Cargando…

Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled Appointments for COVID Testing

INTRODUCTION: The COVID 19 pandemic increased the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic testing for COVID. When testing became available, a systems response was needed to efficiently accommodate the high-volume flow of patients who needed testing. Self-scheduling of COVID testing was developed to h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: North, Frederick, Nelson, Elissa M., Majerus, Rebecca J., Thompson, Matthew C., Knutson, Aric J., Crum, Brian A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928221125034
_version_ 1784787829320056832
author North, Frederick
Nelson, Elissa M.
Majerus, Rebecca J.
Thompson, Matthew C.
Knutson, Aric J.
Crum, Brian A.
author_facet North, Frederick
Nelson, Elissa M.
Majerus, Rebecca J.
Thompson, Matthew C.
Knutson, Aric J.
Crum, Brian A.
author_sort North, Frederick
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The COVID 19 pandemic increased the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic testing for COVID. When testing became available, a systems response was needed to efficiently accommodate the high-volume flow of patients who needed testing. Self-scheduling of COVID testing was developed to help patients safely and efficiently schedule their COVID testing online or with a mobile app. METHODS: We captured the counts of COVID test appointments, time patients spent in scheduling COVID test appointments, appointment lead times, and no-shows for COVID test appointments. For 17 months of self-scheduling, we retrospectively compared self-scheduling with the concurrent staff scheduling of COVID tests. RESULTS: From November 2020 through March 2022 there were 619 104 scheduled appointments for COVID testing with 22% (136 252) being self-scheduled. For asymptomatic self-scheduled COVID tests, accounting for 10.3% (63 605/619 104) of total COVID tests scheduled, median time to self-schedule was 3.1 min, interquartile range (IQR) [2.4,4.7]. For symptomatic self-schedulers accounting for 11.7% (72 647/619 104) of total COVID tests scheduled, the median time to self-triage and self-schedule was 5.8 min, IQR[4.3,8.9]. Self-scheduled COVID appointments increased to 44% (42 387/97 086) of the total COVID appointments during the peak month of January 2022. Median appointment lead time for symptomatic self-scheduled COVID test appointments was 6.6 h compared to 2.9 h (P < .0001) for symptomatic staff scheduled appointments. However, adjusting for the 24% (32 194/135 252) that self-scheduled during hours when testing was unavailable, the median appointment lead time for symptomatic self-scheduled patients dropped to 3.6 h. No-shows were 2.5% for self-scheduled appointments compared to 3.0% no-shows that were staff scheduled (odds ratio 0.83, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: COVID testing was self-scheduled for a large percent of scheduled COVID tests, taking patients only a few minutes to complete. Self-scheduling use increased over time, associated with a decreasing use of staff scheduled appointments and lower no-shows.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9465581
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94655812022-09-13 Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled Appointments for COVID Testing North, Frederick Nelson, Elissa M. Majerus, Rebecca J. Thompson, Matthew C. Knutson, Aric J. Crum, Brian A. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Original Research INTRODUCTION: The COVID 19 pandemic increased the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic testing for COVID. When testing became available, a systems response was needed to efficiently accommodate the high-volume flow of patients who needed testing. Self-scheduling of COVID testing was developed to help patients safely and efficiently schedule their COVID testing online or with a mobile app. METHODS: We captured the counts of COVID test appointments, time patients spent in scheduling COVID test appointments, appointment lead times, and no-shows for COVID test appointments. For 17 months of self-scheduling, we retrospectively compared self-scheduling with the concurrent staff scheduling of COVID tests. RESULTS: From November 2020 through March 2022 there were 619 104 scheduled appointments for COVID testing with 22% (136 252) being self-scheduled. For asymptomatic self-scheduled COVID tests, accounting for 10.3% (63 605/619 104) of total COVID tests scheduled, median time to self-schedule was 3.1 min, interquartile range (IQR) [2.4,4.7]. For symptomatic self-schedulers accounting for 11.7% (72 647/619 104) of total COVID tests scheduled, the median time to self-triage and self-schedule was 5.8 min, IQR[4.3,8.9]. Self-scheduled COVID appointments increased to 44% (42 387/97 086) of the total COVID appointments during the peak month of January 2022. Median appointment lead time for symptomatic self-scheduled COVID test appointments was 6.6 h compared to 2.9 h (P < .0001) for symptomatic staff scheduled appointments. However, adjusting for the 24% (32 194/135 252) that self-scheduled during hours when testing was unavailable, the median appointment lead time for symptomatic self-scheduled patients dropped to 3.6 h. No-shows were 2.5% for self-scheduled appointments compared to 3.0% no-shows that were staff scheduled (odds ratio 0.83, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: COVID testing was self-scheduled for a large percent of scheduled COVID tests, taking patients only a few minutes to complete. Self-scheduling use increased over time, associated with a decreasing use of staff scheduled appointments and lower no-shows. SAGE Publications 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9465581/ /pubmed/36105369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928221125034 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
North, Frederick
Nelson, Elissa M.
Majerus, Rebecca J.
Thompson, Matthew C.
Knutson, Aric J.
Crum, Brian A.
Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled Appointments for COVID Testing
title Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled Appointments for COVID Testing
title_full Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled Appointments for COVID Testing
title_fullStr Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled Appointments for COVID Testing
title_full_unstemmed Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled Appointments for COVID Testing
title_short Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled Appointments for COVID Testing
title_sort self-scheduling process efficiency and utilization of online self-scheduling of lab tests: a retrospective analysis of self-scheduled appointments for covid testing
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465581/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105369
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928221125034
work_keys_str_mv AT northfrederick selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting
AT nelsonelissam selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting
AT majerusrebeccaj selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting
AT thompsonmatthewc selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting
AT knutsonaricj selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting
AT crumbriana selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting