Cargando…
Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled Appointments for COVID Testing
INTRODUCTION: The COVID 19 pandemic increased the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic testing for COVID. When testing became available, a systems response was needed to efficiently accommodate the high-volume flow of patients who needed testing. Self-scheduling of COVID testing was developed to h...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928221125034 |
_version_ | 1784787829320056832 |
---|---|
author | North, Frederick Nelson, Elissa M. Majerus, Rebecca J. Thompson, Matthew C. Knutson, Aric J. Crum, Brian A. |
author_facet | North, Frederick Nelson, Elissa M. Majerus, Rebecca J. Thompson, Matthew C. Knutson, Aric J. Crum, Brian A. |
author_sort | North, Frederick |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The COVID 19 pandemic increased the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic testing for COVID. When testing became available, a systems response was needed to efficiently accommodate the high-volume flow of patients who needed testing. Self-scheduling of COVID testing was developed to help patients safely and efficiently schedule their COVID testing online or with a mobile app. METHODS: We captured the counts of COVID test appointments, time patients spent in scheduling COVID test appointments, appointment lead times, and no-shows for COVID test appointments. For 17 months of self-scheduling, we retrospectively compared self-scheduling with the concurrent staff scheduling of COVID tests. RESULTS: From November 2020 through March 2022 there were 619 104 scheduled appointments for COVID testing with 22% (136 252) being self-scheduled. For asymptomatic self-scheduled COVID tests, accounting for 10.3% (63 605/619 104) of total COVID tests scheduled, median time to self-schedule was 3.1 min, interquartile range (IQR) [2.4,4.7]. For symptomatic self-schedulers accounting for 11.7% (72 647/619 104) of total COVID tests scheduled, the median time to self-triage and self-schedule was 5.8 min, IQR[4.3,8.9]. Self-scheduled COVID appointments increased to 44% (42 387/97 086) of the total COVID appointments during the peak month of January 2022. Median appointment lead time for symptomatic self-scheduled COVID test appointments was 6.6 h compared to 2.9 h (P < .0001) for symptomatic staff scheduled appointments. However, adjusting for the 24% (32 194/135 252) that self-scheduled during hours when testing was unavailable, the median appointment lead time for symptomatic self-scheduled patients dropped to 3.6 h. No-shows were 2.5% for self-scheduled appointments compared to 3.0% no-shows that were staff scheduled (odds ratio 0.83, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: COVID testing was self-scheduled for a large percent of scheduled COVID tests, taking patients only a few minutes to complete. Self-scheduling use increased over time, associated with a decreasing use of staff scheduled appointments and lower no-shows. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9465581 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94655812022-09-13 Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled Appointments for COVID Testing North, Frederick Nelson, Elissa M. Majerus, Rebecca J. Thompson, Matthew C. Knutson, Aric J. Crum, Brian A. Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol Original Research INTRODUCTION: The COVID 19 pandemic increased the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic testing for COVID. When testing became available, a systems response was needed to efficiently accommodate the high-volume flow of patients who needed testing. Self-scheduling of COVID testing was developed to help patients safely and efficiently schedule their COVID testing online or with a mobile app. METHODS: We captured the counts of COVID test appointments, time patients spent in scheduling COVID test appointments, appointment lead times, and no-shows for COVID test appointments. For 17 months of self-scheduling, we retrospectively compared self-scheduling with the concurrent staff scheduling of COVID tests. RESULTS: From November 2020 through March 2022 there were 619 104 scheduled appointments for COVID testing with 22% (136 252) being self-scheduled. For asymptomatic self-scheduled COVID tests, accounting for 10.3% (63 605/619 104) of total COVID tests scheduled, median time to self-schedule was 3.1 min, interquartile range (IQR) [2.4,4.7]. For symptomatic self-schedulers accounting for 11.7% (72 647/619 104) of total COVID tests scheduled, the median time to self-triage and self-schedule was 5.8 min, IQR[4.3,8.9]. Self-scheduled COVID appointments increased to 44% (42 387/97 086) of the total COVID appointments during the peak month of January 2022. Median appointment lead time for symptomatic self-scheduled COVID test appointments was 6.6 h compared to 2.9 h (P < .0001) for symptomatic staff scheduled appointments. However, adjusting for the 24% (32 194/135 252) that self-scheduled during hours when testing was unavailable, the median appointment lead time for symptomatic self-scheduled patients dropped to 3.6 h. No-shows were 2.5% for self-scheduled appointments compared to 3.0% no-shows that were staff scheduled (odds ratio 0.83, P < .0001). CONCLUSION: COVID testing was self-scheduled for a large percent of scheduled COVID tests, taking patients only a few minutes to complete. Self-scheduling use increased over time, associated with a decreasing use of staff scheduled appointments and lower no-shows. SAGE Publications 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9465581/ /pubmed/36105369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928221125034 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research North, Frederick Nelson, Elissa M. Majerus, Rebecca J. Thompson, Matthew C. Knutson, Aric J. Crum, Brian A. Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled Appointments for COVID Testing |
title | Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online
Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled
Appointments for COVID Testing |
title_full | Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online
Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled
Appointments for COVID Testing |
title_fullStr | Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online
Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled
Appointments for COVID Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online
Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled
Appointments for COVID Testing |
title_short | Self-Scheduling Process Efficiency and Utilization of Online
Self-Scheduling of Lab Tests: A Retrospective Analysis of Self-Scheduled
Appointments for COVID Testing |
title_sort | self-scheduling process efficiency and utilization of online
self-scheduling of lab tests: a retrospective analysis of self-scheduled
appointments for covid testing |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465581/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105369 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23333928221125034 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT northfrederick selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting AT nelsonelissam selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting AT majerusrebeccaj selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting AT thompsonmatthewc selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting AT knutsonaricj selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting AT crumbriana selfschedulingprocessefficiencyandutilizationofonlineselfschedulingoflabtestsaretrospectiveanalysisofselfscheduledappointmentsforcovidtesting |