Cargando…

The impact of COVID-19 vaccines on fertility-A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Despite literature’s evidence about COVID-19 vaccines' safety, concerns have arisen regarding adverse events, including the possible impact on fertility, accentuated by misinformation and anti-vaccine campaigns. The present study aims to answer the question: Is there any impact of C...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaçe, D., La Gatta, E., Petrella, L., Di Pietro, M.L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36137903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.019
_version_ 1784787617915600896
author Zaçe, D.
La Gatta, E.
Petrella, L.
Di Pietro, M.L.
author_facet Zaçe, D.
La Gatta, E.
Petrella, L.
Di Pietro, M.L.
author_sort Zaçe, D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite literature’s evidence about COVID-19 vaccines' safety, concerns have arisen regarding adverse events, including the possible impact on fertility, accentuated by misinformation and anti-vaccine campaigns. The present study aims to answer the question: Is there any impact of COVID-19 vaccines on the fertility of men and women of reproductive age? METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase databases were searched for eligible studies until June 8th, 2022. The search was restricted to articles regarding humans, published in any languages, without additional restrictions. Studies’ quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa and the Before and After Quality Assessment scales for cohort and pre-post studies, respectively. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed for parameters considered in ≥ 2 studies, calculating means, p-values and 95 % Confidence Intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Out of 1406 studies screened, 29 were included in the systematic review. These studies, conducted in Israel (34.5 %), USA (24.1 %), Russia (20.7 %) China (10.3 %), Italy (3.5 %), North America (3.5%) and Turkey (3.5 %) were of poor (34.5 %), moderate (58.6 %) and good (6.9 %) quality. Meta-analyses were performed for pre- and post-vaccination sperm progressive motility (44 %, 95 % CI 42 %-62 % vs 43 %, 95 % CI 31 %-59 % p = 0.07) and concentration (50.6 mln/ml, 95 % CI 35.1–72.8 vs 55.4 mln/ml, 95 % CI 37.4–82.2p = 0.12). Biochemical (0.51, 95 % CI 0.40–0.66 vs 0.60, 95 % CI 0.53–0.68p = 0.45) and clinical (0.45, 95 % CI 0.37–0.54 vs 0.47, 95 % CI 0.40–0.55 p = 0.31) pregnancy rate did not differ among vaccinated and not vaccinated groups. Subgroup meta-analyses based on the type of vaccine showed no significant difference: between vaccinated with mRNA vaccines and non-vaccinated regarding biochemical pregnancy rates; pre- and post-vaccination with Gam-COVID-Vac regarding testosterone, FSH and LH levels; pre- and post-vaccination with BNT162b2 vaccines regarding sperm volumes. CONCLUSION: Based on the studies published so far, there is no scientific proof of any association between COVID-19 vaccines and fertility impairment in men or women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9464596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94645962022-09-12 The impact of COVID-19 vaccines on fertility-A systematic review and meta-analysis Zaçe, D. La Gatta, E. Petrella, L. Di Pietro, M.L. Vaccine Review BACKGROUND: Despite literature’s evidence about COVID-19 vaccines' safety, concerns have arisen regarding adverse events, including the possible impact on fertility, accentuated by misinformation and anti-vaccine campaigns. The present study aims to answer the question: Is there any impact of COVID-19 vaccines on the fertility of men and women of reproductive age? METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase databases were searched for eligible studies until June 8th, 2022. The search was restricted to articles regarding humans, published in any languages, without additional restrictions. Studies’ quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa and the Before and After Quality Assessment scales for cohort and pre-post studies, respectively. Random-effect meta-analyses were performed for parameters considered in ≥ 2 studies, calculating means, p-values and 95 % Confidence Intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Out of 1406 studies screened, 29 were included in the systematic review. These studies, conducted in Israel (34.5 %), USA (24.1 %), Russia (20.7 %) China (10.3 %), Italy (3.5 %), North America (3.5%) and Turkey (3.5 %) were of poor (34.5 %), moderate (58.6 %) and good (6.9 %) quality. Meta-analyses were performed for pre- and post-vaccination sperm progressive motility (44 %, 95 % CI 42 %-62 % vs 43 %, 95 % CI 31 %-59 % p = 0.07) and concentration (50.6 mln/ml, 95 % CI 35.1–72.8 vs 55.4 mln/ml, 95 % CI 37.4–82.2p = 0.12). Biochemical (0.51, 95 % CI 0.40–0.66 vs 0.60, 95 % CI 0.53–0.68p = 0.45) and clinical (0.45, 95 % CI 0.37–0.54 vs 0.47, 95 % CI 0.40–0.55 p = 0.31) pregnancy rate did not differ among vaccinated and not vaccinated groups. Subgroup meta-analyses based on the type of vaccine showed no significant difference: between vaccinated with mRNA vaccines and non-vaccinated regarding biochemical pregnancy rates; pre- and post-vaccination with Gam-COVID-Vac regarding testosterone, FSH and LH levels; pre- and post-vaccination with BNT162b2 vaccines regarding sperm volumes. CONCLUSION: Based on the studies published so far, there is no scientific proof of any association between COVID-19 vaccines and fertility impairment in men or women. Elsevier Ltd. 2022-10-06 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9464596/ /pubmed/36137903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.019 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Review
Zaçe, D.
La Gatta, E.
Petrella, L.
Di Pietro, M.L.
The impact of COVID-19 vaccines on fertility-A systematic review and meta-analysis
title The impact of COVID-19 vaccines on fertility-A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The impact of COVID-19 vaccines on fertility-A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The impact of COVID-19 vaccines on fertility-A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The impact of COVID-19 vaccines on fertility-A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The impact of COVID-19 vaccines on fertility-A systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort impact of covid-19 vaccines on fertility-a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36137903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.09.019
work_keys_str_mv AT zaced theimpactofcovid19vaccinesonfertilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lagattae theimpactofcovid19vaccinesonfertilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT petrellal theimpactofcovid19vaccinesonfertilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dipietroml theimpactofcovid19vaccinesonfertilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zaced impactofcovid19vaccinesonfertilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lagattae impactofcovid19vaccinesonfertilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT petrellal impactofcovid19vaccinesonfertilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dipietroml impactofcovid19vaccinesonfertilityasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis