Cargando…

Optimizing MATRix as remission induction in PCNSL: de-escalated induction treatment in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma

BACKGROUND: Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the central nervous system (PCNSL) is a rare disorder with an increasing incidence over the past decades. High-level evidence has been reported for the MATRix regimen (high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), high-dose AraC (HD-AraC), thiotepa and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wendler, Julia, Fox, Christopher P., Valk, Elke, Steinheber, Cora, Fricker, Heidi, Isbell, Lisa K., Neumaier, Simone, Okosun, Jessica, Scherer, Florian, Ihorst, Gabriele, Cwynarski, Kate, Schorb, Elisabeth, Illerhaus, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36088292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09723-w
_version_ 1784787507968212992
author Wendler, Julia
Fox, Christopher P.
Valk, Elke
Steinheber, Cora
Fricker, Heidi
Isbell, Lisa K.
Neumaier, Simone
Okosun, Jessica
Scherer, Florian
Ihorst, Gabriele
Cwynarski, Kate
Schorb, Elisabeth
Illerhaus, Gerald
author_facet Wendler, Julia
Fox, Christopher P.
Valk, Elke
Steinheber, Cora
Fricker, Heidi
Isbell, Lisa K.
Neumaier, Simone
Okosun, Jessica
Scherer, Florian
Ihorst, Gabriele
Cwynarski, Kate
Schorb, Elisabeth
Illerhaus, Gerald
author_sort Wendler, Julia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the central nervous system (PCNSL) is a rare disorder with an increasing incidence over the past decades. High-level evidence has been reported for the MATRix regimen (high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), high-dose AraC (HD-AraC), thiotepa and rituximab) followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) supporting this approach to be considered a standard therapy in newly diagnosed PCNSL patients ≤ 70 years. However, early treatment-related toxicities (predominantly infectious complications), occurring in up to 28% per MATRix cycle, diminish its therapeutic success. Furthermore, sensitivity to first-line treatment is an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival (OS) in PCNSL. Thus, patients achieving early partial remission (PR) after 2 cycles of MATRix might be over-treated with 4 cycles, in the context of consolidation HCT-ASCT. METHODS: This is an open-label, multicentre, randomized phase III trial with two parallel arms. 326 immunocompetent patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL will be recruited from 37 German, 1 Austrian and 12 UK sites. Additional IELSG (International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group) sites are planned. The objective is to demonstrate superiority of a de-escalated and optimised remission induction treatment strategy, followed by HCT-ASCT. Randomization (1:1) will be performed after completion of all screening procedures. Patients in Arm A (control treatment) will receive 4 cycles of MATRix. Patients in Arm B (experimental treatment) will receive a pre-phase (R/HD-MTX), followed by 2 cycles of MATRix. Patients in both arms achieving PR or better will proceed to HCT-ASCT (BCNU, thiotepa). The primary endpoint of the study is event-free-survival (EFS), defined as time from randomization to premature end of treatment due to any reason, lymphoma progression or death whichever occurs first. Secondary endpoints include OS, progression free survival (PFS), toxicity, neurocognitive impairment and quality of life. Minimal follow-up is 24 months. DISCUSSION: Current treatment options for PCNSL in patients ≤ 70 years have improved remarkably over recent years. However, the potential efficacy benefits are offset by an increased incidence of short-term toxicities which can impact on treatment delivery and hence on survival outcomes. In patients ≤ 70 years with newly diagnosed PCNSL addressing the need to reduce treatment-related toxicity by de-escalating and optimising the induction phase of treatment, is a potentially attractive treatment strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German clinical trials registry DRKS00022768 registered June 10(th), 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09723-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9464101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94641012022-09-12 Optimizing MATRix as remission induction in PCNSL: de-escalated induction treatment in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma Wendler, Julia Fox, Christopher P. Valk, Elke Steinheber, Cora Fricker, Heidi Isbell, Lisa K. Neumaier, Simone Okosun, Jessica Scherer, Florian Ihorst, Gabriele Cwynarski, Kate Schorb, Elisabeth Illerhaus, Gerald BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the central nervous system (PCNSL) is a rare disorder with an increasing incidence over the past decades. High-level evidence has been reported for the MATRix regimen (high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX), high-dose AraC (HD-AraC), thiotepa and rituximab) followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (HCT-ASCT) supporting this approach to be considered a standard therapy in newly diagnosed PCNSL patients ≤ 70 years. However, early treatment-related toxicities (predominantly infectious complications), occurring in up to 28% per MATRix cycle, diminish its therapeutic success. Furthermore, sensitivity to first-line treatment is an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival (OS) in PCNSL. Thus, patients achieving early partial remission (PR) after 2 cycles of MATRix might be over-treated with 4 cycles, in the context of consolidation HCT-ASCT. METHODS: This is an open-label, multicentre, randomized phase III trial with two parallel arms. 326 immunocompetent patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL will be recruited from 37 German, 1 Austrian and 12 UK sites. Additional IELSG (International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group) sites are planned. The objective is to demonstrate superiority of a de-escalated and optimised remission induction treatment strategy, followed by HCT-ASCT. Randomization (1:1) will be performed after completion of all screening procedures. Patients in Arm A (control treatment) will receive 4 cycles of MATRix. Patients in Arm B (experimental treatment) will receive a pre-phase (R/HD-MTX), followed by 2 cycles of MATRix. Patients in both arms achieving PR or better will proceed to HCT-ASCT (BCNU, thiotepa). The primary endpoint of the study is event-free-survival (EFS), defined as time from randomization to premature end of treatment due to any reason, lymphoma progression or death whichever occurs first. Secondary endpoints include OS, progression free survival (PFS), toxicity, neurocognitive impairment and quality of life. Minimal follow-up is 24 months. DISCUSSION: Current treatment options for PCNSL in patients ≤ 70 years have improved remarkably over recent years. However, the potential efficacy benefits are offset by an increased incidence of short-term toxicities which can impact on treatment delivery and hence on survival outcomes. In patients ≤ 70 years with newly diagnosed PCNSL addressing the need to reduce treatment-related toxicity by de-escalating and optimising the induction phase of treatment, is a potentially attractive treatment strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German clinical trials registry DRKS00022768 registered June 10(th), 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09723-w. BioMed Central 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9464101/ /pubmed/36088292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09723-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Wendler, Julia
Fox, Christopher P.
Valk, Elke
Steinheber, Cora
Fricker, Heidi
Isbell, Lisa K.
Neumaier, Simone
Okosun, Jessica
Scherer, Florian
Ihorst, Gabriele
Cwynarski, Kate
Schorb, Elisabeth
Illerhaus, Gerald
Optimizing MATRix as remission induction in PCNSL: de-escalated induction treatment in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma
title Optimizing MATRix as remission induction in PCNSL: de-escalated induction treatment in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma
title_full Optimizing MATRix as remission induction in PCNSL: de-escalated induction treatment in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma
title_fullStr Optimizing MATRix as remission induction in PCNSL: de-escalated induction treatment in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing MATRix as remission induction in PCNSL: de-escalated induction treatment in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma
title_short Optimizing MATRix as remission induction in PCNSL: de-escalated induction treatment in newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma
title_sort optimizing matrix as remission induction in pcnsl: de-escalated induction treatment in newly diagnosed primary cns lymphoma
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36088292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-022-09723-w
work_keys_str_mv AT wendlerjulia optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT foxchristopherp optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT valkelke optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT steinhebercora optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT frickerheidi optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT isbelllisak optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT neumaiersimone optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT okosunjessica optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT schererflorian optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT ihorstgabriele optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT cwynarskikate optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT schorbelisabeth optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma
AT illerhausgerald optimizingmatrixasremissioninductioninpcnsldeescalatedinductiontreatmentinnewlydiagnosedprimarycnslymphoma