Cargando…
The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Background: Molecular syndromic panels can rapidly detect common pathogens responsible for acute gastroenteritis in hospitalized patients. Their impact on both patient and healthcare system outcomes is uncertain compared to conventional stool testing. This randomized trial evaluates the impact of mo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120274 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27931 |
_version_ | 1784787586056716288 |
---|---|
author | DiDiodato, Giulio Allen, Ashley Bradbury, Nellie Brown, Julia Cruise, Kelly Jedrzejko, Christopher MacDonald, Valerie Pigeon, Jessica Sturgeon, Amanda Yellenik, Daniel |
author_facet | DiDiodato, Giulio Allen, Ashley Bradbury, Nellie Brown, Julia Cruise, Kelly Jedrzejko, Christopher MacDonald, Valerie Pigeon, Jessica Sturgeon, Amanda Yellenik, Daniel |
author_sort | DiDiodato, Giulio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Molecular syndromic panels can rapidly detect common pathogens responsible for acute gastroenteritis in hospitalized patients. Their impact on both patient and healthcare system outcomes is uncertain compared to conventional stool testing. This randomized trial evaluates the impact of molecular testing on in-hospital resource utilization compared to conventional stool testing. Methods: Hospitalized patients with acute diarrheal illness were randomized 1:1 to either conventional or molecular stool testing with the BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal panel (FGP). The primary outcome was the duration of contact isolation, and secondary outcomes included other in-hospital resource utilization such as diagnostic imaging and antimicrobial use. Results: A total of 156 patients were randomized. Randomization resulted in a balanced allocation of patients across all three age strata (<18, 18-69, ≥70 years old). The proportion of positive stools was 20.5% vs 29.5% in the control and FGP groups, respectively (p=0.196). The median duration of contact isolation was 51 hours (interquartile range [iqr] 66) and 69 hours (iqr 81) in the conventional and FGP groups, respectively (p=0.0513). There were no significant differences in other in-hospital resource utilization between groups. Conclusions: There were no differences in in-hospital resource utilization observed between the FGP and conventional stool testing groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9464456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94644562022-09-15 The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial DiDiodato, Giulio Allen, Ashley Bradbury, Nellie Brown, Julia Cruise, Kelly Jedrzejko, Christopher MacDonald, Valerie Pigeon, Jessica Sturgeon, Amanda Yellenik, Daniel Cureus Infectious Disease Background: Molecular syndromic panels can rapidly detect common pathogens responsible for acute gastroenteritis in hospitalized patients. Their impact on both patient and healthcare system outcomes is uncertain compared to conventional stool testing. This randomized trial evaluates the impact of molecular testing on in-hospital resource utilization compared to conventional stool testing. Methods: Hospitalized patients with acute diarrheal illness were randomized 1:1 to either conventional or molecular stool testing with the BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal panel (FGP). The primary outcome was the duration of contact isolation, and secondary outcomes included other in-hospital resource utilization such as diagnostic imaging and antimicrobial use. Results: A total of 156 patients were randomized. Randomization resulted in a balanced allocation of patients across all three age strata (<18, 18-69, ≥70 years old). The proportion of positive stools was 20.5% vs 29.5% in the control and FGP groups, respectively (p=0.196). The median duration of contact isolation was 51 hours (interquartile range [iqr] 66) and 69 hours (iqr 81) in the conventional and FGP groups, respectively (p=0.0513). There were no significant differences in other in-hospital resource utilization between groups. Conclusions: There were no differences in in-hospital resource utilization observed between the FGP and conventional stool testing groups. Cureus 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9464456/ /pubmed/36120274 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27931 Text en Copyright © 2022, DiDiodato et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Infectious Disease DiDiodato, Giulio Allen, Ashley Bradbury, Nellie Brown, Julia Cruise, Kelly Jedrzejko, Christopher MacDonald, Valerie Pigeon, Jessica Sturgeon, Amanda Yellenik, Daniel The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | efficacy of the biofire filmarray gastrointestinal panel to reduce hospital costs associated with contact isolation: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
topic | Infectious Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120274 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT didiodatogiulio theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT allenashley theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bradburynellie theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brownjulia theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cruisekelly theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jedrzejkochristopher theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT macdonaldvalerie theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pigeonjessica theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sturgeonamanda theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yellenikdaniel theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT didiodatogiulio efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT allenashley efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bradburynellie efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brownjulia efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cruisekelly efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jedrzejkochristopher efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT macdonaldvalerie efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pigeonjessica efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sturgeonamanda efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yellenikdaniel efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial |