Cargando…

Increased extent of waterfowl grazing lengthens the recovery time of a colonizing seagrass (Halophila ovalis) with implications for seagrass resilience

Herbivore distributions and abundance are shifting because of climate change, leading to intensified grazing pressure on foundation species such as seagrasses. This, combined with rapidly increasing magnitudes of change in estuarine ecosystems, may affect seagrass resilience. While the overall resil...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Dea, Caitlyn M., Lavery, Paul S., Webster, Chanelle L., McMahon, Kathryn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.947109
_version_ 1784787765474361344
author O’Dea, Caitlyn M.
Lavery, Paul S.
Webster, Chanelle L.
McMahon, Kathryn M.
author_facet O’Dea, Caitlyn M.
Lavery, Paul S.
Webster, Chanelle L.
McMahon, Kathryn M.
author_sort O’Dea, Caitlyn M.
collection PubMed
description Herbivore distributions and abundance are shifting because of climate change, leading to intensified grazing pressure on foundation species such as seagrasses. This, combined with rapidly increasing magnitudes of change in estuarine ecosystems, may affect seagrass resilience. While the overall resilience of seagrasses is generally well-studied, the timeframes of recovery has received comparatively little attention, particularly in temperate estuaries. We investigated how the recovery time (RT) of seagrass is affected by simulated grazing in a southwestern Australian estuary. Whilst excluding swans, we simulated different grazing intensities (25, 50, 75, and 100% removal from 1 m(2) plots) at four locations in the Swan-Canning Estuary, Western Australia during summer and tracked the recovery of seagrass over 3 months, using seagrass cover as the main measure of recovery. We found that seagrass recovered within 4–6 weeks from the lower grazing intensities (25 and 50%) and 7–19 weeks from the higher grazing intensities (75 and 100%) across the estuary. Increased grazing intensity led to not only longer recovery times (RTs), but also greater variability in the RT among experimental locations. The RT from the higher grazing intensities at one location in particular was more than double other locations. Seagrass recovery was through vegetative mechanisms and not through sexual reproduction. There was a significant grazing treatment effect on seagrass meadow characteristics, particularly belowground biomass which had not recovered 3 months following grazing. As the pressure of climate change on estuarine environments increases, these quantified RTs for seagrass provide a baseline for understanding grazing pressure as a singular disturbance. Future work can now examine how grazing and other potentially interacting pressures in our changing climate could impact seagrass recovery even further.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9465301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94653012022-09-13 Increased extent of waterfowl grazing lengthens the recovery time of a colonizing seagrass (Halophila ovalis) with implications for seagrass resilience O’Dea, Caitlyn M. Lavery, Paul S. Webster, Chanelle L. McMahon, Kathryn M. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Herbivore distributions and abundance are shifting because of climate change, leading to intensified grazing pressure on foundation species such as seagrasses. This, combined with rapidly increasing magnitudes of change in estuarine ecosystems, may affect seagrass resilience. While the overall resilience of seagrasses is generally well-studied, the timeframes of recovery has received comparatively little attention, particularly in temperate estuaries. We investigated how the recovery time (RT) of seagrass is affected by simulated grazing in a southwestern Australian estuary. Whilst excluding swans, we simulated different grazing intensities (25, 50, 75, and 100% removal from 1 m(2) plots) at four locations in the Swan-Canning Estuary, Western Australia during summer and tracked the recovery of seagrass over 3 months, using seagrass cover as the main measure of recovery. We found that seagrass recovered within 4–6 weeks from the lower grazing intensities (25 and 50%) and 7–19 weeks from the higher grazing intensities (75 and 100%) across the estuary. Increased grazing intensity led to not only longer recovery times (RTs), but also greater variability in the RT among experimental locations. The RT from the higher grazing intensities at one location in particular was more than double other locations. Seagrass recovery was through vegetative mechanisms and not through sexual reproduction. There was a significant grazing treatment effect on seagrass meadow characteristics, particularly belowground biomass which had not recovered 3 months following grazing. As the pressure of climate change on estuarine environments increases, these quantified RTs for seagrass provide a baseline for understanding grazing pressure as a singular disturbance. Future work can now examine how grazing and other potentially interacting pressures in our changing climate could impact seagrass recovery even further. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9465301/ /pubmed/36105704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.947109 Text en Copyright © 2022 O’Dea, Lavery, Webster and McMahon. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
O’Dea, Caitlyn M.
Lavery, Paul S.
Webster, Chanelle L.
McMahon, Kathryn M.
Increased extent of waterfowl grazing lengthens the recovery time of a colonizing seagrass (Halophila ovalis) with implications for seagrass resilience
title Increased extent of waterfowl grazing lengthens the recovery time of a colonizing seagrass (Halophila ovalis) with implications for seagrass resilience
title_full Increased extent of waterfowl grazing lengthens the recovery time of a colonizing seagrass (Halophila ovalis) with implications for seagrass resilience
title_fullStr Increased extent of waterfowl grazing lengthens the recovery time of a colonizing seagrass (Halophila ovalis) with implications for seagrass resilience
title_full_unstemmed Increased extent of waterfowl grazing lengthens the recovery time of a colonizing seagrass (Halophila ovalis) with implications for seagrass resilience
title_short Increased extent of waterfowl grazing lengthens the recovery time of a colonizing seagrass (Halophila ovalis) with implications for seagrass resilience
title_sort increased extent of waterfowl grazing lengthens the recovery time of a colonizing seagrass (halophila ovalis) with implications for seagrass resilience
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105704
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.947109
work_keys_str_mv AT odeacaitlynm increasedextentofwaterfowlgrazinglengthenstherecoverytimeofacolonizingseagrasshalophilaovaliswithimplicationsforseagrassresilience
AT laverypauls increasedextentofwaterfowlgrazinglengthenstherecoverytimeofacolonizingseagrasshalophilaovaliswithimplicationsforseagrassresilience
AT websterchanellel increasedextentofwaterfowlgrazinglengthenstherecoverytimeofacolonizingseagrasshalophilaovaliswithimplicationsforseagrassresilience
AT mcmahonkathrynm increasedextentofwaterfowlgrazinglengthenstherecoverytimeofacolonizingseagrasshalophilaovaliswithimplicationsforseagrassresilience