Cargando…

Medical decision-making in hospices from the viewpoint of physicians: results from two qualitative studies

BACKGROUND: Physicians who practice in a hospice are responsible for working with patients and nursing staff to develop a medication plan, monitor symptoms and pain, and adjust medication if necessary. In inpatient hospices in Germany, physicians are part of a multi-professional approach, but not pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walker, Andreas, Breitsameter, Christof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36088376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00999-0
_version_ 1784787570616434688
author Walker, Andreas
Breitsameter, Christof
author_facet Walker, Andreas
Breitsameter, Christof
author_sort Walker, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physicians who practice in a hospice are responsible for working with patients and nursing staff to develop a medication plan, monitor symptoms and pain, and adjust medication if necessary. In inpatient hospices in Germany, physicians are part of a multi-professional approach, but not part of the hospice team itself. However, there is no, or hardly any, literature on medical practice in a hospice setting. Therefore, we wanted to know how physicians reflect upon their role in hospice within a multi-professional setting, how they communicate with patients, relatives, nursing staff and other physicians, and what the limitations of these communication processes are. METHODS: By means of two qualitative studies we explored how physicians classify their activities as part of the hospice organization. The study design followed Grounded Theory procedures. RESULTS: The physicians named an appropriate interpretation of the patient's wishes as the challenge of everyday practice which can lead to differences of perspective with those involved: with nursing staff, who would prefer an alternative form of medication, with relatives, who do not accept that the patient refuses nutrition, with other physicians, who have a different opinion about appropriate treatment. For physicians, this is all the more challenging as communication with the patient becomes increasingly uncertain due to the patient’s illness. Again and again, medical measures have to be negotiated on several levels. CONCLUSION: Multi-professional organizations that have to deal with differences in perspective handle them by clearly distinguishing areas of responsibility, an aspect that physicians also claim for themselves. For physicians the question arises repeatedly whether they have correctly interpreted the wishes of the patient. They must continuously reassure themselves of the patient's wishes and this presents them with communication challenges not only with the patient, but also with the nursing staff and relatives and, more recently, with their colleagues. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00999-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9464388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94643882022-09-12 Medical decision-making in hospices from the viewpoint of physicians: results from two qualitative studies Walker, Andreas Breitsameter, Christof BMC Palliat Care Research Article BACKGROUND: Physicians who practice in a hospice are responsible for working with patients and nursing staff to develop a medication plan, monitor symptoms and pain, and adjust medication if necessary. In inpatient hospices in Germany, physicians are part of a multi-professional approach, but not part of the hospice team itself. However, there is no, or hardly any, literature on medical practice in a hospice setting. Therefore, we wanted to know how physicians reflect upon their role in hospice within a multi-professional setting, how they communicate with patients, relatives, nursing staff and other physicians, and what the limitations of these communication processes are. METHODS: By means of two qualitative studies we explored how physicians classify their activities as part of the hospice organization. The study design followed Grounded Theory procedures. RESULTS: The physicians named an appropriate interpretation of the patient's wishes as the challenge of everyday practice which can lead to differences of perspective with those involved: with nursing staff, who would prefer an alternative form of medication, with relatives, who do not accept that the patient refuses nutrition, with other physicians, who have a different opinion about appropriate treatment. For physicians, this is all the more challenging as communication with the patient becomes increasingly uncertain due to the patient’s illness. Again and again, medical measures have to be negotiated on several levels. CONCLUSION: Multi-professional organizations that have to deal with differences in perspective handle them by clearly distinguishing areas of responsibility, an aspect that physicians also claim for themselves. For physicians the question arises repeatedly whether they have correctly interpreted the wishes of the patient. They must continuously reassure themselves of the patient's wishes and this presents them with communication challenges not only with the patient, but also with the nursing staff and relatives and, more recently, with their colleagues. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-022-00999-0. BioMed Central 2022-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9464388/ /pubmed/36088376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00999-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Walker, Andreas
Breitsameter, Christof
Medical decision-making in hospices from the viewpoint of physicians: results from two qualitative studies
title Medical decision-making in hospices from the viewpoint of physicians: results from two qualitative studies
title_full Medical decision-making in hospices from the viewpoint of physicians: results from two qualitative studies
title_fullStr Medical decision-making in hospices from the viewpoint of physicians: results from two qualitative studies
title_full_unstemmed Medical decision-making in hospices from the viewpoint of physicians: results from two qualitative studies
title_short Medical decision-making in hospices from the viewpoint of physicians: results from two qualitative studies
title_sort medical decision-making in hospices from the viewpoint of physicians: results from two qualitative studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36088376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-022-00999-0
work_keys_str_mv AT walkerandreas medicaldecisionmakinginhospicesfromtheviewpointofphysiciansresultsfromtwoqualitativestudies
AT breitsameterchristof medicaldecisionmakinginhospicesfromtheviewpointofphysiciansresultsfromtwoqualitativestudies