Cargando…

Agronomic evaluation of shade tolerance of 16 spring Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz genotypes under different artificial shade levels using a modified membership function

Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] is currently gaining considerable attention as a potential oilseed feedstock for biofuel, oil and feed source, and bioproducts. Studies have shown the potential of using camelina in an intercropping system. However, there are no camelina genotypes evaluated or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Yawen, Yu, Jialin, Gao, Yang, Li, Zhiwei, Kim, Do-Soon, Chen, Min, Fan, Yi, Zhang, Haixi, Yan, Xuebing, Zhang, Chuan-Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.978932
_version_ 1784787772497723392
author Wang, Yawen
Yu, Jialin
Gao, Yang
Li, Zhiwei
Kim, Do-Soon
Chen, Min
Fan, Yi
Zhang, Haixi
Yan, Xuebing
Zhang, Chuan-Jie
author_facet Wang, Yawen
Yu, Jialin
Gao, Yang
Li, Zhiwei
Kim, Do-Soon
Chen, Min
Fan, Yi
Zhang, Haixi
Yan, Xuebing
Zhang, Chuan-Jie
author_sort Wang, Yawen
collection PubMed
description Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] is currently gaining considerable attention as a potential oilseed feedstock for biofuel, oil and feed source, and bioproducts. Studies have shown the potential of using camelina in an intercropping system. However, there are no camelina genotypes evaluated or bred for shade tolerance. The objective of this study was to evaluate and determine the shade tolerance of sixteen spring camelina genotypes (growth stage: BBCH 103; the plants with 4–5 leaves) for intercropping systems. In this study, we simulated three different shade levels, including low (LST), medium (MST), and high shade treatments (HST; 15, 25, and 50% reduction of natural light intensity, respectively), and evaluated the photosynthetic and physiological parameters, seed production, and seed quality. The mean chlorophyll pigments, including the total chlorophyll and chlorophyll a and b across the 16 genotypes increased as shade level increased, while the chlorophyll fluorescence parameter F(v)/F(m), chlorophyll a/b, leaf area, the number of silicles and branches plant(−1) decreased as shade level increased. The first day of anthesis and days of flowering duration of camelina treated with shade were significantly delayed and shortened, respectively, as shade increased. The shortened lifecycle and altered flowering phenology decreased camelina seed yield. Additionally, the shade under MST and HST reduced the seed oil content and unsaturated fatty acids, but not saturated fatty acids. The dendrograms constructed using the comprehensive tolerance membership values revealed that CamK9, CamC4, and ‘SO-40’ were the relatively shade-tolerant genotypes among the 16 camelina genotypes. These camelina genotypes can grow under the shade level up to a 25% reduction in natural light intensity producing a similar seed yield and seed oil quality, indicating the potential to intercrop with maize or other small grain crops. The present study provided the baseline information on the response of camelina genotypes to different shade levels, which would help in selecting or breeding shade-tolerant genotypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9465330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94653302022-09-13 Agronomic evaluation of shade tolerance of 16 spring Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz genotypes under different artificial shade levels using a modified membership function Wang, Yawen Yu, Jialin Gao, Yang Li, Zhiwei Kim, Do-Soon Chen, Min Fan, Yi Zhang, Haixi Yan, Xuebing Zhang, Chuan-Jie Front Plant Sci Plant Science Camelina [Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz] is currently gaining considerable attention as a potential oilseed feedstock for biofuel, oil and feed source, and bioproducts. Studies have shown the potential of using camelina in an intercropping system. However, there are no camelina genotypes evaluated or bred for shade tolerance. The objective of this study was to evaluate and determine the shade tolerance of sixteen spring camelina genotypes (growth stage: BBCH 103; the plants with 4–5 leaves) for intercropping systems. In this study, we simulated three different shade levels, including low (LST), medium (MST), and high shade treatments (HST; 15, 25, and 50% reduction of natural light intensity, respectively), and evaluated the photosynthetic and physiological parameters, seed production, and seed quality. The mean chlorophyll pigments, including the total chlorophyll and chlorophyll a and b across the 16 genotypes increased as shade level