Cargando…

COVID-19 as an opportunity for minimally-invasive dentistry: a national cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: During the COVID19 pandemic, the Latvian government issued first absolute restrictions (elective treatments prohibited, only emergency care) and later relative restrictions (preference for non-aerosol-generating procedures (AGP) and emergency care) on dental care. This study aims to asse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maldupa, Ilze, Slepcova, Olga, Vidulskane, Ilona, Brinkmane, Anda, Senakola, Egita, Uribe, Sergio E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36096784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02432-7
_version_ 1784787845943132160
author Maldupa, Ilze
Slepcova, Olga
Vidulskane, Ilona
Brinkmane, Anda
Senakola, Egita
Uribe, Sergio E.
author_facet Maldupa, Ilze
Slepcova, Olga
Vidulskane, Ilona
Brinkmane, Anda
Senakola, Egita
Uribe, Sergio E.
author_sort Maldupa, Ilze
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: During the COVID19 pandemic, the Latvian government issued first absolute restrictions (elective treatments prohibited, only emergency care) and later relative restrictions (preference for non-aerosol-generating procedures (AGP) and emergency care) on dental care. This study aims to assess the impact of these restrictions on the decision made by Latvian dentists about caries treatment. METHODS: A Survey-based cross-sectional study was used. A minimum sample size of 174 dentists was estimated for national representativeness (N = 1524). The questionnaire was developed by experts and sent three times via email to Latvian dentists from July to September 2020 and was also delivered in printed form at two national conferences in September and October 2020. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: We received 373 completed questionnaires, with a total response rate of 24.5%. Under the recommendation to reduce AGP for the treatment of uncomplicated caries, 10% of the dentists stated that they would stop attending, 54% would only attend emergencies, and 36% would attend as usual. Under prohibition, the percentages are 15%, 74%, and 11%, respectively. Regarding the type of treatment, more than 75% would opt to proceed with selective caries removal for both primary and permanent teeth and 10% for extraction. CONCLUSION: Latvian dentists are willing to treat patients with caries during the pandemic and state that they prefer to use non- or minimally invasive and less aerosol-generating methods for caries treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02432-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9465652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94656522022-09-12 COVID-19 as an opportunity for minimally-invasive dentistry: a national cross-sectional survey Maldupa, Ilze Slepcova, Olga Vidulskane, Ilona Brinkmane, Anda Senakola, Egita Uribe, Sergio E. BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: During the COVID19 pandemic, the Latvian government issued first absolute restrictions (elective treatments prohibited, only emergency care) and later relative restrictions (preference for non-aerosol-generating procedures (AGP) and emergency care) on dental care. This study aims to assess the impact of these restrictions on the decision made by Latvian dentists about caries treatment. METHODS: A Survey-based cross-sectional study was used. A minimum sample size of 174 dentists was estimated for national representativeness (N = 1524). The questionnaire was developed by experts and sent three times via email to Latvian dentists from July to September 2020 and was also delivered in printed form at two national conferences in September and October 2020. Descriptive statistics were calculated. RESULTS: We received 373 completed questionnaires, with a total response rate of 24.5%. Under the recommendation to reduce AGP for the treatment of uncomplicated caries, 10% of the dentists stated that they would stop attending, 54% would only attend emergencies, and 36% would attend as usual. Under prohibition, the percentages are 15%, 74%, and 11%, respectively. Regarding the type of treatment, more than 75% would opt to proceed with selective caries removal for both primary and permanent teeth and 10% for extraction. CONCLUSION: Latvian dentists are willing to treat patients with caries during the pandemic and state that they prefer to use non- or minimally invasive and less aerosol-generating methods for caries treatment. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12903-022-02432-7. BioMed Central 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9465652/ /pubmed/36096784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02432-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Maldupa, Ilze
Slepcova, Olga
Vidulskane, Ilona
Brinkmane, Anda
Senakola, Egita
Uribe, Sergio E.
COVID-19 as an opportunity for minimally-invasive dentistry: a national cross-sectional survey
title COVID-19 as an opportunity for minimally-invasive dentistry: a national cross-sectional survey
title_full COVID-19 as an opportunity for minimally-invasive dentistry: a national cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr COVID-19 as an opportunity for minimally-invasive dentistry: a national cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 as an opportunity for minimally-invasive dentistry: a national cross-sectional survey
title_short COVID-19 as an opportunity for minimally-invasive dentistry: a national cross-sectional survey
title_sort covid-19 as an opportunity for minimally-invasive dentistry: a national cross-sectional survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36096784
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02432-7
work_keys_str_mv AT maldupailze covid19asanopportunityforminimallyinvasivedentistryanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT slepcovaolga covid19asanopportunityforminimallyinvasivedentistryanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT vidulskaneilona covid19asanopportunityforminimallyinvasivedentistryanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT brinkmaneanda covid19asanopportunityforminimallyinvasivedentistryanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT senakolaegita covid19asanopportunityforminimallyinvasivedentistryanationalcrosssectionalsurvey
AT uribesergioe covid19asanopportunityforminimallyinvasivedentistryanationalcrosssectionalsurvey