Cargando…

COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Strategies in Light of Emerging Viral Variants: Frequency, Timing, and Target Groups

BACKGROUND: Vaccinations have reduced severe burden of COVID-19 and allowed for lifting of non-pharmaceutical interventions. However, with immunity waning alongside emergence of more transmissible variants of concern, vaccination strategies must be examined. METHODS: Here we apply a SARS-CoV-2 trans...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kelly, Sherrie L., Le Rutte, Epke A., Richter, Maximilian, Penny, Melissa A., Shattock, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36094720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00683-z
_version_ 1784787620374511616
author Kelly, Sherrie L.
Le Rutte, Epke A.
Richter, Maximilian
Penny, Melissa A.
Shattock, Andrew J.
author_facet Kelly, Sherrie L.
Le Rutte, Epke A.
Richter, Maximilian
Penny, Melissa A.
Shattock, Andrew J.
author_sort Kelly, Sherrie L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Vaccinations have reduced severe burden of COVID-19 and allowed for lifting of non-pharmaceutical interventions. However, with immunity waning alongside emergence of more transmissible variants of concern, vaccination strategies must be examined. METHODS: Here we apply a SARS-CoV-2 transmission model to identify preferred frequency, timing, and target groups for vaccine boosters to reduce public health burden and health systems risk. We estimated new infections and hospital admissions averted over 2 years through annual or biannual boosting of those eligible (those who received doses one and two) who are (1) most vulnerable (60+ or living with comorbidities) or (2) those 5+, at universal (98% of eligible) or lower coverage (85% of those 50+ or with comorbidities and 50% of 5–49 year olds) representing moderate vaccine fatigue and/or hesitancy. We simulated three emerging variant scenarios: (1) no new variants; (2) 25% more infectious and immune-evading Omicron-level severity variants emerge annually and become dominant; (3) emerge biannually. We further explored the impact of varying seasonality, variant immune-evading capacity, infectivity, severity, timing, and vaccine infection blocking assumptions. RESULTS: To reduce COVID-19-related hospitalisations over the next 2 years, boosters should be provided for all those eligible annually 3–4 months ahead of peak winter whether or not new variants of concern emerge. Only boosting those most vulnerable is unlikely to ensure reduced stress on health systems. Moreover, boosting all eligible better protects those most vulnerable than only boosting the vulnerable group. Conversely, while this strategy may not ensure reduced stress on health systems, as an indication of cost-effectiveness, per booster dose more hospitalisations could be averted through annual boosting of those most vulnerable versus all eligible, since those most vulnerable are more likely to seek hospital care once infected, whereas increasing to biannual boosting showed diminishing returns. Results were robust when key model parameters were varied. However, we found that the more frequently variants emerge, the less the effect boosters will have, regardless of whether administered annually or biannually. CONCLUSIONS: Delivering well-timed annual COVID-19 vaccine boosters to all those eligible, prioritising those most vulnerable, can reduce infections and hospital admissions. Findings provide model-based evidence for decision-makers to plan for administering COVID-19 boosters ahead of winter 2022–2023 to help mitigate the health burden and health system stress. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-022-00683-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9464609
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94646092022-09-12 COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Strategies in Light of Emerging Viral Variants: Frequency, Timing, and Target Groups Kelly, Sherrie L. Le Rutte, Epke A. Richter, Maximilian Penny, Melissa A. Shattock, Andrew J. Infect Dis Ther Original Research BACKGROUND: Vaccinations have reduced severe burden of COVID-19 and allowed for lifting of non-pharmaceutical interventions. However, with immunity waning alongside emergence of more transmissible variants of concern, vaccination strategies must be examined. METHODS: Here we apply a SARS-CoV-2 transmission model to identify preferred frequency, timing, and target groups for vaccine boosters to reduce public health burden and health systems risk. We estimated new infections and hospital admissions averted over 2 years through annual or biannual boosting of those eligible (those who received doses one and two) who are (1) most vulnerable (60+ or living with comorbidities) or (2) those 5+, at universal (98% of eligible) or lower coverage (85% of those 50+ or with comorbidities and 50% of 5–49 year olds) representing moderate vaccine fatigue and/or hesitancy. We simulated three emerging variant scenarios: (1) no new variants; (2) 25% more infectious and immune-evading Omicron-level severity variants emerge annually and become dominant; (3) emerge biannually. We further explored the impact of varying seasonality, variant immune-evading capacity, infectivity, severity, timing, and vaccine infection blocking assumptions. RESULTS: To reduce COVID-19-related hospitalisations over the next 2 years, boosters should be provided for all those eligible annually 3–4 months ahead of peak winter whether or not new variants of concern emerge. Only boosting those most vulnerable is unlikely to ensure reduced stress on health systems. Moreover, boosting all eligible better protects those most vulnerable than only boosting the vulnerable group. Conversely, while this strategy may not ensure reduced stress on health systems, as an indication of cost-effectiveness, per booster dose more hospitalisations could be averted through annual boosting of those most vulnerable versus all eligible, since those most vulnerable are more likely to seek hospital care once infected, whereas increasing to biannual boosting showed diminishing returns. Results were robust when key model parameters were varied. However, we found that the more frequently variants emerge, the less the effect boosters will have, regardless of whether administered annually or biannually. CONCLUSIONS: Delivering well-timed annual COVID-19 vaccine boosters to all those eligible, prioritising those most vulnerable, can reduce infections and hospital admissions. Findings provide model-based evidence for decision-makers to plan for administering COVID-19 boosters ahead of winter 2022–2023 to help mitigate the health burden and health system stress. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40121-022-00683-z. Springer Healthcare 2022-09-12 2022-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9464609/ /pubmed/36094720 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00683-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Kelly, Sherrie L.
Le Rutte, Epke A.
Richter, Maximilian
Penny, Melissa A.
Shattock, Andrew J.
COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Strategies in Light of Emerging Viral Variants: Frequency, Timing, and Target Groups
title COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Strategies in Light of Emerging Viral Variants: Frequency, Timing, and Target Groups
title_full COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Strategies in Light of Emerging Viral Variants: Frequency, Timing, and Target Groups
title_fullStr COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Strategies in Light of Emerging Viral Variants: Frequency, Timing, and Target Groups
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Strategies in Light of Emerging Viral Variants: Frequency, Timing, and Target Groups
title_short COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Strategies in Light of Emerging Viral Variants: Frequency, Timing, and Target Groups
title_sort covid-19 vaccine booster strategies in light of emerging viral variants: frequency, timing, and target groups
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9464609/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36094720
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-022-00683-z
work_keys_str_mv AT kellysherriel covid19vaccineboosterstrategiesinlightofemergingviralvariantsfrequencytimingandtargetgroups
AT lerutteepkea covid19vaccineboosterstrategiesinlightofemergingviralvariantsfrequencytimingandtargetgroups
AT richtermaximilian covid19vaccineboosterstrategiesinlightofemergingviralvariantsfrequencytimingandtargetgroups
AT pennymelissaa covid19vaccineboosterstrategiesinlightofemergingviralvariantsfrequencytimingandtargetgroups
AT shattockandrewj covid19vaccineboosterstrategiesinlightofemergingviralvariantsfrequencytimingandtargetgroups