Cargando…

Brain-In-Hand technology for adults with acquired brain injury: A convergence of mixed methods findings

INTRODUCTION: Individuals with acquired brain injury may find it difficult to self-manage and live independently. Brain-in-Hand is a smartphone app designed to support psychological problems and encourage behaviour change, comprised of a structured diary, reminders, agreed solutions, and traffic lig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kettlewell, Jade, Ward, Asha, das Nair, Roshan, Radford, Kate
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20556683221117759
_version_ 1784787832510873600
author Kettlewell, Jade
Ward, Asha
das Nair, Roshan
Radford, Kate
author_facet Kettlewell, Jade
Ward, Asha
das Nair, Roshan
Radford, Kate
author_sort Kettlewell, Jade
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Individuals with acquired brain injury may find it difficult to self-manage and live independently. Brain-in-Hand is a smartphone app designed to support psychological problems and encourage behaviour change, comprised of a structured diary, reminders, agreed solutions, and traffic light monitoring system. AIM: To evaluate the potential use and effectiveness of Brain-in-Hand for self-management in adults with acquired brain injury. METHODS: A-B mixed-methods case-study design. Individuals with acquired brain injury (n = 10) received Brain-in-Hand for up to 12 months. Measures of mood, independence, quality of life, cognition, fatigue, goal attainment, participation administered at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Semi-structured interviews conducted with acquired brain injury participants (n = 9) and healthcare workers (n = 3) at 6 months. RESULTS: Significant increase in goal attainment after 6 months use (t(7) = 4.20, p = .004). No significant improvement in other outcomes. Qualitative data suggested improvement in anxiety management. Contextual (personal/environmental) factors were key in influencing the use and effectiveness of Brain-in-Hand. Having sufficient insight, appropriate support and motivation facilitated use. CONCLUSIONS: Brain-in-Hand shows potential to support acquired brain injury, but further work is required to determine its effectiveness. Context played a pivotal role in the effectiveness and sustained use of Brain-in-Hand, and needs to be explored to support implementation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9465594
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94655942022-09-13 Brain-In-Hand technology for adults with acquired brain injury: A convergence of mixed methods findings Kettlewell, Jade Ward, Asha das Nair, Roshan Radford, Kate J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng Original Manuscript INTRODUCTION: Individuals with acquired brain injury may find it difficult to self-manage and live independently. Brain-in-Hand is a smartphone app designed to support psychological problems and encourage behaviour change, comprised of a structured diary, reminders, agreed solutions, and traffic light monitoring system. AIM: To evaluate the potential use and effectiveness of Brain-in-Hand for self-management in adults with acquired brain injury. METHODS: A-B mixed-methods case-study design. Individuals with acquired brain injury (n = 10) received Brain-in-Hand for up to 12 months. Measures of mood, independence, quality of life, cognition, fatigue, goal attainment, participation administered at baseline, 6 and 12 months. Semi-structured interviews conducted with acquired brain injury participants (n = 9) and healthcare workers (n = 3) at 6 months. RESULTS: Significant increase in goal attainment after 6 months use (t(7) = 4.20, p = .004). No significant improvement in other outcomes. Qualitative data suggested improvement in anxiety management. Contextual (personal/environmental) factors were key in influencing the use and effectiveness of Brain-in-Hand. Having sufficient insight, appropriate support and motivation facilitated use. CONCLUSIONS: Brain-in-Hand shows potential to support acquired brain injury, but further work is required to determine its effectiveness. Context played a pivotal role in the effectiveness and sustained use of Brain-in-Hand, and needs to be explored to support implementation. SAGE Publications 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9465594/ /pubmed/36105910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20556683221117759 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Kettlewell, Jade
Ward, Asha
das Nair, Roshan
Radford, Kate
Brain-In-Hand technology for adults with acquired brain injury: A convergence of mixed methods findings
title Brain-In-Hand technology for adults with acquired brain injury: A convergence of mixed methods findings
title_full Brain-In-Hand technology for adults with acquired brain injury: A convergence of mixed methods findings
title_fullStr Brain-In-Hand technology for adults with acquired brain injury: A convergence of mixed methods findings
title_full_unstemmed Brain-In-Hand technology for adults with acquired brain injury: A convergence of mixed methods findings
title_short Brain-In-Hand technology for adults with acquired brain injury: A convergence of mixed methods findings
title_sort brain-in-hand technology for adults with acquired brain injury: a convergence of mixed methods findings
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465594/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20556683221117759
work_keys_str_mv AT kettlewelljade braininhandtechnologyforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryaconvergenceofmixedmethodsfindings
AT wardasha braininhandtechnologyforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryaconvergenceofmixedmethodsfindings
AT dasnairroshan braininhandtechnologyforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryaconvergenceofmixedmethodsfindings
AT radfordkate braininhandtechnologyforadultswithacquiredbraininjuryaconvergenceofmixedmethodsfindings