in the EMG amplitude after the forward translation and the increase in the amplitude after the backward translation were greatest at the IS. Taken together, the change in the EMG amplitude induced by the support surface translation is greatest when the translation is given at the IS. The increase in the EMG amplitude in the TA and RF after the forward translation was greater than that after the backward translation at the IS, indicating that the EMG activity of the frontal leg muscles after the forward translation is greater when the translation is given at the IS.

Ejemplares similares