Cargando…

What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning (DL) provides high sensitivity for detecting and identifying errors in pre-treatment radiotherapy quality assurance (QA). This work’s objective was to systematically evaluate the impact of different dose comparison and image preprocessing methods on DL model per...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolfs, Cecile J.A., Verhaegen, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.08.007
_version_ 1784787796000505856
author Wolfs, Cecile J.A.
Verhaegen, Frank
author_facet Wolfs, Cecile J.A.
Verhaegen, Frank
author_sort Wolfs, Cecile J.A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning (DL) provides high sensitivity for detecting and identifying errors in pre-treatment radiotherapy quality assurance (QA). This work’s objective was to systematically evaluate the impact of different dose comparison and image preprocessing methods on DL model performance for error identification in pre-treatment QA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 53 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 69 stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans of lung cancer patients, mechanical errors were simulated (MLC leaf positions, monitor unit scaling, collimator rotation). Two classification levels were assessed: error type (Level 1) and error magnitude (Level 2). Portal dose images with and without errors were compared using standard (gamma analysis), simple (absolute/relative dose difference, ratio) and alternative (distance-to-agreement, structural similarity index, gradient) dose comparison methods. For preprocessing, different normalization methods (min/max and mean/standard deviation) and image resolutions (32 × 32, 64 × 64 and 128 × 128) were evaluated. All possible combinations of classification level, dose comparison, normalization method and image size resulted in 144 input datasets for DL networks for error identification. RESULTS: Average accuracy was highest for simple dose comparison methods (Level 1: 97.7%, Level 2: 78.1%) while alternative methods scored lowest (Level 1: 91.6%, Level 2: 71.2%). Mean/stdev normalization particularly improved Level 2 classification. Higher image resolution improved error identification, although for SBRT lower image resolution was also sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of dose comparison method has the largest impact on error identification for pre-treatment QA using DL, compared to image preprocessing. Model performance can improve by using simple dose comparison methods, mean/stdev normalization and high image resolution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9465434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94654342022-09-13 What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy? Wolfs, Cecile J.A. Verhaegen, Frank Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning (DL) provides high sensitivity for detecting and identifying errors in pre-treatment radiotherapy quality assurance (QA). This work’s objective was to systematically evaluate the impact of different dose comparison and image preprocessing methods on DL model performance for error identification in pre-treatment QA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 53 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 69 stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans of lung cancer patients, mechanical errors were simulated (MLC leaf positions, monitor unit scaling, collimator rotation). Two classification levels were assessed: error type (Level 1) and error magnitude (Level 2). Portal dose images with and without errors were compared using standard (gamma analysis), simple (absolute/relative dose difference, ratio) and alternative (distance-to-agreement, structural similarity index, gradient) dose comparison methods. For preprocessing, different normalization methods (min/max and mean/standard deviation) and image resolutions (32 × 32, 64 × 64 and 128 × 128) were evaluated. All possible combinations of classification level, dose comparison, normalization method and image size resulted in 144 input datasets for DL networks for error identification. RESULTS: Average accuracy was highest for simple dose comparison methods (Level 1: 97.7%, Level 2: 78.1%) while alternative methods scored lowest (Level 1: 91.6%, Level 2: 71.2%). Mean/stdev normalization particularly improved Level 2 classification. Higher image resolution improved error identification, although for SBRT lower image resolution was also sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of dose comparison method has the largest impact on error identification for pre-treatment QA using DL, compared to image preprocessing. Model performance can improve by using simple dose comparison methods, mean/stdev normalization and high image resolution. Elsevier 2022-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9465434/ /pubmed/36106060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.08.007 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Wolfs, Cecile J.A.
Verhaegen, Frank
What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy?
title What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy?
title_full What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy?
title_fullStr What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy?
title_full_unstemmed What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy?
title_short What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy?
title_sort what is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy?
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.08.007
work_keys_str_mv AT wolfscecileja whatistheoptimalinputinformationfordeeplearningbasedpretreatmenterroridentificationinradiotherapy
AT verhaegenfrank whatistheoptimalinputinformationfordeeplearningbasedpretreatmenterroridentificationinradiotherapy