Cargando…

The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Molecular syndromic panels can rapidly detect common pathogens responsible for acute gastroenteritis in hospitalized patients. Their impact on both patient and healthcare system outcomes is uncertain compared to conventional stool testing. This randomized trial evaluates the impact of mo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DiDiodato, Giulio, Allen, Ashley, Bradbury, Nellie, Brown, Julia, Cruise, Kelly, Jedrzejko, Christopher, MacDonald, Valerie, Pigeon, Jessica, Sturgeon, Amanda, Yellenik, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120274
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27931
_version_ 1784787586056716288
author DiDiodato, Giulio
Allen, Ashley
Bradbury, Nellie
Brown, Julia
Cruise, Kelly
Jedrzejko, Christopher
MacDonald, Valerie
Pigeon, Jessica
Sturgeon, Amanda
Yellenik, Daniel
author_facet DiDiodato, Giulio
Allen, Ashley
Bradbury, Nellie
Brown, Julia
Cruise, Kelly
Jedrzejko, Christopher
MacDonald, Valerie
Pigeon, Jessica
Sturgeon, Amanda
Yellenik, Daniel
author_sort DiDiodato, Giulio
collection PubMed
description Background: Molecular syndromic panels can rapidly detect common pathogens responsible for acute gastroenteritis in hospitalized patients. Their impact on both patient and healthcare system outcomes is uncertain compared to conventional stool testing. This randomized trial evaluates the impact of molecular testing on in-hospital resource utilization compared to conventional stool testing. Methods: Hospitalized patients with acute diarrheal illness were randomized 1:1 to either conventional or molecular stool testing with the BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal panel (FGP). The primary outcome was the duration of contact isolation, and secondary outcomes included other in-hospital resource utilization such as diagnostic imaging and antimicrobial use. Results: A total of 156 patients were randomized. Randomization resulted in a balanced allocation of patients across all three age strata (<18, 18-69, ≥70 years old). The proportion of positive stools was 20.5% vs 29.5% in the control and FGP groups, respectively (p=0.196). The median duration of contact isolation was 51 hours (interquartile range [iqr] 66) and 69 hours (iqr 81) in the conventional and FGP groups, respectively (p=0.0513). There were no significant differences in other in-hospital resource utilization between groups. Conclusions: There were no differences in in-hospital resource utilization observed between the FGP and conventional stool testing groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9464456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94644562022-09-15 The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial DiDiodato, Giulio Allen, Ashley Bradbury, Nellie Brown, Julia Cruise, Kelly Jedrzejko, Christopher MacDonald, Valerie Pigeon, Jessica Sturgeon, Amanda Yellenik, Daniel Cureus Infectious Disease Background: Molecular syndromic panels can rapidly detect common pathogens responsible for acute gastroenteritis in hospitalized patients. Their impact on both patient and healthcare system outcomes is uncertain compared to conventional stool testing. This randomized trial evaluates the impact of molecular testing on in-hospital resource utilization compared to conventional stool testing. Methods: Hospitalized patients with acute diarrheal illness were randomized 1:1 to either conventional or molecular stool testing with the BioFire FilmArray gastrointestinal panel (FGP). The primary outcome was the duration of contact isolation, and secondary outcomes included other in-hospital resource utilization such as diagnostic imaging and antimicrobial use. Results: A total of 156 patients were randomized. Randomization resulted in a balanced allocation of patients across all three age strata (<18, 18-69, ≥70 years old). The proportion of positive stools was 20.5% vs 29.5% in the control and FGP groups, respectively (p=0.196). The median duration of contact isolation was 51 hours (interquartile range [iqr] 66) and 69 hours (iqr 81) in the conventional and FGP groups, respectively (p=0.0513). There were no significant differences in other in-hospital resource utilization between groups. Conclusions: There were no differences in in-hospital resource utilization observed between the FGP and conventional stool testing groups. Cureus 2022-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9464456/ /pubmed/36120274 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27931 Text en Copyright © 2022, DiDiodato et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Infectious Disease
DiDiodato, Giulio
Allen, Ashley
Bradbury, Nellie
Brown, Julia
Cruise, Kelly
Jedrzejko, Christopher
MacDonald, Valerie
Pigeon, Jessica
Sturgeon, Amanda
Yellenik, Daniel
The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
title The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short The Efficacy of the BioFire FilmArray Gastrointestinal Panel to Reduce Hospital Costs Associated With Contact Isolation: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort efficacy of the biofire filmarray gastrointestinal panel to reduce hospital costs associated with contact isolation: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
topic Infectious Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36120274
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27931
work_keys_str_mv AT didiodatogiulio theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT allenashley theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bradburynellie theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brownjulia theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cruisekelly theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jedrzejkochristopher theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT macdonaldvalerie theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pigeonjessica theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sturgeonamanda theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yellenikdaniel theefficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT didiodatogiulio efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT allenashley efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bradburynellie efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brownjulia efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cruisekelly efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jedrzejkochristopher efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT macdonaldvalerie efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pigeonjessica efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sturgeonamanda efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yellenikdaniel efficacyofthebiofirefilmarraygastrointestinalpaneltoreducehospitalcostsassociatedwithcontactisolationapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial