Cargando…

Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects

Women use power in more prosocial ways than men and they also engage in more emotional labor (i.e., self-regulate their emotions to respond and attend to the needs and emotions of other people in a way that advances organizational goals). However, these two constructs have not been previously connec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vial, Andrea C., Cowgill, Colleen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849566
_version_ 1784787772800761856
author Vial, Andrea C.
Cowgill, Colleen M.
author_facet Vial, Andrea C.
Cowgill, Colleen M.
author_sort Vial, Andrea C.
collection PubMed
description Women use power in more prosocial ways than men and they also engage in more emotional labor (i.e., self-regulate their emotions to respond and attend to the needs and emotions of other people in a way that advances organizational goals). However, these two constructs have not been previously connected. We propose that gendered emotional labor practices and pressures result in gender differences in the prosocial use of power. We integrate the literature on emotional labor with research on the psychology of power to articulate three routes through which this happens. First, women may be more adept than men at the intrapersonal and interpersonal processes entailed in emotional labor practices—a skill that they can apply at all hierarchical levels. Second, given women’s stronger internal motivation to perform emotional labor, they construe power in a more interdependent manner than men, which promotes a more prosocial use of power. As a result, female powerholders tend to behave in more prosocial ways. Third, when they have power, women encounter stronger external motivation to engage in emotional labor, which effectively constrains powerful women’s behaviors in a way that fosters a more prosocial use of power. We discuss how, by promoting prosocial behavior among powerholders, emotional labor can be beneficial for subordinates and organizations (e.g., increase employee well-being and organizational trust), while simultaneously creating costs for individual powerholders, which may reduce women’s likelihood of actually attaining and retaining power by (a) making high-power roles less appealing, (b) guiding women toward less prestigious and (c) more precarious leadership roles, (d) draining powerful women’s time and resources without equitable rewards, and (e) making it difficult for women to legitimize their power in the eyes of subordinates (especially men). Thus, emotional labor practices can help explain the underrepresentation of women in top leadership positions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9465331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94653312022-09-13 Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects Vial, Andrea C. Cowgill, Colleen M. Front Psychol Psychology Women use power in more prosocial ways than men and they also engage in more emotional labor (i.e., self-regulate their emotions to respond and attend to the needs and emotions of other people in a way that advances organizational goals). However, these two constructs have not been previously connected. We propose that gendered emotional labor practices and pressures result in gender differences in the prosocial use of power. We integrate the literature on emotional labor with research on the psychology of power to articulate three routes through which this happens. First, women may be more adept than men at the intrapersonal and interpersonal processes entailed in emotional labor practices—a skill that they can apply at all hierarchical levels. Second, given women’s stronger internal motivation to perform emotional labor, they construe power in a more interdependent manner than men, which promotes a more prosocial use of power. As a result, female powerholders tend to behave in more prosocial ways. Third, when they have power, women encounter stronger external motivation to engage in emotional labor, which effectively constrains powerful women’s behaviors in a way that fosters a more prosocial use of power. We discuss how, by promoting prosocial behavior among powerholders, emotional labor can be beneficial for subordinates and organizations (e.g., increase employee well-being and organizational trust), while simultaneously creating costs for individual powerholders, which may reduce women’s likelihood of actually attaining and retaining power by (a) making high-power roles less appealing, (b) guiding women toward less prestigious and (c) more precarious leadership roles, (d) draining powerful women’s time and resources without equitable rewards, and (e) making it difficult for women to legitimize their power in the eyes of subordinates (especially men). Thus, emotional labor practices can help explain the underrepresentation of women in top leadership positions. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9465331/ /pubmed/36106035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849566 Text en Copyright © 2022 Vial and Cowgill. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Vial, Andrea C.
Cowgill, Colleen M.
Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects
title Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects
title_full Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects
title_fullStr Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects
title_full_unstemmed Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects
title_short Heavier Lies Her Crown: Gendered Patterns of Leader Emotional Labor and Their Downstream Effects
title_sort heavier lies her crown: gendered patterns of leader emotional labor and their downstream effects
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.849566
work_keys_str_mv AT vialandreac heavierlieshercrowngenderedpatternsofleaderemotionallaborandtheirdownstreameffects
AT cowgillcolleenm heavierlieshercrowngenderedpatternsofleaderemotionallaborandtheirdownstreameffects