Cargando…
Removal of arsenic in groundwater from western Anatolia, Turkey using an electrocoagulation reactor with different types of iron anodes
Electrocoagulation (EC) is a significantly efficient method for As removal from waters and received considerable attention recently. In this study, the natural groundwater (GW) samples containing As concentrations of GW-1: 538.8 μg L(−1), GW-2: 1132.1 μg L(−1), and GW-3: 52, 000 μg L(−1) were obtain...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10489 |
_version_ | 1784787778821685248 |
---|---|
author | Kobya, Mehmet Dolaz, Mustafa Özaydın-Şenol, Burcu Goren, Aysegul Yagmur |
author_facet | Kobya, Mehmet Dolaz, Mustafa Özaydın-Şenol, Burcu Goren, Aysegul Yagmur |
author_sort | Kobya, Mehmet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Electrocoagulation (EC) is a significantly efficient method for As removal from waters and received considerable attention recently. In this study, the natural groundwater (GW) samples containing As concentrations of GW-1: 538.8 μg L(−1), GW-2: 1132.1 μg L(−1), and GW-3: 52, 000 μg L(−1) were obtained from different provinces and treated by EC process using different iron anodes (plate, ball, and scrap). To achieve drinking water As standard (10 μg L(−1)), the operational time, applied current, and As removal optimization for all anode types were studied. At applied current of 0.025 A, the As removal efficiency, EC time, and operating cost were >99.9%, 180 min and 0.406 $ m(−3) for ball anodes, >99.9%, 100 min and 0.0813 $ m(−3) for plate anodes, >99.9%, 80 min and 0.0815 $ m(−3) for scrap anodes for GW-3, respectively. It was observed that as the As concentration in the GW increased, the EC time and operating cost increased. Overall, it was concluded that Fe scrap anodes are more advantageous than other types of anodes in terms of operating cost in EC reactor for As removal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9465359 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94653592022-09-13 Removal of arsenic in groundwater from western Anatolia, Turkey using an electrocoagulation reactor with different types of iron anodes Kobya, Mehmet Dolaz, Mustafa Özaydın-Şenol, Burcu Goren, Aysegul Yagmur Heliyon Research Article Electrocoagulation (EC) is a significantly efficient method for As removal from waters and received considerable attention recently. In this study, the natural groundwater (GW) samples containing As concentrations of GW-1: 538.8 μg L(−1), GW-2: 1132.1 μg L(−1), and GW-3: 52, 000 μg L(−1) were obtained from different provinces and treated by EC process using different iron anodes (plate, ball, and scrap). To achieve drinking water As standard (10 μg L(−1)), the operational time, applied current, and As removal optimization for all anode types were studied. At applied current of 0.025 A, the As removal efficiency, EC time, and operating cost were >99.9%, 180 min and 0.406 $ m(−3) for ball anodes, >99.9%, 100 min and 0.0813 $ m(−3) for plate anodes, >99.9%, 80 min and 0.0815 $ m(−3) for scrap anodes for GW-3, respectively. It was observed that as the As concentration in the GW increased, the EC time and operating cost increased. Overall, it was concluded that Fe scrap anodes are more advantageous than other types of anodes in terms of operating cost in EC reactor for As removal. Elsevier 2022-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9465359/ /pubmed/36105457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10489 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kobya, Mehmet Dolaz, Mustafa Özaydın-Şenol, Burcu Goren, Aysegul Yagmur Removal of arsenic in groundwater from western Anatolia, Turkey using an electrocoagulation reactor with different types of iron anodes |
title | Removal of arsenic in groundwater from western Anatolia, Turkey using an electrocoagulation reactor with different types of iron anodes |
title_full | Removal of arsenic in groundwater from western Anatolia, Turkey using an electrocoagulation reactor with different types of iron anodes |
title_fullStr | Removal of arsenic in groundwater from western Anatolia, Turkey using an electrocoagulation reactor with different types of iron anodes |
title_full_unstemmed | Removal of arsenic in groundwater from western Anatolia, Turkey using an electrocoagulation reactor with different types of iron anodes |
title_short | Removal of arsenic in groundwater from western Anatolia, Turkey using an electrocoagulation reactor with different types of iron anodes |
title_sort | removal of arsenic in groundwater from western anatolia, turkey using an electrocoagulation reactor with different types of iron anodes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465359/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10489 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kobyamehmet removalofarsenicingroundwaterfromwesternanatoliaturkeyusinganelectrocoagulationreactorwithdifferenttypesofironanodes AT dolazmustafa removalofarsenicingroundwaterfromwesternanatoliaturkeyusinganelectrocoagulationreactorwithdifferenttypesofironanodes AT ozaydınsenolburcu removalofarsenicingroundwaterfromwesternanatoliaturkeyusinganelectrocoagulationreactorwithdifferenttypesofironanodes AT gorenaysegulyagmur removalofarsenicingroundwaterfromwesternanatoliaturkeyusinganelectrocoagulationreactorwithdifferenttypesofironanodes |