Cargando…

Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool to improve and speed up motor rehabilitation after stroke, but inconsistent clinical effects refrain tDCS from clinical implementation. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the need for individualized tDCS configurations in stroke,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Cruijsen, Joris, Dooren, Renée F., Schouten, Alfred C., Oostendorp, Thom F., Frens, Maarten A., Ribbers, Gerard M., van der Helm, Frans C.T., Kwakkel, Gert, Selles, Ruud W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36084558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103178
_version_ 1784787796236435456
author van der Cruijsen, Joris
Dooren, Renée F.
Schouten, Alfred C.
Oostendorp, Thom F.
Frens, Maarten A.
Ribbers, Gerard M.
van der Helm, Frans C.T.
Kwakkel, Gert
Selles, Ruud W.
author_facet van der Cruijsen, Joris
Dooren, Renée F.
Schouten, Alfred C.
Oostendorp, Thom F.
Frens, Maarten A.
Ribbers, Gerard M.
van der Helm, Frans C.T.
Kwakkel, Gert
Selles, Ruud W.
author_sort van der Cruijsen, Joris
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool to improve and speed up motor rehabilitation after stroke, but inconsistent clinical effects refrain tDCS from clinical implementation. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the need for individualized tDCS configurations in stroke, considering interindividual variability in brain anatomy and motor function representation. We simulated tDCS in individualized MRI-based finite element head models of 21 chronic stroke subjects and 10 healthy age-matched controls. An anatomy-based stimulation target, i.e. the motor hand knob, was identified with MRI, whereas a motor function-based stimulation target was identified with EEG. For each subject, we simulated conventional anodal tDCS electrode configurations and optimized electrode configurations to maximize stimulation strength within the anatomical and functional target. The normal component of the electric field was extracted and compared between subjects with stroke and healthy, age-matched controls, for both targets, during conventional and optimized tDCS. Electrical field strength was significantly lower, more variable and more frequently in opposite polarity for subjects with stroke compared to healthy age-matched subjects, both for the anatomical and functional target with conventional, i.e. non-individualized, electrode configurations. Optimized, i.e. individualized, electrode configurations increased the electrical field strength in the anatomical and functional target for subjects with stroke but did not reach the same levels as in healthy subjects. Considering individual brain structure and motor function is crucial for applying tDCS in subjects with stroke. Lack of individualized tDCS configurations in subjects with stroke results in lower electric fields in stimulation targets, which may partially explain the inconsistent clinical effects of tDCS in stroke trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9465435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94654352022-09-13 Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment van der Cruijsen, Joris Dooren, Renée F. Schouten, Alfred C. Oostendorp, Thom F. Frens, Maarten A. Ribbers, Gerard M. van der Helm, Frans C.T. Kwakkel, Gert Selles, Ruud W. Neuroimage Clin Regular Article Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool to improve and speed up motor rehabilitation after stroke, but inconsistent clinical effects refrain tDCS from clinical implementation. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the need for individualized tDCS configurations in stroke, considering interindividual variability in brain anatomy and motor function representation. We simulated tDCS in individualized MRI-based finite element head models of 21 chronic stroke subjects and 10 healthy age-matched controls. An anatomy-based stimulation target, i.e. the motor hand knob, was identified with MRI, whereas a motor function-based stimulation target was identified with EEG. For each subject, we simulated conventional anodal tDCS electrode configurations and optimized electrode configurations to maximize stimulation strength within the anatomical and functional target. The normal component of the electric field was extracted and compared between subjects with stroke and healthy, age-matched controls, for both targets, during conventional and optimized tDCS. Electrical field strength was significantly lower, more variable and more frequently in opposite polarity for subjects with stroke compared to healthy age-matched subjects, both for the anatomical and functional target with conventional, i.e. non-individualized, electrode configurations. Optimized, i.e. individualized, electrode configurations increased the electrical field strength in the anatomical and functional target for subjects with stroke but did not reach the same levels as in healthy subjects. Considering individual brain structure and motor function is crucial for applying tDCS in subjects with stroke. Lack of individualized tDCS configurations in subjects with stroke results in lower electric fields in stimulation targets, which may partially explain the inconsistent clinical effects of tDCS in stroke trials. Elsevier 2022-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9465435/ /pubmed/36084558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103178 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
van der Cruijsen, Joris
Dooren, Renée F.
Schouten, Alfred C.
Oostendorp, Thom F.
Frens, Maarten A.
Ribbers, Gerard M.
van der Helm, Frans C.T.
Kwakkel, Gert
Selles, Ruud W.
Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment
title Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment
title_full Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment
title_fullStr Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment
title_full_unstemmed Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment
title_short Addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tDCS by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: Implications for treatment
title_sort addressing the inconsistent electric fields of tdcs by using patient-tailored configurations in chronic stroke: implications for treatment
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36084558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103178
work_keys_str_mv AT vandercruijsenjoris addressingtheinconsistentelectricfieldsoftdcsbyusingpatienttailoredconfigurationsinchronicstrokeimplicationsfortreatment
AT doorenreneef addressingtheinconsistentelectricfieldsoftdcsbyusingpatienttailoredconfigurationsinchronicstrokeimplicationsfortreatment
AT schoutenalfredc addressingtheinconsistentelectricfieldsoftdcsbyusingpatienttailoredconfigurationsinchronicstrokeimplicationsfortreatment
AT oostendorpthomf addressingtheinconsistentelectricfieldsoftdcsbyusingpatienttailoredconfigurationsinchronicstrokeimplicationsfortreatment
AT frensmaartena addressingtheinconsistentelectricfieldsoftdcsbyusingpatienttailoredconfigurationsinchronicstrokeimplicationsfortreatment
AT ribbersgerardm addressingtheinconsistentelectricfieldsoftdcsbyusingpatienttailoredconfigurationsinchronicstrokeimplicationsfortreatment
AT vanderhelmfransct addressingtheinconsistentelectricfieldsoftdcsbyusingpatienttailoredconfigurationsinchronicstrokeimplicationsfortreatment
AT kwakkelgert addressingtheinconsistentelectricfieldsoftdcsbyusingpatienttailoredconfigurationsinchronicstrokeimplicationsfortreatment
AT sellesruudw addressingtheinconsistentelectricfieldsoftdcsbyusingpatienttailoredconfigurationsinchronicstrokeimplicationsfortreatment
AT addressingtheinconsistentelectricfieldsoftdcsbyusingpatienttailoredconfigurationsinchronicstrokeimplicationsfortreatment