Cargando…
Disguising Reddit sources and the efficacy of ethical research
Concerned researchers of online forums might implement what Bruckman (2002) referred to as disguise. Heavy disguise, for example, elides usernames and rewords quoted prose so that sources are difficult to locate via search engines. This can protect users (who might be members of vulnerable populatio...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09663-w |
_version_ | 1784787435233738752 |
---|---|
author | Reagle, Joseph |
author_facet | Reagle, Joseph |
author_sort | Reagle, Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | Concerned researchers of online forums might implement what Bruckman (2002) referred to as disguise. Heavy disguise, for example, elides usernames and rewords quoted prose so that sources are difficult to locate via search engines. This can protect users (who might be members of vulnerable populations, including minors) from additional harms (such as harassment or additional identification). But does disguise work? I analyze 22 Reddit research reports: 3 of light disguise, using verbatim quotes, and 19 of heavier disguise, using reworded phrases. I test if their sources can be located via three different search services (i.e., Reddit, Google, and RedditSearch). I also interview 10 of the reports’ authors about their sourcing practices, influences, and experiences. Disguising sources is effective only if done and tested rigorously; I was able to locate all of the verbatim sources (3/3) and many of the reworded sources (11/19). There is a lack of understanding, among users and researchers, about how online messages can be located, especially after deletion. Researchers should conduct similar site-specific investigations and develop practical guidelines and tools for improving the ethical use of online sources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9463657 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94636572022-09-10 Disguising Reddit sources and the efficacy of ethical research Reagle, Joseph Ethics Inf Technol Original Paper Concerned researchers of online forums might implement what Bruckman (2002) referred to as disguise. Heavy disguise, for example, elides usernames and rewords quoted prose so that sources are difficult to locate via search engines. This can protect users (who might be members of vulnerable populations, including minors) from additional harms (such as harassment or additional identification). But does disguise work? I analyze 22 Reddit research reports: 3 of light disguise, using verbatim quotes, and 19 of heavier disguise, using reworded phrases. I test if their sources can be located via three different search services (i.e., Reddit, Google, and RedditSearch). I also interview 10 of the reports’ authors about their sourcing practices, influences, and experiences. Disguising sources is effective only if done and tested rigorously; I was able to locate all of the verbatim sources (3/3) and many of the reworded sources (11/19). There is a lack of understanding, among users and researchers, about how online messages can be located, especially after deletion. Researchers should conduct similar site-specific investigations and develop practical guidelines and tools for improving the ethical use of online sources. Springer Netherlands 2022-09-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9463657/ /pubmed/36105629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09663-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Reagle, Joseph Disguising Reddit sources and the efficacy of ethical research |
title | Disguising Reddit sources and the efficacy of ethical research |
title_full | Disguising Reddit sources and the efficacy of ethical research |
title_fullStr | Disguising Reddit sources and the efficacy of ethical research |
title_full_unstemmed | Disguising Reddit sources and the efficacy of ethical research |
title_short | Disguising Reddit sources and the efficacy of ethical research |
title_sort | disguising reddit sources and the efficacy of ethical research |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463657/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09663-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reaglejoseph disguisingredditsourcesandtheefficacyofethicalresearch |