Cargando…

Comparison of Multidimensional Frailty Instruments for Estimation of Long-term Patient-Centered Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery

IMPORTANCE: Little is known about the performance of available frailty instruments in estimating patient-relevant outcomes after cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVE: To examine how well the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) frailty indicator, the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), and the Preoper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sun, Louise Y., Jabagi, Habib, Fang, Jiming, Lee, Douglas S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36083582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30959
_version_ 1784787428795482112
author Sun, Louise Y.
Jabagi, Habib
Fang, Jiming
Lee, Douglas S.
author_facet Sun, Louise Y.
Jabagi, Habib
Fang, Jiming
Lee, Douglas S.
author_sort Sun, Louise Y.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Little is known about the performance of available frailty instruments in estimating patient-relevant outcomes after cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVE: To examine how well the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) frailty indicator, the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), and the Preoperative Frailty Index (PFI) estimate long-term patient-centered outcomes after cardiac surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Ontario, Canada, among residents 18 years and older who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic, mitral or tricuspid valve, or thoracic aorta surgery between October 2008 and March 2017. Long-term care residents, those with discordant surgical encounters, and those receiving dialysis or dependent on a ventilator within 90 days were excluded. Statistical analysis was conducted from July 2021 to January 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was patient-defined adverse cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events (PACE), defined as the composite of severe stroke, heart failure, long-term care admission, new-onset dialysis, and ventilator dependence. Secondary outcomes included mortality and individual PACE events. The association between frailty and PACE was examined using cause-specific hazard models with death as a competing risk, and the association between frailty and death was examined using Cox models. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were determined over 10 years of follow-up for each frailty instrument. RESULTS: Of 88 456 patients (22 924 [25.9%] female; mean [SD] age, 66.3 [11.1] years), 14 935 (16.9%) were frail according to ACG criteria, 63 095 (71.3%) according to HFRS, and 76 754 (86.8%) according to PFI. Patients with frailty were more likely to be older, female, and rural residents; to have lower income and multimorbidity; and to undergo urgent surgery. Patients meeting ACG criteria (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.60-1.71) and those with higher HFRS scores (HR per 1.0-point increment, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.10) and PFI scores (HR per 0.1-point increment, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.73-1.78) had higher rates of PACE. Similar magnitudes of association were observed for each frailty instrument with death and individual PACE components. The HFRS had the highest AUROC for estimating PACE during the first 2 years and death during the first 4 years, after which the PFI had the highest AUROC. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings could help to tailor the use of frailty instruments by outcome and follow-up duration, thus optimizing preoperative risk stratification, patient-centered decision-making, candidate selection for prehabilitation, and personalized monitoring and health resource planning in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9463609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94636092022-09-24 Comparison of Multidimensional Frailty Instruments for Estimation of Long-term Patient-Centered Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery Sun, Louise Y. Jabagi, Habib Fang, Jiming Lee, Douglas S. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Little is known about the performance of available frailty instruments in estimating patient-relevant outcomes after cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVE: To examine how well the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG) frailty indicator, the Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), and the Preoperative Frailty Index (PFI) estimate long-term patient-centered outcomes after cardiac surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Ontario, Canada, among residents 18 years and older who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic, mitral or tricuspid valve, or thoracic aorta surgery between October 2008 and March 2017. Long-term care residents, those with discordant surgical encounters, and those receiving dialysis or dependent on a ventilator within 90 days were excluded. Statistical analysis was conducted from July 2021 to January 2022. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was patient-defined adverse cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events (PACE), defined as the composite of severe stroke, heart failure, long-term care admission, new-onset dialysis, and ventilator dependence. Secondary outcomes included mortality and individual PACE events. The association between frailty and PACE was examined using cause-specific hazard models with death as a competing risk, and the association between frailty and death was examined using Cox models. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) were determined over 10 years of follow-up for each frailty instrument. RESULTS: Of 88 456 patients (22 924 [25.9%] female; mean [SD] age, 66.3 [11.1] years), 14 935 (16.9%) were frail according to ACG criteria, 63 095 (71.3%) according to HFRS, and 76 754 (86.8%) according to PFI. Patients with frailty were more likely to be older, female, and rural residents; to have lower income and multimorbidity; and to undergo urgent surgery. Patients meeting ACG criteria (hazard ratio [HR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.60-1.71) and those with higher HFRS scores (HR per 1.0-point increment, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.10) and PFI scores (HR per 0.1-point increment, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.73-1.78) had higher rates of PACE. Similar magnitudes of association were observed for each frailty instrument with death and individual PACE components. The HFRS had the highest AUROC for estimating PACE during the first 2 years and death during the first 4 years, after which the PFI had the highest AUROC. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings could help to tailor the use of frailty instruments by outcome and follow-up duration, thus optimizing preoperative risk stratification, patient-centered decision-making, candidate selection for prehabilitation, and personalized monitoring and health resource planning in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. American Medical Association 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9463609/ /pubmed/36083582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30959 Text en Copyright 2022 Sun LY et al. JAMA Network Open. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
Sun, Louise Y.
Jabagi, Habib
Fang, Jiming
Lee, Douglas S.
Comparison of Multidimensional Frailty Instruments for Estimation of Long-term Patient-Centered Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery
title Comparison of Multidimensional Frailty Instruments for Estimation of Long-term Patient-Centered Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery
title_full Comparison of Multidimensional Frailty Instruments for Estimation of Long-term Patient-Centered Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of Multidimensional Frailty Instruments for Estimation of Long-term Patient-Centered Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Multidimensional Frailty Instruments for Estimation of Long-term Patient-Centered Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery
title_short Comparison of Multidimensional Frailty Instruments for Estimation of Long-term Patient-Centered Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery
title_sort comparison of multidimensional frailty instruments for estimation of long-term patient-centered outcomes after cardiac surgery
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36083582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30959
work_keys_str_mv AT sunlouisey comparisonofmultidimensionalfrailtyinstrumentsforestimationoflongtermpatientcenteredoutcomesaftercardiacsurgery
AT jabagihabib comparisonofmultidimensionalfrailtyinstrumentsforestimationoflongtermpatientcenteredoutcomesaftercardiacsurgery
AT fangjiming comparisonofmultidimensionalfrailtyinstrumentsforestimationoflongtermpatientcenteredoutcomesaftercardiacsurgery
AT leedouglass comparisonofmultidimensionalfrailtyinstrumentsforestimationoflongtermpatientcenteredoutcomesaftercardiacsurgery