Cargando…
COVID-19 and beyond – changes to provision of maternity care and future plans in Victorian maternity services
BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid service changes were made to maternity care provision in Victorian maternity services. From March 2020 many routine face-to-face visits in pregnancy were replaced by telehealth (telephone or video), along with changes to routine screening. Many provide...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465461/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.07.098 |
_version_ | 1784787802385285120 |
---|---|
author | Forster, Della Matthews, Ms Robyn Hyde, Ms Rebecca |
author_facet | Forster, Della Matthews, Ms Robyn Hyde, Ms Rebecca |
author_sort | Forster, Della |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid service changes were made to maternity care provision in Victorian maternity services. From March 2020 many routine face-to-face visits in pregnancy were replaced by telehealth (telephone or video), along with changes to routine screening. Many providers plan to continue these changes despite a lack of evidence to guide practice. We aimed to describe the changes in maternity care provision, understand the perceived impact and explore services’ future plans regarding these changes. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study of midwifery managers of all Victorian public and private maternity services was conducted between March and October 2021. Questions explored health service characteristics, changes to maternity care delivery, telehealth practices, perceived impact of changes, and future plans. RESULTS: Fifty percent of services (34/68, 27 public and 6 private) responded, with broad representation of location, birth numbers and size of service. Around 50% of all pregnancy visits became telehealth. There were multiple combinations of which visits were face-to-face and which were telehealth. No visit was conducted face-to-face by all responding services. Visits most likely to be face-to-face were at 39 and 40 weeks gestation (65%). For telehealth appointments there was an ad hoc approach to advising women on routine screening, e.g., measuring blood pressure (11% did not advise at all), fetal growth (26% – no specific strategy) and fetal heart rate (15% – no specific strategy). Over half (52%) would consider maintaining telehealth post-pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a single state there is great variation in telehealth timing, when pregnant women should have face-to-face visits, and what routine screening is maintained. In light of emerging evidence of some potentially poorer clinical outcomes associated with telehealth in pregnancy, these findings need to be considered. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9465461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94654612022-09-12 COVID-19 and beyond – changes to provision of maternity care and future plans in Victorian maternity services Forster, Della Matthews, Ms Robyn Hyde, Ms Rebecca Women Birth Article BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid service changes were made to maternity care provision in Victorian maternity services. From March 2020 many routine face-to-face visits in pregnancy were replaced by telehealth (telephone or video), along with changes to routine screening. Many providers plan to continue these changes despite a lack of evidence to guide practice. We aimed to describe the changes in maternity care provision, understand the perceived impact and explore services’ future plans regarding these changes. METHODS: A population-based cross-sectional study of midwifery managers of all Victorian public and private maternity services was conducted between March and October 2021. Questions explored health service characteristics, changes to maternity care delivery, telehealth practices, perceived impact of changes, and future plans. RESULTS: Fifty percent of services (34/68, 27 public and 6 private) responded, with broad representation of location, birth numbers and size of service. Around 50% of all pregnancy visits became telehealth. There were multiple combinations of which visits were face-to-face and which were telehealth. No visit was conducted face-to-face by all responding services. Visits most likely to be face-to-face were at 39 and 40 weeks gestation (65%). For telehealth appointments there was an ad hoc approach to advising women on routine screening, e.g., measuring blood pressure (11% did not advise at all), fetal growth (26% – no specific strategy) and fetal heart rate (15% – no specific strategy). Over half (52%) would consider maintaining telehealth post-pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a single state there is great variation in telehealth timing, when pregnant women should have face-to-face visits, and what routine screening is maintained. In light of emerging evidence of some potentially poorer clinical outcomes associated with telehealth in pregnancy, these findings need to be considered. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-09 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9465461/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.07.098 Text en Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Forster, Della Matthews, Ms Robyn Hyde, Ms Rebecca COVID-19 and beyond – changes to provision of maternity care and future plans in Victorian maternity services |
title | COVID-19 and beyond – changes to provision of maternity care and future plans in Victorian maternity services |
title_full | COVID-19 and beyond – changes to provision of maternity care and future plans in Victorian maternity services |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 and beyond – changes to provision of maternity care and future plans in Victorian maternity services |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 and beyond – changes to provision of maternity care and future plans in Victorian maternity services |
title_short | COVID-19 and beyond – changes to provision of maternity care and future plans in Victorian maternity services |
title_sort | covid-19 and beyond – changes to provision of maternity care and future plans in victorian maternity services |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465461/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2022.07.098 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT forsterdella covid19andbeyondchangestoprovisionofmaternitycareandfutureplansinvictorianmaternityservices AT matthewsmsrobyn covid19andbeyondchangestoprovisionofmaternitycareandfutureplansinvictorianmaternityservices AT hydemsrebecca covid19andbeyondchangestoprovisionofmaternitycareandfutureplansinvictorianmaternityservices |