Cargando…
What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy?
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning (DL) provides high sensitivity for detecting and identifying errors in pre-treatment radiotherapy quality assurance (QA). This work’s objective was to systematically evaluate the impact of different dose comparison and image preprocessing methods on DL model per...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.08.007 |
_version_ | 1784787796000505856 |
---|---|
author | Wolfs, Cecile J.A. Verhaegen, Frank |
author_facet | Wolfs, Cecile J.A. Verhaegen, Frank |
author_sort | Wolfs, Cecile J.A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning (DL) provides high sensitivity for detecting and identifying errors in pre-treatment radiotherapy quality assurance (QA). This work’s objective was to systematically evaluate the impact of different dose comparison and image preprocessing methods on DL model performance for error identification in pre-treatment QA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 53 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 69 stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans of lung cancer patients, mechanical errors were simulated (MLC leaf positions, monitor unit scaling, collimator rotation). Two classification levels were assessed: error type (Level 1) and error magnitude (Level 2). Portal dose images with and without errors were compared using standard (gamma analysis), simple (absolute/relative dose difference, ratio) and alternative (distance-to-agreement, structural similarity index, gradient) dose comparison methods. For preprocessing, different normalization methods (min/max and mean/standard deviation) and image resolutions (32 × 32, 64 × 64 and 128 × 128) were evaluated. All possible combinations of classification level, dose comparison, normalization method and image size resulted in 144 input datasets for DL networks for error identification. RESULTS: Average accuracy was highest for simple dose comparison methods (Level 1: 97.7%, Level 2: 78.1%) while alternative methods scored lowest (Level 1: 91.6%, Level 2: 71.2%). Mean/stdev normalization particularly improved Level 2 classification. Higher image resolution improved error identification, although for SBRT lower image resolution was also sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of dose comparison method has the largest impact on error identification for pre-treatment QA using DL, compared to image preprocessing. Model performance can improve by using simple dose comparison methods, mean/stdev normalization and high image resolution. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9465434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94654342022-09-13 What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy? Wolfs, Cecile J.A. Verhaegen, Frank Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Deep learning (DL) provides high sensitivity for detecting and identifying errors in pre-treatment radiotherapy quality assurance (QA). This work’s objective was to systematically evaluate the impact of different dose comparison and image preprocessing methods on DL model performance for error identification in pre-treatment QA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For 53 volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and 69 stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment plans of lung cancer patients, mechanical errors were simulated (MLC leaf positions, monitor unit scaling, collimator rotation). Two classification levels were assessed: error type (Level 1) and error magnitude (Level 2). Portal dose images with and without errors were compared using standard (gamma analysis), simple (absolute/relative dose difference, ratio) and alternative (distance-to-agreement, structural similarity index, gradient) dose comparison methods. For preprocessing, different normalization methods (min/max and mean/standard deviation) and image resolutions (32 × 32, 64 × 64 and 128 × 128) were evaluated. All possible combinations of classification level, dose comparison, normalization method and image size resulted in 144 input datasets for DL networks for error identification. RESULTS: Average accuracy was highest for simple dose comparison methods (Level 1: 97.7%, Level 2: 78.1%) while alternative methods scored lowest (Level 1: 91.6%, Level 2: 71.2%). Mean/stdev normalization particularly improved Level 2 classification. Higher image resolution improved error identification, although for SBRT lower image resolution was also sufficient. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of dose comparison method has the largest impact on error identification for pre-treatment QA using DL, compared to image preprocessing. Model performance can improve by using simple dose comparison methods, mean/stdev normalization and high image resolution. Elsevier 2022-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9465434/ /pubmed/36106060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.08.007 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Wolfs, Cecile J.A. Verhaegen, Frank What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy? |
title | What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy? |
title_full | What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy? |
title_fullStr | What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy? |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy? |
title_short | What is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy? |
title_sort | what is the optimal input information for deep learning-based pre-treatment error identification in radiotherapy? |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36106060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2022.08.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wolfscecileja whatistheoptimalinputinformationfordeeplearningbasedpretreatmenterroridentificationinradiotherapy AT verhaegenfrank whatistheoptimalinputinformationfordeeplearningbasedpretreatmenterroridentificationinradiotherapy |