Cargando…

Differences in close-work activities and optical axis length between only children and non-only children: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the differences in optical axial length and close-work activities between only children and children with siblings in Wenzhou. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional population-based study. In total, 2913 school-aged children and their parents in Wenzhou were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yanhui, Lin, Yaoyao, Jiang, Dandan, Liu, Linjie, Lin, Shudan, He, Juan, Liang, Youping, Sun, Bing, Chen, Yanyan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36088410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03586-7
_version_ 1784787468574261248
author Wang, Yanhui
Lin, Yaoyao
Jiang, Dandan
Liu, Linjie
Lin, Shudan
He, Juan
Liang, Youping
Sun, Bing
Chen, Yanyan
author_facet Wang, Yanhui
Lin, Yaoyao
Jiang, Dandan
Liu, Linjie
Lin, Shudan
He, Juan
Liang, Youping
Sun, Bing
Chen, Yanyan
author_sort Wang, Yanhui
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the differences in optical axial length and close-work activities between only children and children with siblings in Wenzhou. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional population-based study. In total, 2913 school-aged children and their parents in Wenzhou were included as study subjects from April to May 2021. Data regarding the optical axial length, spherical equivalent refraction, number of children in a family, parental myopia, and close-work activities were collected through eye examinations and questionnaires. A multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the number of children in a family and optical axial length. RESULTS: The children were aged 9.80 ± 3.41 years. The overall percentage of children with an axial length > 24 mm was 38.9%, 44.5% in only children and 35.6% in multiples. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of having an AL > 24 mm were 1.24 times higher in only children than in multiples (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.025–1.480, P = 0.028). Only children were 1.331 times more likely to perform homework > 1 h on weekends than multiples (OR: 1.331, 95% CI: 1.049–1.688, P = 0.019). Only children in upper grades were 1.543 times more likely to perform homework > 1 h on weekends than multiples (OR: 1.543, 95% CI: 1.065–2.235, P = 0.025). Boys who were only children were more likely to attend three or more extracurricular classes for academic subjects than multiples (OR: 1.224, 95% CI: 1.011–1.562, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Being an only child may be associated with a higher risk of myopia and higher odds of close-work behaviors. Only children, especially those in upper grades, are more likely to spend more time on homework than their peers who are multiples. Only children, especially boys, are more likely to attend extracurricular classes in academic subjects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered as ChiCTR1900020584 at www.Chictr.org.cn.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9463816
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94638162022-09-11 Differences in close-work activities and optical axis length between only children and non-only children: a cross-sectional study Wang, Yanhui Lin, Yaoyao Jiang, Dandan Liu, Linjie Lin, Shudan He, Juan Liang, Youping Sun, Bing Chen, Yanyan BMC Pediatr Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the differences in optical axial length and close-work activities between only children and children with siblings in Wenzhou. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional population-based study. In total, 2913 school-aged children and their parents in Wenzhou were included as study subjects from April to May 2021. Data regarding the optical axial length, spherical equivalent refraction, number of children in a family, parental myopia, and close-work activities were collected through eye examinations and questionnaires. A multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the association between the number of children in a family and optical axial length. RESULTS: The children were aged 9.80 ± 3.41 years. The overall percentage of children with an axial length > 24 mm was 38.9%, 44.5% in only children and 35.6% in multiples. The multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of having an AL > 24 mm were 1.24 times higher in only children than in multiples (OR: 1.24, 95% CI: 1.025–1.480, P = 0.028). Only children were 1.331 times more likely to perform homework > 1 h on weekends than multiples (OR: 1.331, 95% CI: 1.049–1.688, P = 0.019). Only children in upper grades were 1.543 times more likely to perform homework > 1 h on weekends than multiples (OR: 1.543, 95% CI: 1.065–2.235, P = 0.025). Boys who were only children were more likely to attend three or more extracurricular classes for academic subjects than multiples (OR: 1.224, 95% CI: 1.011–1.562, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Being an only child may be associated with a higher risk of myopia and higher odds of close-work behaviors. Only children, especially those in upper grades, are more likely to spend more time on homework than their peers who are multiples. Only children, especially boys, are more likely to attend extracurricular classes in academic subjects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered as ChiCTR1900020584 at www.Chictr.org.cn. BioMed Central 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9463816/ /pubmed/36088410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03586-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Yanhui
Lin, Yaoyao
Jiang, Dandan
Liu, Linjie
Lin, Shudan
He, Juan
Liang, Youping
Sun, Bing
Chen, Yanyan
Differences in close-work activities and optical axis length between only children and non-only children: a cross-sectional study
title Differences in close-work activities and optical axis length between only children and non-only children: a cross-sectional study
title_full Differences in close-work activities and optical axis length between only children and non-only children: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Differences in close-work activities and optical axis length between only children and non-only children: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Differences in close-work activities and optical axis length between only children and non-only children: a cross-sectional study
title_short Differences in close-work activities and optical axis length between only children and non-only children: a cross-sectional study
title_sort differences in close-work activities and optical axis length between only children and non-only children: a cross-sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9463816/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36088410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-022-03586-7
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyanhui differencesincloseworkactivitiesandopticalaxislengthbetweenonlychildrenandnononlychildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT linyaoyao differencesincloseworkactivitiesandopticalaxislengthbetweenonlychildrenandnononlychildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT jiangdandan differencesincloseworkactivitiesandopticalaxislengthbetweenonlychildrenandnononlychildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT liulinjie differencesincloseworkactivitiesandopticalaxislengthbetweenonlychildrenandnononlychildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT linshudan differencesincloseworkactivitiesandopticalaxislengthbetweenonlychildrenandnononlychildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT hejuan differencesincloseworkactivitiesandopticalaxislengthbetweenonlychildrenandnononlychildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT liangyouping differencesincloseworkactivitiesandopticalaxislengthbetweenonlychildrenandnononlychildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT sunbing differencesincloseworkactivitiesandopticalaxislengthbetweenonlychildrenandnononlychildrenacrosssectionalstudy
AT chenyanyan differencesincloseworkactivitiesandopticalaxislengthbetweenonlychildrenandnononlychildrenacrosssectionalstudy