increased, while the chlorophyll fluorescence parameter F(v)/F(m), chlorophyll a/b, leaf area, the number of silicles and branches plant(−1) decreased as shade level increased. The first day of anthesis and days of flowering duration of camelina treated with shade were significantly delayed and shortened, respectively, as shade increased. The shortened lifecycle and altered flowering phenology decreased camelina seed yield. Additionally, the shade under MST and HST reduced the seed oil content and unsaturated fatty acids, but not saturated fatty acids. The dendrograms constructed using the comprehensive tolerance membership values revealed that CamK9, CamC4, and ‘SO-40’ were the relatively shade-tolerant genotypes among the 16 camelina genotypes. These camelina genotypes can grow under the shade level up to a 25% reduction in natural light intensity producing a similar seed yield and seed oil quality, indicating the potential to intercrop with maize or other small grain crops. The present study provided the baseline information on the response of camelina genotypes to different shade levels, which would help in selecting or breeding shade-tolerant genotypes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9465330/ /pubmed/36105697 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.978932 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Yu, Gao, Li, Kim, Chen, Fan, Zhang, Yan and Zhang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Wang, Yawen
Yu, Jialin
Gao, Yang
Li, Zhiwei
Kim, Do-Soon
Chen, Min
Fan, Yi
Zhang, Haixi
Yan, Xuebing
Zhang, Chuan-Jie
Agronomic evaluation of shade tolerance of 16 spring Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz genotypes under different artificial shade levels using a modified membership function
title Agronomic evaluation of shade tolerance of 16 spring Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz genotypes under different artificial shade levels using a modified membership function
title_full Agronomic evaluation of shade tolerance of 16 spring Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz genotypes under different artificial shade levels using a modified membership function
title_fullStr Agronomic evaluation of shade tolerance of 16 spring Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz genotypes under different artificial shade levels using a modified membership function
title_full_unstemmed Agronomic evaluation of shade tolerance of 16 spring Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz genotypes under different artificial shade levels using a modified membership function
title_short Agronomic evaluation of shade tolerance of 16 spring Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz genotypes under different artificial shade levels using a modified membership function
title_sort agronomic evaluation of shade tolerance of 16 spring camelina sativa (l.) crantz genotypes under different artificial shade levels using a modified membership function
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105697
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.978932
work_keys_str_mv AT wangyawen agronomicevaluationofshadetoleranceof16springcamelinasativalcrantzgenotypesunderdifferentartificialshadelevelsusingamodifiedmembershipfunction
AT yujialin agronomicevaluationofshadetoleranceof16springcamelinasativalcrantzgenotypesunderdifferentartificialshadelevelsusingamodifiedmembershipfunction
AT gaoyang agronomicevaluationofshadetoleranceof16springcamelinasativalcrantzgenotypesunderdifferentartificialshadelevelsusingamodifiedmembershipfunction
AT lizhiwei agronomicevaluationofshadetoleranceof16springcamelinasativalcrantzgenotypesunderdifferentartificialshadelevelsusingamodifiedmembershipfunction
AT kimdosoon agronomicevaluationofshadetoleranceof16springcamelinasativalcrantzgenotypesunderdifferentartificialshadelevelsusingamodifiedmembershipfunction
AT chenmin agronomicevaluationofshadetoleranceof16springcamelinasativalcrantzgenotypesunderdifferentartificialshadelevelsusingamodifiedmembershipfunction
AT fanyi agronomicevaluationofshadetoleranceof16springcamelinasativalcrantzgenotypesunderdifferentartificialshadelevelsusingamodifiedmembershipfunction
AT zhanghaixi agronomicevaluationofshadetoleranceof16springcamelinasativalcrantzgenotypesunderdifferentartificialshadelevelsusingamodifiedmembershipfunction
AT yanxuebing agronomicevaluationofshadetoleranceof16springcamelinasativalcrantzgenotypesunderdifferentartificialshadelevelsusingamodifiedmembershipfunction
AT zhangchuanjie agronomicevaluationofshadetoleranceof16springcamelinasativalcrantzgenotypesunderdifferentartificialshadelevelsusingamodifiedmembershipfunction